Re: Yahoo abuse contacts?

2020-06-11 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Sure. I will email you off list. -- Forwarded message - From: John Hardin Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 22:12 Subject: Yahoo abuse contacts? To: SpamAssassin Users List Does any list denizen have direct connections into Yahoo? Their abuse@ and postmaster@ addresses have been

Yahoo abuse contacts?

2020-06-11 Thread John Hardin
Does any list denizen have direct connections into Yahoo? Their abuse@ and postmaster@ addresses have been undeliverable for a week or two, apparently due to a misconfiguration. I've tried reporting it via their web page but haven't gotten any response yet. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

RE: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Marc Roos
> > bullshit - your crap idea is sending active messages and that's not a > NDR and always wrong in case of fighting spam When my mta generates an 554 5.7.1, my server does not even have the senders email address at that time. So it is impossible to send 'active messages' (what ever

RE: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Marc Roos
Hi Jesse, what do you think of my point of view? > > > - you are placing the burden of reducing the spam in your system on all > the non-spam-sending users who wish to communicate with your users. If people want to have their free email, why not let them know about that their provider

RE: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Marc Roos
Hi Alex thanks for the on topic response. Bare with my thoughts. > > - arbitrary valid email addresses are used as sender address by spammers > to avoid being blocking as unknown sender. Whenever one of your users > gets a spam mail, some innocent unknown user gets the "click on the

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Jesse Norell
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 18:50 +0200, Alex Woick wrote: > Marc Roos wrote: > > 4. auto reply with something like (maybe with a wait time of x > > hours): > > Your message did not receive the final recipient. You are > > sending > > from a known spam provider > > network that is why we blocked

Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC error on spamd start: util: refusing to untaint suspicious path: "${exec_prefix}/lib" ?

2020-06-11 Thread PGNet Dev
On 6/11/20 9:19 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: > DCC is built/installed, > > wget http://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/source/dcc.tar.Z > tar zxvf dcc.tar.Z > cd dcc-2.3.167 > ./configure \ > --disable-server \ > --disable-dccm \ > --disable-dccifd > make >

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Alex Woick
Marc Roos wrote: 4. auto reply with something like (maybe with a wait time of x hours): Your message did not receive the final recipient. You are sending from a known spam provider network that is why we blocked your message. Please confirm that: - you are not a spammer and - you

Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC error on spamd start: util: refusing to untaint suspicious path: "${exec_prefix}/lib" ?

2020-06-11 Thread PGNet Dev
i've built & installed a new instance of spamd -V SpamAssassin Server version 3.4.4 running on Perl 5.26.1 with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 2.067) with zlib support (Compress::Zlib 2.093) running on linux/64.

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
On 11/06/20 10:19, Marc Roos wrote: I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do something like this: 1. received email from adcpni...@gmail.com 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue with 7. 3. system recognizes as this email

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 11:27 +0200, Marc Roos wrote: > > I know I need to update, moving to containerized or centos8 when > ready. > However I do not think it will solve much, that is why I am asking > for > this procedure. > You could always write a private rule the adds points to gmail users

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.06.20 11:27, Marc Roos wrote: I know I need to update, moving to containerized or centos8 when ready. However I do not think it will solve much, that is why I am asking for this procedure. I agree that training spam on that machine will help more. BAYES_999 gives score of 3.7, while

RE: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Marc Roos
I know I need to update, moving to containerized or centos8 when ready. However I do not think it will solve much, that is why I am asking for this procedure. -Original Message- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 11:24 To:

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 11.06.20 11:04, Marc Roos wrote: I have got lots of shit coming from *.google.com like these: Received: from spam1.x.xxx ([212.26.193.45]) by .xx.xx with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:35:01 +0200 I guess this is your mail relay Received:

RE: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Marc Roos
I have got lots of shit coming from *.google.com like these: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from spam1.x.xxx ([212.26.193.45]) by .xx.xx with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:35:01 +0200 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com

Re: handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 09:20, Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do > something like this: > > 1. received email from adcpni...@gmail.com > 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue > with 7. > 3. system

handling spam from gmail.

2020-06-11 Thread Marc Roos
I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do something like this: 1. received email from adcpni...@gmail.com 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue with 7. 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before 4. auto reply