Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 4/18/19 9:05 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 18 Apr 2019, at 12:32, Sam wrote: >> I guess I’ll have to raise some scores to make it learn. > Reconsider. The message was clearly marked as spam with a score more than 6 > times the threshold. There is nothing here to train, SA did its job. You have a

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 18 Apr 2019, at 12:32, Sam wrote: > I guess I’ll have to raise some scores to make it learn. Reconsider. The message was clearly marked as spam with a score more than 6 times the threshold. There is nothing here to train, SA did its job. -- Light thinks it travels faster than anything but

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:56:25 +0200 Sam wrote: > Dear fellow SpamAssassin users, > > I’ve read everything I could find on scoring and autolearning before > posting here, and yet cannot figure why autolearn triggers properly in > the presence of ham but never triggers when SpamAssassin is fed

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 4/18/19 8:19 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 18 Apr 2019, at 11:56, Sam wrote: >> However, even with heavy spam, autolearn does not seem to engage in spam >> mode. > Why do you think it should? > > Did you check the message with spamassassin -D? > > You might want to read this: > >

Re: Question about scoring and autolearning

On 18 Apr 2019, at 11:56, Sam wrote: > However, even with heavy spam, autolearn does not seem to engage in spam > mode. Why do you think it should? Did you check the message with spamassassin -D? You might want to read this: --

Question about scoring and autolearning

Dear fellow SpamAssassin users, I’ve read everything I could find on scoring and autolearning before posting here, and yet cannot figure why autolearn triggers properly in the presence of ham but never triggers when SpamAssassin is fed spam. My global settings for SpamAssassin 3.4.2 launched

Re: Office 365 Org tag

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:07:36 + David Jones wrote: > I would like to use the AskDNS plugin to query a private DBL that I > can populate/manage. The idea is to subtract a few points for > inbound O365 domains that have been seen before in an effort to help > block compromised O365 accounts

Re: SA shortcircuit

On 4/18/19 1:55 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > Good day Guys > > Would anyone be willing to share their shortcircuiting list. > > Currently I am just shortcircuiting CLAMAV, Im looking to improve SA. > > Many thanks. > > Regards > Brent shortcircuit ALL_TRUSTED off shortcircuit USER_IN_WHITELIST on

Re: Spammer in white list aka USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL

@lbutlr wrote > Is there a reason you didn't disclose the IP address? That domain is NOT > listed in the current 60_whitelist_spf.cf Sorry, header excerpt got cut-off by nabble: List-Unsubscribe:

Re: Whitespace in urls

On 4/17/2019 9:24 AM, RW wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:00:26 +0100 RW wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:44:32 -0400 buy wrote: Hi, I've been encountering spammers putting whitespace in the domain area of a url. My rule is not catching them. ... Spamassassin rule looks like this (NO MATCH):

Re: Spammer in white list aka USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL

Hi David Thanks a lot for your reply. Please find the redacted headers of the message mentioned above: https://pastebin.com/sjix9CDp (sorry, nabble removed the headers in the initial post) Cheers Jan -- Sent from: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Users-f3.html

SA shortcircuit

Good day Guys Would anyone be willing to share their shortcircuiting list. Currently I am just shortcircuiting CLAMAV, Im looking to improve SA. Many thanks. Regards Brent