On 01.05.15 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Reindl's test showed it is hitting URIBL and it looks like it's also
a good candidate for raising your SPF score and Bayesian training.
I wouldn't say so... for getting standard required_score 5.0 is standard 1.7
points for URIBL_BLACK and standard
I just moved from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 and am seeing messages from SA in maillog
that I've not seen before. Do they indicate an issue with my installation?
Here is a segment from the log. This pattern repeats each time SA
processes a message. The use of uninitialized value and copy_config
timeout
Am 01.05.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Larry Rosenman:
http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD
This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day.
Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1..
On 01.05.15 17:11, Reindl Harald wrote:
Content analysis details: (14.9 points, 5.5 required)
pts
Test of the list.
Regards,
KAM
Am 01.05.2015 um 20:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 01.05.15 11:17, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Reindl's test showed it is hitting URIBL and it looks like it's also a
good candidate for raising your SPF score and Bayesian training.
I wouldn't say so... for getting standard required_score
Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with
this error:
Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling
production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986.
On 2015-05-02 15:40, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:
X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2
Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99
has
an FP rate that's
On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:
http://pastebin.com/4gck7uLD
This one and one's like it seem to get through multiple times/day.
Any help here? Today's is WITH 3.4.1..
X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2
Consider increasing the
On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:
X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2
Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has
an FP rate that's negligible compared with the FP rate of spamassassin
Am 01.05.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Forrest:
Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with
this error:
Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling
production of a PID file: exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986.
On 2015-05-02 14:39, Art Greenberg wrote:
I just moved from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 and am seeing messages from SA in
maillog that I've not seen before. Do they indicate an issue with my
installation?
Here is a segment from the log. This pattern repeats each time SA
processes a message. The use of
On 2015-05-01 20:34, Forrest wrote:
Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with
this error:
Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without signaling
production of a PID file:
exit 255 at /usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986.
I've seen this
Seeing this in most of the markups
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs:
Downgrading to 3.4.0 fixed the problem. So, this is definitely a bug.
Just not certain where it is yet. I don't have time to go digging at
the moment. Anyone else have this?
Am 01.05.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Forrest:
Downgrading to 3.4.0 fixed the problem. So, this is definitely a bug.
Just not certain where it is yet. I don't have time to go digging at
the moment. Anyone else have this?
jesus christ provide informations about your environemt
On 1 May 2015, at 14:34, Forrest wrote:
Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start,
with this error:
Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or timed out without
signaling production of a PID file: exit 255 at
/usr/local/perl/bin/spamd line 2986.
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 21:04 -0500, Chris wrote:
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 02:01 +, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else.
So everywhere I have 192.168.0.1 change it to just read 127.0.0.1. I'll
do that, thanks.
That appears to have
Is there any reason
reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error
to fail t_dkim_invalid
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid
This only occurs since upgrade 3.4.0 - 3.4.1, no
The line for URILocalBL is commented out - I had not enabled it.
On May 2, 2015 7:08:10 PM Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
On 2015-05-02 14:39, Art Greenberg wrote:
I just moved from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 and am seeing messages from SA in
maillog that I've not seen before. Do they
Seeing this in most of the markups
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
I installed Bind9 as a caching name server and AFAICT it's
Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else.
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501tel:850-250-5590;501 | Mobile -
850-890-2543tel:850-890-2543
Fax - 850-254-2955tel:850-254-2955 | Toll Free -
877-699-FLUXtel:877-699-FLUX
Web -
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 02:01 +, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Use only 127.0.0.1 as your DNS in /etc/resolv.conf ... Nothing else.
So everywhere I have 192.168.0.1 change it to just read 127.0.0.1. I'll
do that, thanks.
--
Jeremy McSpadden | Flux Labs
Local - 850-250-5590x501 | Mobile -
22 matches
Mail list logo
