Hello,
I have just upgraded SA from 3.4.1 to 3.4.2.
OS: Centos 6.10
spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.4.2
running on Perl version 5.10.1
During message scanning there are errors in /var/log/maillog:
Sep 20 11:50:38 spamd[13369]: Use of uninitialized value $( in numeric ne
(!=) at
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:58:07 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 8:35 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > unfortunately, secnap is not the only mirror with which the problem
> > occurs.
> > - is this possible problem with mirrors?
> > - when do mirrors update?
> > - do mirrors updates
On 9/20/2018 8:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
I will have to check later if someone else can't check today. I am at
a customer location where I don't have good VPN connection out and
will be traveling this evening. I can check tomorrow if it can wait.
On 20.09.18 09:05, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
It
On 9/20/2018 6:35 AM, Alex Woick wrote:
> Kevin A. McGrail schrieb am 19.09.2018 um 22:28:
>>
>> Alex, sought isn't published, correct? We have to get sought2 relit now
>> that 3.4.2 is in the can.
>>
> Correct, sought isn't published with 3.4.2. It's only in the 3.4.1
> Fedora/Redhat rpm
On 9/20/2018 9:03 AM, micah anderson wrote:
> "Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
>
>> There are people asking me to put KAM.cf under the default sa-update
>> crypto signature. Technically, it's easy. But it would have to be
>> carefully considered as it's not a project ruleset. Thoughts on that?
> I
On 9/20/2018 8:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> I will have to check later if someone else can't check today. I am at
> a customer location where I don't have good VPN connection out and
> will be traveling this evening. I can check tomorrow if it can wait.
It can wait. Matus also had the issue
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> There are people asking me to put KAM.cf under the default sa-update
> crypto signature. Technically, it's easy. But it would have to be
> carefully considered as it's not a project ruleset. Thoughts on that?
I would be interested in KAM as part of an update
On 9/20/18 7:58 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/20/2018 7:18 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:08:24 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I (imho too often) get problems when running sa-update (Debian 8, SA
3.4.0)
found at /usr/bin/curl Sep 5 07:38:31.810 [16137] dbg:
On 9/20/2018 8:35 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> unfortunately, secnap is not the only mirror with which the problem
> occurs.
> - is this possible problem with mirrors?
> - when do mirrors update?
> - do mirrors updates propagate atomically?
Dave, is there an issue where DNS is being updated
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:08:24 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I (imho too often) get problems when running sa-update (Debian 8, SA
3.4.0)
found at /usr/bin/curl Sep 5 07:38:31.810 [16137] dbg:
http: /usr/bin/curl -s -L -O --remote-time -g --max-redirs 2
--connect-timeout 30 --max-time 300
On 9/20/2018 7:18 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:08:24 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> I (imho too often) get problems when running sa-update (Debian 8, SA
>>> 3.4.0)
>>>
>>
>>> found at /usr/bin/curl Sep 5 07:38:31.810 [16137] dbg:
>>> http: /usr/bin/curl -s
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:08:24 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I (imho too often) get problems when running sa-update (Debian 8, SA
3.4.0)
found at /usr/bin/curl Sep 5 07:38:31.810 [16137] dbg:
http: /usr/bin/curl -s -L -O --remote-time -g --max-redirs 2
--connect-timeout 30 --max-time 300
Kevin A. McGrail schrieb am 19.09.2018 um 22:28:
Alex, sought isn't published, correct? We have to get sought2 relit now
that 3.4.2 is in the can.
Correct, sought isn't published with 3.4.2. It's only in the 3.4.1
Fedora/Redhat rpm distributions until now, from where it should be
removed by
13 matches
Mail list logo
