DNS resolution issue

2016-09-26 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
I found some posts on the web indicating that, if spamd is having trouble doing DNS resolution, it's probably because of a bum entry in /etc/resolv.conf. I don't think that's the case here, though, so I'm coming to the list... My logs are full of runs like this: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53

Trying to compile/build SA/latest from cpan on a BananaPi/Raspbian 

2016-09-26 Thread Jari Fredriksson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trying to compile/build SA/latest from cpan on a BananaPi/Raspbian  Vastaanottaja SpamAssassin Users  Päiväys Tänään 21:24 Liitetiedostot Digitaalinen allekirjoitus (181 t) Show options Viestin runko Vahvistettu

Trying to compile/build SA/latest from cpan on a BananaPi/Raspbian

2016-09-26 Thread Jari Fredriksson
sa_compile tests fail. t/sa_compile.t 1/? # Failed test 1 in t/sa_compile.t at line 149 Not found: FOO = check: tests=FOO at t/sa_compile.t line 150. # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 755

Re: HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH and explanation

2016-09-26 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:16:43 -0400 Joe Quinn wrote: > On 9/26/2016 8:54 AM, RW wrote: > > Informational rules do that, but IIRC __RULES are simply a special > > case. > > > Hmm, you're probably right on that point. I can't find anything in > the source that behaves that way, but the

Re: HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH and explanation

2016-09-26 Thread Joe Quinn
On 9/26/2016 8:54 AM, RW wrote: Informational rules do that, but IIRC __RULES are simply a special case. Hmm, you're probably right on that point. I can't find anything in the source that behaves that way, but the documentation claims that's how it works and I also don't see anything to

Re: HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH and explanation

2016-09-26 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:26:27 -0400 Joe Quinn wrote: > On 9/25/2016 9:25 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 07:57:37PM -0400, Alex wrote: > >> I think the rule still has a use, perhaps in a meta or something. > > I believe (though don't quote me on this) that a zero-weight

Re: HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH and explanation

2016-09-26 Thread Joe Quinn
On 9/25/2016 9:25 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 07:57:37PM -0400, Alex wrote: I think the rule still has a use, perhaps in a meta or something. I believe (though don't quote me on this) that a zero-weight rule will still be checked if it's used as part of a metarule.

Re: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

2016-09-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.09.16 10:21, Maik Linnemann wrote: Additional: i have a limited number of Mails that are still not tagged. those mails doesnt regard to the mail size limit scenario as they are for example between 35kb ans 100kb or so and i have a limit of 2MB. anyone have a clue how to figure out whats

AW: AW: X-Spam Tagging - Spam Status YESNO Flags - Sometimes not appended...

2016-09-26 Thread Maik Linnemann
Additional: i have a limited number of Mails that are still not tagged. those mails doesnt regard to the mail size limit scenario as they are for example between 35kb ans 100kb or so and i have a limit of 2MB. anyone have a clue how to figure out whats happening? conspicuous most of those