On 2018-03-09 09:26, David Jones wrote:
> RAZOR like DCC and PYZOR shouldn't be used as a sole source of
> determining spam. These are indicators that combine with other rule
> hits and scores to be one of many factors. If the score was 10 or
> more then you would worry about reporting FPs.
On 03/09/2018 08:58 AM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300
Robert Boyl wrote:
Hi, everyone
Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor?
Havent analysed big amount of emails yet, but Ive had a few cases
where it causes very strange false positives that make no sense.
and adds a lot
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:09:40 -0300
Robert Boyl wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor?
>
> Havent analysed big amount of emails yet, but Ive had a few cases
> where it causes very strange false positives that make no sense.
>
> and adds a lot of points...
>
>
Hi, everyone
Just wondering, whats your thoughts on Razor?
Havent analysed big amount of emails yet, but Ive had a few cases where it
causes very strange false positives that make no sense.
and adds a lot of points...
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.36, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 2.43, RAZOR2_CHECK
