Re: "more_spam_from" like "more_spam_to"

2014-09-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100, RW wrote: RW> A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most RW> of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results RW> you have to extend your internal network and maintain it. On 18.09.14 22:09, Ian Zimmerman wrote: D

Re: "more_spam_from" like "more_spam_to"

2014-09-18 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100, RW wrote: RW> A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most RW> of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results RW> you have to extend your internal network and maintain it. Do you mean the "trusted_networks" setting h

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Axb
On 09/18/2014 09:58 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Jari Fredriksson wrote: haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http or plain tcp connections. HA. What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute farm? (Just curious...) Redis, can't beat it in speed and c

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.09.2014 um 21:58 schrieb Bob Proulx: > Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http >> or plain tcp connections. HA. > > What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute > farm? (Just curious...) something like MySQL is

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Bob Proulx
Jari Fredriksson wrote: > haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http > or plain tcp connections. HA. What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute farm? (Just curious...) Bob

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Jari Fredriksson
18.09.2014, 20:15, Alex Regan kirjoitti: > >>> LVS >> >> Implemented haproxy. Took 3 minutes to install and configure ;) > > So that basically works the same way as LVS, where you set up one > server to distribute the load across N number of spamassassin systems > connected to it? > > If you set it

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Alex Regan
LVS Implemented haproxy. Took 3 minutes to install and configure ;) So that basically works the same way as LVS, where you set up one server to distribute the load across N number of spamassassin systems connected to it? If you set it up in 3 minutes, how about tuning? Is it as flexible?

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Jari Fredriksson
17.09.2014, 22:22, Axb kirjoitti: > On 09/17/2014 09:10 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just >> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit* >> more intelligent is needed. >> > > LVS > > Implemented hapro

Re: Simple question: load balancing spamd

2014-09-18 Thread Jari Fredriksson
17.09.2014, 22:22, Reindl Harald kirjoitti: > Am 17.09.2014 um 21:10 schrieb Jari Fredriksson: >> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just >> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit* >> more intelligent is needed > have you considered h

Re: "more_spam_from" like "more_spam_to"

2014-09-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.09.2014 um 23:51 schrieb RW: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:24:10 +0200 > Reindl Harald wrote: >> please read my previous message >> >> what i asked is careful considered and exactly what i need >> even if you could reach something similar with other ways >> because the admin backend needs to be u