On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:16:59 +0300
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> John Hardin kirjoitti 15.4.2019 1:33:
> > On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >
> >> Now, I am part of RuleQA. Should I accept everything and pass it
> >> so SpamAssassin and to my corpus or not?
> >
> > I would suggest
John Hardin kirjoitti 15.4.2019 1:33:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Now, I am part of RuleQA. Should I accept everything and pass it so
SpamAssassin and to my corpus or not?
I would suggest yes, you should accept everything that reaches your
spamtrap addresses and include it
David Jones kirjoitti 14.4.2019 23:31:
Once you get this type of platform setup, it can be used for other spam
fighting techniques on the primary mail filters like:
- train your shared redis Bayes DB with the ham and spam folder
I have similar system including the Redis, SpamCop, Pyzor and
Bill Cole kirjoitti 14.4.2019 21:13:
On 14 Apr 2019, at 4:03, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
How can I best support SpamAssassin besides having a mass check
automation and mirrors for the sa-update?
Those are both large contributions. Thank you for that support.
The obvious repository of things
