On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 16:15:16 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On October 5, 2014 2:17:28 PM David Jones wrote:
>
> > > Possible extend dkim plugin to bayes ignore header if not dkim
> > > signed, tricky yes, but imho makes sense
> >
> > Why wouldn't all DKIM headers (X-DKIM above and real ones) be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02-10-14 12:38, Axb wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 11:13 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using dspam besides spamassassin, and am interested in
>> comparing the bayesian data between the two. Dspam reports
>> statistics that include somewhat st
Karsten Bräckelmann:
The directory name and accompanying cf file are generated by
sa-update based on the channel name. There is no way for the channel to
enforce order.
Besides picking a channel name that lexicographically comes after the
to-be-overridden target channel, you're limited to loca
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 13:19 +0200, A. Schulze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had the idea to run my own updateserver for two purposes:
> 1. distribute own rules
> 2. override existing rules
>
> But somehow I fail on #2.
>
>
> SA rules normally reside in /var/.../spamassassin/$SA-VERSION/channelname/
On October 5, 2014 2:17:28 PM David Jones wrote:
> Possible extend dkim plugin to bayes ignore header if not dkim signed,
> tricky yes, but imho makes sense
Why wouldn't all DKIM headers (X-DKIM above and real ones) be excluded?
These DKIM headers by themselves are not a good indicator as they
Am 05.10.2014 um 14:17 schrieb David Jones:
On October 4, 2014 6:50:44 PM jdebert wrote:
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mailsea.docusign.net JQ9N42F3MTC8
^^
Never seen this before from sendmail. Bogus DKIM header?
Iis it also possible to test for conflicting X- header
> On October 4, 2014 6:50:44 PM jdebert wrote:
> > > X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mailsea.docusign.net JQ9N42F3MTC8
> >^^
> > Never seen this before from sendmail. Bogus DKIM header?
> > Iis it also possible to test for conflicting X- headers?
> Possible extend dkim plug
On October 4, 2014 6:50:44 PM jdebert wrote:
> X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mailsea.docusign.net JQ9N42F3MTC8
^^
Never seen this before from sendmail. Bogus DKIM header?
Iis it also possible to test for conflicting X- headers?
Possible extend dkim plugin to bayes ignore
Am 04.10.2014 um 18:27 schrieb jdebert:
My apologies. You are 100,000% correct about changing annoying
behaviours.
thank you very much!
I did not find the message you referred to, perhaps because
of a forgotten convenience filter that strips nuisance tags
from subjects
the intention was no
