On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100, RW wrote:
RW> A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW> of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results
RW> you have to extend your internal network and maintain it.
On 18.09.14 22:09, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
D
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100,
RW wrote:
RW> A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW> of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results
RW> you have to extend your internal network and maintain it.
Do you mean the "trusted_networks" setting h
On 09/18/2014 09:58 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
or plain tcp connections. HA.
What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
farm? (Just curious...)
Redis, can't beat it in speed and c
Am 18.09.2014 um 21:58 schrieb Bob Proulx:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
>> or plain tcp connections. HA.
>
> What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
> farm? (Just curious...)
something like MySQL is
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
> or plain tcp connections. HA.
What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
farm? (Just curious...)
Bob
18.09.2014, 20:15, Alex Regan kirjoitti:
>
>>> LVS
>>
>> Implemented haproxy. Took 3 minutes to install and configure ;)
>
> So that basically works the same way as LVS, where you set up one
> server to distribute the load across N number of spamassassin systems
> connected to it?
>
> If you set it
LVS
Implemented haproxy. Took 3 minutes to install and configure ;)
So that basically works the same way as LVS, where you set up one server
to distribute the load across N number of spamassassin systems connected
to it?
If you set it up in 3 minutes, how about tuning? Is it as flexible?
17.09.2014, 22:22, Axb kirjoitti:
> On 09/17/2014 09:10 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
>> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
>> more intelligent is needed.
>>
>
> LVS
>
>
Implemented hapro
17.09.2014, 22:22, Reindl Harald kirjoitti:
> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:10 schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
>> What kind of simple load balancers are you using? I have been using just
>> DNS multiple address but that does not work any more. Something a *bit*
>> more intelligent is needed
> have you considered h
Am 17.09.2014 um 23:51 schrieb RW:
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:24:10 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> please read my previous message
>>
>> what i asked is careful considered and exactly what i need
>> even if you could reach something similar with other ways
>> because the admin backend needs to be u
10 matches
Mail list logo