On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 23:11 -0400, Alex wrote:
It would be great if there was an automated script that included
checking surbl.org and others right from a shell script, given a
domain name.
What exactly are you trying to do? By that I mean, do you want to:
1) test an individual domain name
On 05/31/2013 05:11 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to be able to take a domain such as fellass.us and check it
against the same blacklists used by sites like mxtools, except do it
on the command-line. We have our own URIBL for domains that haven't
yet been added to zen or surriel, etc. I'd
I've been running spamassassin for about 4 years on a centos 5 server,
currently running spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5. I've always been impressed and
very pleased with the way SA works and I regularly run sa-update and I
update the bayes databases. I use plugins too - raor, pyzor, dkim etc but
over
I'd check what rules are firing for the spam that gets through
Could be youve got a whitelist entry being abused or even something
internally generating the crud
Martin
On Friday, 31 May 2013, tony wrote:
I've been running spamassassin for about 4 years on a centos 5 server,
currently
On 31.05.13 03:52, tony wrote:
I've been running spamassassin for about 4 years on a centos 5 server,
currently running spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5. I've always been impressed and
very pleased with the way SA works and I regularly run sa-update and I
update the bayes databases. I use plugins too -
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 03:52 -0700, tony wrote:
I've been running spamassassin for about 4 years on a centos 5 server,
currently running spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5. I've always been impressed and
very pleased with the way SA works and I regularly run sa-update and I
update the bayes databases. I
Title: FirmaMatteo
Hello, my name is Matteo.
I do not manage a spamassassin installation, but I would like to ask
this simple question, because I saw it is a rule which is used to
evaluate spam score.
I tried searching Google, the users forum, the Wiki and the Docs
On 5/31/2013 8:30 AM, Matteo Vannucchi - TeamEnterprise wrote:
Hello, my name is Matteo.
I do not manage a spamassassin installation, but I would like to ask
this simple question, because I saw it is a rule which is used to
evaluate spam score.
I tried searching Google, the users forum, the
Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to be able to take a domain such as fellass.us and check it
against the same blacklists used by sites like mxtools, except do it
on the command-line. We have our own URIBL for domains that haven't
yet been added to zen or surriel, etc. I'd like to periodically
Hey all -
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
The problem I'm running across is that using a rule like this one:
mimeheader HTML_ATTACH Content-Type =~ /^text\/html/i
Will flag all messages that come in as HTML (vs. plain text).
I found this :
header
On 05/31/2013 05:51 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey all -
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
The problem I'm running across is that using a rule like this one:
mimeheader HTML_ATTACH Content-Type =~ /^text\/html/i
Will flag all messages that come in as HTML (vs.
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:51 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
..snippage..
I found this :
header HTML_ATTACH_RULE_2 Content-Disposition =~
/^filename\=\[a-z]{2}\.html\/i
Don't anchor it to the start of the line, i.e. try this:
That didn't work :(
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.orgwrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:51 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
..snippage..
I found this :
header HTML_ATTACH_RULE_2
Didn't work with mime_header (or mimeheader) with either rule.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/31/2013 05:51 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey all -
I'm trying to set up a custom rule that scores HTML attachments.
The problem I'm running across is that
On Fri, 31 May 2013 14:10:36 -0400
Andrew Talbot andrew.talbot.ownweb...@gmail.com wrote:
That didn't work :(
What didn't work? Oh... you top-posted.
Anyway... you might need a full rule, which can be expensive.
Something like:
full HTML_RULE
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
That didn't work :(
Can you post one or two examples of actual MIME attachment headers that
you're trying to get the rule to fire on?
Obvious question, but have you enabled the MIME header module?
I'm using MimeMagic and enabling it
That's what I was afraid of. We generally avoid those kinds of rules since
we are scanning millions of messages a day.
-Original Message-
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:d...@roaringpenguin.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:22 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rule to
I need it to fire on any HTML attachment. The modules are enabled. I can get it
to pick up text/html, remember, but the problem is that it detects messages
sent as HTML when it's set up like that. It doesn't detect plain-text messages,
but it will flag plain-text messages with HTML files
On Fri, 31 May 2013 14:43:27 -0400
Andrew Talbot andrew.talbot.ownweb...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what I was afraid of. We generally avoid those kinds of rules
since we are scanning millions of messages a day.
Well, a few rules won't hurt. We peak at around 6 million messages/day,
though we
now I've given it some more thought it's a certain type of spam that gets
through. I never get scams or marital aid spam, never. The spam mails that
get through are consistently to do with hospitality, increased sales and
business courses. Are there rules I should be using to combat this type of
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 14:45 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I need it to fire on any HTML attachment. The modules are enabled. I
can get it to pick up text/html, remember, but the problem is that it
detects messages sent as HTML when it's set up like that. It doesn't
detect plain-text messages,
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to be able to take a domain such as fellass.us and check it
against the same blacklists used by sites like mxtools, except do it
on the command-line. We have our own URIBL for domains that haven't
yet been added to zen or surriel, etc. I'd like
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Andrew Talbot wrote:
I need it to fire on any HTML attachment. The modules are enabled. I can
get it to pick up text/html, remember, but the problem is that it
detects messages sent as HTML when it's set up like that.
Meta it with a negated subrule that hits on regular
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 12:15 -0700, tony wrote:
now I've given it some more thought it's a certain type of spam that gets
through. I never get scams or marital aid spam, never. The spam mails that
get through are consistently to do with hospitality, increased sales and
business courses. Are
Hi,
It would be great if there was an automated script that included
checking surbl.org and others right from a shell script, given a
domain name.
I've attached a perl script that I hacked together 15 years ago to
query both host-based and IPv4 based DNSBL lists. It's kind'a mutated
over
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 11:51 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
header HTML_ATTACH_RULE_2
You will need a mimeheader [1] rule. A header rule matches the mail
headers only.
Content-Disposition =~ /^filename\=\[a-z]{2}\.html\/i
That is not matching an
Hi, Martin -
Thank you for your response. The original test was using a file arbitrarily
named aa.html .. It still doesn't work with the rewrite you provided :/
-Original Message-
From: Martin Gregorie [mailto:mar...@gregorie.org]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 3:38 PM
To:
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 17:48 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Thank you for your response. The original test was using a file
arbitrarily named aa.html .. It still doesn't work with the rewrite
you provided :/
I did wonder. Its absolutely essential to have at least one genuine
message to test your
28 matches
Mail list logo
