Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread Henrik K
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 03:43:14PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > > Sure. Grep them into your user_prefs file with whitelist_from. > > grep From: to get all the Drom lines, then put hose > into user_refs in the form > > whitelist_from > > This is probably a spectacular bad idea? It will also

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote: On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote: On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote: What is the Bayes score for the missed spam? This is from a missed spam. How do I see the bayes score? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13)

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread Bill Cole
On 17 Mar 2019, at 17:03, James wrote: I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the "required" number. About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. Be careful. The default scores are set based on an analysis of scored ham and spam corpora with a

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread James
On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote: On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote: I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the "required" number. About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. I run an IMAP server with my own spamassassin. I have

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread James
On 2019-03-17 5:45 p.m., John Hardin wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote: I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the "required" number. About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes. Are you also capturing a

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread David Jones
On 3/17/19 4:03 PM, James wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the > "required" number. > > About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. > > I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes. > Is there a way to whitelist all the email addresses in my

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread John Capo
On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the > "required" number. > > > About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. What is the Bayes score for the missed spam? > I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes. Unless you

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread John Hardin
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote: I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the "required" number. About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes. Are you also capturing a spam corpus and learning from that? Bayes

Re: more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread @lbutlr
On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote: > I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the "required" > number. This is not the way to limit spam, it simply raises the false-positive. > About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. I would say that your

more spam is getting through :-(

2019-03-17 Thread James
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the "required" number. About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes. Is there a way to whitelist all the email addresses in my inboxes?