Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
Note that plus addressing, users can only subscribe, is 2 + valid in mailto: ?

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
Reject list-id in mta stage, and this template have no unsubscribe links, what a catcher

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Axb
does this work? header LIST_ID_MARKET_EEK List-ID =~ /emarketeerz/ On 21.05.2015 19:31, Forrest wrote: I'm having a problem with a spammer who is using Google Groups as a base. They manage to re-subscribe people, etc., and it's hosted on a private domain, so I can't get to the panel to

Re: Testing SPF DKIM configurations

2015-05-21 Thread Matt Vernhout
You can try https://validator.messagesystems.com It does require registration, but you get some pretty detailed information back. ~ Matt Vernhout @emailkarma http://emailkarma.net Please excuse any typos or short forms, sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2015, at 20:20, Philip Prindeville

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On May 21, 2015 11:08:28 PM Bill Cole sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote: On 21 May 2015, at 14:42, Benny Pedersen wrote: Note that plus addressing, users can only subscribe, is 2 + valid in mailto: ? Sure, why not? See RFC's 821, 822, 2821, 2822, 5321, and 5322 :) There is

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Forrest
On 5/21/15 5:36 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On May 21, 2015 11:08:28 PM Bill Cole sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote: On 21 May 2015, at 14:42, Benny Pedersen wrote: Note that plus addressing, users can only subscribe, is 2 + valid in mailto: ? Sure, why not? See RFC's 821,

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Bill Cole
On 21 May 2015, at 14:42, Benny Pedersen wrote: Note that plus addressing, users can only subscribe, is 2 + valid in mailto: ? Sure, why not? See RFC's 821, 822, 2821, 2822, 5321, and 5322 :) There is nothing special about '+' in an email address in SMTP or in the email data format. It is

Re: local.cf, user_prefs etc

2015-05-21 Thread Dave Funk
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Dmitry Baronov wrote: Hello folks! I use 3.4.1 freebsd version with compiled rules. Please, give me advice how I could use local config file to override downloaded default values? All my attemps were unsuccessful. I placed local.cf and user_prefs files in

local.cf, user_prefs etc

2015-05-21 Thread Dmitry Baronov
Hello folks! I use 3.4.1 freebsd version with compiled rules. Please, give me advice how I could use local config file to override downloaded default values? All my attemps were unsuccessful. I placed local.cf and user_prefs files in /root/spamassassin /etc/mail/spamassassin

Re: local.cf, user_prefs etc

2015-05-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.05.2015 um 15:48 schrieb Dmitry Baronov: Hello folks! I use 3.4.1 freebsd version with compiled rules. Please, give me advice how I could use local config file to override downloaded default values? All my attemps were unsuccessful. I placed local.cf and user_prefs files in

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Bill Cole
On 21 May 2015, at 17:36, Benny Pedersen wrote: On May 21, 2015 11:08:28 PM Bill Cole sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote: On 21 May 2015, at 14:42, Benny Pedersen wrote: Note that plus addressing, users can only subscribe, is 2 + valid in mailto: ? Sure, why not? See RFC's

Re: user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2015-05-21 16:47, Forrest wrote: On 5/21/15 5:36 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On May 21, 2015 11:08:28 PM Bill Cole sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote: On 21 May 2015, at 14:42, Benny Pedersen wrote: Note that plus addressing, users can only subscribe, is 2 + valid in mailto: ?

user_prefs custom rules, not matching

2015-05-21 Thread Forrest
I'm having a problem with a spammer who is using Google Groups as a base. They manage to re-subscribe people, etc., and it's hosted on a private domain, so I can't get to the panel to report the domain. In any case, I wrote a couple of simple rules in user_prefs that /should/ match, but they