On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, RW wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 10:05:21 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, RW wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:10:18 +
RW wrote:
However, I can't get an up-to-date Firefox to add .com, so the
feature may already be obsolete.
I take that back, it does.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 10:05:21 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, RW wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:10:18 +
> > RW wrote:
> >
> >
> >> However, I can't get an up-to-date Firefox to add .com, so the
> >> feature may already be obsolete.
> >
> > I take that back, it
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, RW wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:10:18 +
RW wrote:
However, I can't get an up-to-date Firefox to add .com, so the feature
may already be obsolete.
It take that back, it does.
What does it do for the example at hand, http://www.ch ?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Tobi skrev den 2020-11-06 17:51:
ah understand, should have better checked what SA really adds to domain
list. So both versions are checked. Just bad luck if the expanded
version of the uri domain (ex ch.com) has a blacklisting at uribl or
spamhaus ;-)
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:10:18 +
RW wrote:
> However, I can't get an up-to-date Firefox to add .com, so the feature
> may already be obsolete.
It take that back, it does.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 09:32:39 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Tobi skrev den 2020-11-06 17:51:
> > ah understand, should have better checked what SA really adds to
> > domain list. So both versions are checked. Just bad luck if the
> > expanded version of the uri domain (ex ch.com) has a
Tobi skrev den 2020-11-06 17:51:
ah understand, should have better checked what SA really adds to domain
list. So both versions are checked. Just bad luck if the expanded
version of the uri domain (ex ch.com) has a blacklisting at uribl or
spamhaus ;-)
But that's another story
Have a good
