The reason for read-only is that I am using PostgreSQL with hot standby
streaming replication. The main MX server will use the master PostgreSQL server
and the backup MX will use its own local PostgreSQL slave server. The slave
server of a PostgreSQL hot standby pair is only available in
On 07/09/2014 12:40 AM, RW wrote:
use_learner 0
use_learner ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1)
Whether to use any machine-learning classifiers with
SpamAssassin, such as the default 'BAYES_*' rules. Setting this to
0 will disable use of any and all human-trained classifiers.
On 9. jul. 2014 07.00.44 CEST, Sergio sec...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that my rule using Received instead of From did the trick,
the rule is working now.
It 2 diffrent spams :)
These are the headers from amazoncoupons-user=domain@lastawhdak.com:
headerBLACKLIST_REGEXFrom:address
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:42:26 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 9. jul. 2014 07.00.44 CEST, Sergio sec...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that my rule using Received instead of From did the
trick, the rule is working now.
It should run only on the From header. Otherwise it may FP on VERP and
similar
On 7/9/2014 1:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
It seems that my rule using Received instead of From did the
trick, the rule is working now.
Sergio,
The format of that email address is likely verp or some related format
that encodes the recipient in the From address so that bounces can be
processed
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:54:08 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/9/2014 1:00 AM, Sergio wrote:
It seems that my rule using Received instead of From did the
trick, the rule is working now.
Sergio,
The format of that email address is likely verp or some related
format that encodes the
On 7/9/2014 9:08 AM, RW wrote:
VERP and similar schemes work on the envelope, so checking the From
header should relatively safe.
Not debating that point because it's not really my point. I'm trying to
focus on the fact that the existence of the schema he is looking for
with the rule looks
Greetings,
We've been running Spamassassin (3.3.1 currently, concurrently with
Amavis) using MySQL as a backend for many years now and we have 1
million + entries in the Bayes table. At this time, there seems to be a
lot of spam getting through the filters and we currently have our spam
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
We've been running Spamassassin (3.3.1 currently, concurrently with Amavis)
using MySQL as a backend for many years now and we have 1 million + entries
in the Bayes table. At this time, there seems to be a lot of spam getting
through the filters
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 05:44:34 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
If you deliberately try to sneak past sensible security measures, you
should not be surprised to be blocked. The attempt by an honest user
to disguise any $file (he did it on purpose, so he knows there's
First of all why do people insist on hiding names of companies that
do stuff like this? It just makes it look like your manufacturing
an event that doesn't exist, it destroys your credibility.
Secondly, if you think that this is an example of badness on Windows
security best practices you
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
First of all why do people insist on hiding names of companies that
do stuff like this? It just makes it look like your manufacturing
an event that doesn't exist, it destroys your credibility.
You mean besides NDAs
On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:42 AM, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, motty cruz wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I was having similar issues, can you do su - vscan and restart amavisd
service?
user vscan != user amavis.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Bruce Sackett br...@oecnw.com
I had similar issue, I am running FreeBSD, in my etc/group
vscan:*:110:clamav
also, cd /var
ls -la
drwxr-x 8 vscan vscan amavis
because inside /var/amavisd
db .spamassassin
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Bruce Sackett br...@oecnw.com wrote:
On Jul 8,
On 7/9/2014 11:37 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Ted Mittelstaedtt...@ipinc.net wrote:
First of all why do people insist on hiding names of companies that
do stuff like this? It just makes it look like your manufacturing
an event that doesn't exist, it destroys
Hi all,
first of all, big thanks for all the inputs.
I am seeing a nice quantity of blocked spammers it was really a high rate
of them and KAM you, as always, are right. It is taking some FP on the run,
but from 640 blocked emails less than a 1 percent were FP, that FPs are
being taking care on a
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:44:27 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
David DID NOT say that. He said that he was shocked to discover
Why are you assuming he is under NDA or he is an employee of this
company?
Let me clarify the situation:
1) I'm the owner of Roaring Penguin, so my boss
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
You are an administrator. YOU ARE PAID BY CLUELESS USERS TO PROTECT
THEM AND THEIR DATA, DAMMIT.
recovered_monk
...unless it involves some actual, you know, effort on their part.
/recovered_monk
And in this instance, Large DP Company *is* doing
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net wrote:
On 7/9/2014 11:37 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Ted Mittelstaedtt...@ipinc.net wrote:
First of all why do people insist on hiding names of companies that
do stuff like this? It just
19 matches
Mail list logo
