Re: Benchmarking SA

2016-07-15 Thread RW
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:00:59 -0400 Olivier Coutu wrote: > On 2016-07-15 10:22, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > > Am 15.07.2016 um 16:06 schrieb Olivier Coutu: > >> I am trying to figure out what part of SA is taking the most time > >> on certain e-mails, e.g > >> > >> time spamassassin

Re: Benchmarking SA

2016-07-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.07.2016 um 18:00 schrieb Olivier Coutu: On 2016-07-15 10:22, Reindl Harald wrote: just use spamassassin -D which gives you some timing informations, most likely DNS - DNSBL/DNSWL/URIBL Some DNS lookups indeed seem to take a certain amount of time, but the first 4-second hop cannot be

Re: Benchmarking SA

2016-07-15 Thread Olivier Coutu
On 2016-07-15 10:22, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.07.2016 um 16:06 schrieb Olivier Coutu: I am trying to figure out what part of SA is taking the most time on certain e-mails, e.g time spamassassin ham-1468528393442166.eml [...] real0m34.531s user0m33.958s sys0m0.452s I have

Re: Benchmarking SA

2016-07-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.07.2016 um 16:06 schrieb Olivier Coutu: I am trying to figure out what part of SA is taking the most time on certain e-mails, e.g time spamassassin ham-1468528393442166.eml [...] real0m34.531s user0m33.958s sys0m0.452s I have installed HitFreqsRuleTiming and the timing

Benchmarking SA

2016-07-15 Thread Olivier Coutu
I am trying to figure out what part of SA is taking the most time on certain e-mails, e.g time spamassassin ham-1468528393442166.eml [...] real0m34.531s user0m33.958s sys0m0.452s I have installed HitFreqsRuleTiming and the timing result file has specific rules that takes