On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 02:45:12AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> This is not a formal announcement, but an invitation to a broader
> users community to try the release candidate of the coming release
> of Apache SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 .
>
> Preliminary release notes and a link to the package w
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Robert S wrote:
That wasn't the complete reply - hit the reply button too soon . . .
The two addresses at the top are my ISP's DNS servers and the bottom is the
IP address of my server. I still get the administrator notice with this
configuration. Is there an additional s
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Robert S wrote:
I am running spamassassin_3.3.2-5 on debian Wheezy on a small business server
(x86). I am getting numerous complaints about mail
being falely categorised as spam/ham. I also use version 3.3.2 on my home
server using gentoo (amd64) and don't have these
pro
That wasn't the complete reply - hit the reply button too soon . . .
The two addresses at the top are my ISP's DNS servers and the bottom is the
IP address of my server. I still get the administrator notice with this
configuration. Is there an additional step that I need to take? I'm not a
DNS
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Robert S wrote:
This message seems to get blocked in a lot of blocklists (which also
seem to happen to my users' messages).
That's the first thing you need to resolve.
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
I am running spamassassin_3.3.2-5 on debian Wheezy on a small business
server (x86). I am getting numerous complaints about mail being falely
categorised as spam/ham. I also use version 3.3.2 on my home server using
gentoo (amd64) and don't have these problems. I have removed all
customisations
This is not a formal announcement, but an invitation to a broader
users community to try the release candidate of the coming release
of Apache SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 .
Preliminary release notes and a link to the package was published
in a posting to the d...@spamassassin.apache.org mailing lis
We had none yesterday but some 700
today which is a decent amount.
However, the attachments were filtered as bad filenames and
quarantined which adds a 2.5 score to our spam tests which also
blocked all of them so very few made it to inboxes.
R
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:56:19 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > Annoyingly, the envelope sender is no-re...@intuit.com which has an
> > SPF permerror... FAIL.
> and you accept permerror :)
Well, what would you suggest? :) I don't think our customers would
accept unconditional blocking of intuit.c
David F. Skoll skrev den 2013-06-21 19:40:
Annoyingly, the envelope sender is no-re...@intuit.com which has an
SPF permerror... FAIL.
and you accept permerror :)
*sigh*
is the zipfile always 6 bytes where the 2 first chars is not pk ?, that
is not even a zip file then
--
senders that pu
yes, saw both the scanner ones and the new ones, too.
jay plesset
IT, dp-design.com
On 6/21/2013 10:40 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi,
We're seeing a huge rash of viruses with malformed payloads. They're
supposed to contain a ZIP file, but the MIME part supposedly containing
the ZIP file simply
Hi,
We're seeing a huge rash of viruses with malformed payloads. They're
supposed to contain a ZIP file, but the MIME part supposedly containing
the ZIP file simply contains:
Error[Base64]
Sample: http://pastebin.com/fkjf9LHR
Yesterday, they were "Scanned Copy" spams from an HP printer. Today
On 06/21/2013 05:29 PM, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
I'm using amavisd-new to pass messages to SA.
Envelope recipients are in the mail message, as payloads of my custom
X-header. That's why I asked for a way to check headers against URI BLs.
I'm considering filtering out bad recipient domains using b
Il 21/06/13 17:16, Axb ha scritto:
On 06/21/2013 05:07 PM, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
Il 21/06/13 16:27, Axb ha scritto:
This is possible against standard headers.
you can see how it's done in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL
Ok, so I assume there's no way to force checks against custom he
Il 21/06/13 16:49, Martin Gregorie ha scritto:
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 15:21 +0200, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
I normally already scan the BCCed message *only*. The main submission
channel doesn't have an antispam system on its own; instead, an
out-of-band antispam stack (postfix + amavisd-new + sp
On 06/21/2013 05:07 PM, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
Il 21/06/13 16:27, Axb ha scritto:
This is possible against standard headers.
you can see how it's done in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL
Ok, so I assume there's no way to force checks against custom headers.
Plus, I'm more interested in
Il 21/06/13 16:27, Axb ha scritto:
This is possible against standard headers.
you can see how it's done in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL
Ok, so I assume there's no way to force checks against custom headers.
Plus, I'm more interested in check against envelope recipients.
Why do you nee
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 15:21 +0200, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> I normally already scan the BCCed message *only*. The main submission
> channel doesn't have an antispam system on its own; instead, an
> out-of-band antispam stack (postfix + amavisd-new + spamassassin) is in
> place; it receives BC
On 06/21/2013 03:21 PM, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
Il 21/06/13 14:19, Martin Gregorie ha scritto:
Assuming that the copy is sent to a maildir format mailbox you can
periodically run a shell script something this:
for m in maildir/*
do
spamc <$m | rescanned_results_filter
mv $m scanned_dir
Il 21/06/13 14:19, Martin Gregorie ha scritto:
Assuming that the copy is sent to a maildir format mailbox you can
periodically run a shell script something this:
for m in maildir/*
do
spamc <$m | rescanned_results_filter
mv $m scanned_dir
done
This could be a second pass through your no
Benny,
Regarding:
sa-learn --spam /var/qmail/mailnames/hosted-domain.com/user-1/Maildir/.Spam/cur
thank you for the correction and the education.
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 10:27 +0200, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've configured my MSA (Postfix) so that a copy of submitted mail is
> sent (BCC'd) to a postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin system for
> out-of-band antispam analysis.
> The MSA is set to write envelope from/rcpt addre
emailitis.com skrev den 2013-06-21 09:27:
I have one of our own widely known email addresses that gets a fair
bit. I have put Spam into the Spam email. Can I run the following
command:
sa-learn
/var/qmail/mailnames/hosted-domain.com/user-1/Maildir/.Spam/cur
sa-learn --spam
/var/qmail/mailna
Hi everybody,
I've configured my MSA (Postfix) so that a copy of submitted mail is
sent (BCC'd) to a postfix/amavisd-new/spamassassin system for
out-of-band antispam analysis.
The MSA is set to write envelope from/rcpt addresses in custom headers.
Is it possibile to check this addresses' domai
I'm trying to get SA to do better manual training to make it better.
We have autolearn turned on but some Spam gets through with low BAYES values
and having clearly been incorrectly learnt in the past.
Server-wide, we can only look at the maillog so not sure how, if we find a
pattern of ema
25 matches
Mail list logo
