Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

2015-09-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 16.09.15 09:50, Bowie Bailey wrote: The SA config is probably a better solution than the bind exemptions. I would say just the opposite. For example, MTA at SMTP level can look up RBLs, and SA would benefit from having records in local cache. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-18 Thread Mark Martinec
Olivier Nicole wrote: "Bill Cole" writes: I noticed today that the hit rate on URIBL* rules had dropped to to zero since my last round of updates, and after many hours of trying to determine why which included reviewing BIND configs and packet

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-18 Thread Mark Martinec
Not to forget the fix at: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202283 which is also needed with Net::DNS 1.01 or later. Sorry, wrong link, should be: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7231 Already cherrypicked in the FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin:

Re: Resume / Doc Spam

2015-09-18 Thread Anthony Kamau
On 09/09/15 07:26, John Schmerold wrote: I haven't had the courage to open in word, if I open in 7zip, I see following files: Directory of C:\ No courage needed. Simply install Sanboxie [0] (preferably in a VM) and you can safely open any application inside the sandbox and see what it

Re: Heads up: Net::DNS update may have quietly broken your SpamAssassin.

2015-09-18 Thread Olivier Nicole
"Bill Cole" writes: > I noticed today that the hit rate on URIBL* rules had dropped to to zero > since my last round of updates, and after many hours of trying to > determine why which included reviewing BIND configs and packet captures > and

Re: Resume / Doc Spam

2015-09-18 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:51:59 +1000 Anthony Kamau wrote: > No courage needed. Simply install Sanboxie [0] (preferably in a VM) > and you can safely open any application inside the sandbox and see > what it invokes. Or use LibreOffice which has macros turned off by default,

Re: URIBL_BLOCKED while using local BIND

2015-09-18 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 9/18/2015 4:25 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 16.09.15 09:50, Bowie Bailey wrote: The SA config is probably a better solution than the bind exemptions. I would say just the opposite. For example, MTA at SMTP level can look up RBLs, and SA would benefit from having records in local

RE: What is the meaning of "host=NULL"

2015-09-18 Thread Ken Johnson
Bill, Thanks for the helpful reply. I performed a reverse lookup on several of the IPs, but didn't take the next step of looking up the name in the PTR. Ken On 17 Sep 2015, at 15:35, Ken Johnson wrote: > Spamassassin is run by Exim. > > Spamassassin version: > X-Spam-Checker-Version: