On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:53:16 -0700
Larry Goldman wrote:
> From http://spamassassin.apache.org:
>
> > Latest News
> >
> > 2015-04-30: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 has been released! Highlights
> > include:
> >
> > improved automation to help combat spammers that are abusing new
> > top level domains;
>
I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how
valuable it is to continue training with collected spam that is
properly tagged with BAYES_999.
Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the
database on emails it can already detect? Should I only be training
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 19:17 +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2015 at 19:02:27 (EU time), ClaudeWSmith wrote:
>
> > I am an OLD time user of SPAMPal.
> >
> > But, SPAMPal does not work in my new 64 Bit machine.
> >
> > I have Windows 7, and Thunderbird.
> >
> > What version of
On 02.10.15 13:15, Andrew Davidson wrote:
I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how
valuable it is to continue training with collected spam that is
properly tagged with BAYES_999.
Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the
database on emails it can
Am 02.10.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Andrew Davidson:
I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how valuable it is
to continue training with collected spam that is properly tagged with BAYES_999.
Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the database on
