Re: __YOU_WON_01 FP on *won’t* with right single quotation mark

2019-06-10 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Olivier Coutu wrote: https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/ I understand that a single quote should be used when writing /won't/, but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01 hits on /won’t/ with a right single quotation mark. Apparently this can happen automatically in

Re: __YOU_WON_01 FP on *won’t* with right single quotation mark

2019-06-10 Thread Bill Cole
On 10 Jun 2019, at 14:43, Olivier Coutu wrote: https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/ I understand that a single quote should be used when writing /won't/, but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01 hits on /won’t/ with a right single quotation mark. Apparently this can happen automaticall

Re: __YOU_WON_01 FP on *won’t* with right single quotation mark

2019-06-10 Thread @lbutlr
On Jun 10, 2019, at 12:43 PM, Olivier Coutu wrote: > I would suggest a second negative lookahead to correct the issue. If the rule doesn’t hit enough spam, the score goes down. It doesn’t matter if it’s esoterically correct or not. -- If it wasn't for the pirates, I bet Star Wars: Ep III woul

Re: Proposed rule for too many dots in From

2019-06-10 Thread Paul Stead
://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20190610-r1860930-n/T_AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS/detail 3 days good performance on ruleqa equals promotion followed by a scoring day. On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 19:13, Amir Caspi wrote: > On Jan 26, 2019, at 10:27 AM, John Hardin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Amir Caspi wrote:

__YOU_WON_01 FP on *won’t* with right single quotation mark

2019-06-10 Thread Olivier Coutu
https://regex101.com/r/SUqMxn/1/ I understand that a single quote should be used when writing /won't/, but it's probably not the first time __YOU_WON_01 hits on /won’t/ with a right single quotation mark. Apparently this can happen automatically in certain text editors when there are two apo

Re: Proposed rule for too many dots in From

2019-06-10 Thread Amir Caspi
On Jan 26, 2019, at 10:27 AM, John Hardin wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Amir Caspi wrote: > >> On Jan 15, 2019, at 8:46 AM, John Hardin wrote: >>> On Dec 20, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Amir Caspi wrote: > > headerAC_FROM_MANY_DOTS From =~ /<(?:\w{2,}\.){2,}\w+@/ >>> >>> Argh

Re: Extra debug output for -D

2019-06-10 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Shreyansh Shrivastava. wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:04 PM @lbutlr wrote: On 10 Jun2019, at 11:29, Shreyansh Shrivastava. < shreyansh.171co...@nitk.edu.in> wrote: Hey everyone is there a way to add an extra DEBUG output for "spamassassin -D” ? I don’t understand th

Re: Extra debug output for -D

2019-06-10 Thread Shreyansh Shrivastava.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:04 PM @lbutlr wrote: > On 10 Jun2019, at 11:29, Shreyansh Shrivastava. < > shreyansh.171co...@nitk.edu.in> wrote: > > Hey everyone is there a way to add an extra DEBUG output for > "spamassassin -D” ? > > I don’t understand the question. What are you trying to do? > I a

Re: Extra debug output for -D

2019-06-10 Thread @lbutlr
On 10 Jun2019, at 11:29, Shreyansh Shrivastava. wrote: > Hey everyone is there a way to add an extra DEBUG output for "spamassassin > -D” ? I don’t understand the question. What are you trying to do? -- A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated

Extra debug output for -D

2019-06-10 Thread Shreyansh Shrivastava.
Hey everyone is there a way to add an extra DEBUG output for "spamassassin -D" ? Thanks, Shreyansh Shrivastava