Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Jared Hall
On 1/26/2021 5:04 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: running version 3.42. I added a rule in local.cf and restarted spamd. (systemctl restart spamd.service) It hit. Changed the score on it and an existing rule and did a restart and they it but neither score changed. Ran lint (spamassassin -D

Re: apache.org is blacklisted

2021-01-26 Thread Bill Cole
On 26 Jan 2021, at 20:57, Benny Pedersen wrote: On 2021-01-27 02:43, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote: http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html i dont know how to handle this :=) Only one lists it:

Re: apache.org is blacklisted

2021-01-26 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote: Have you opened an infra ticket? no, can i do this ? You need an Apache account. I have one ready to go, I was just waiting for your answer. ...created. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21351 -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

Re: apache.org is blacklisted

2021-01-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-01-27 02:43, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote: http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html i dont know how to handle this :=) Only one lists it: https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/3.227.148.255

Re: apache.org is blacklisted

2021-01-26 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote: http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html i dont know how to handle this :=) Only one lists it: https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/3.227.148.255 https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/2a01:4f9:c010:567c:0:0:0:1 SPFBL? but

apache.org is blacklisted

2021-01-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html i dont know how to handle this :=) but forward to infra so its solved

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-01-27 01:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: No. I am a bit puzzled by what Benny Pedersen suggested, running lint without local.cf. Never tried it, or read anything, but presume the inference is it should have failed? it was unclear to me if you added rules to local.cf that did not lint or

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> On 26 Jan 2021, at 17:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > >> running version 3.42. > > Presumably you meant 3.4.2... > > Unless that's a distro-patched variant, such as the ones RH and Debian > produce, you should update to 3.4.4. There are significant security, > performance, bugfix, and

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >> >> On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > >>> Any suggestions? > > does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ? Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too late for more

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Bill Cole
On 26 Jan 2021, at 17:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: running version 3.42. Presumably you meant 3.4.2... Unless that's a distro-patched variant, such as the ones RH and Debian produce, you should update to 3.4.4. There are significant security, performance, bugfix, and functionality

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >> Any suggestions? does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ? >>> >>> Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too >>> late for more coffee.

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:04:17 -0500 > Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > > >> Ran lint (spamassassin -D --lint) and noticed numerous (20-30 ?) >> "__E_LIKE_LETTER," in sequence, followed by >> > "__GATED_THROUGH_RCVD_REMOVER,__HAS_FROM,__HAS_MESSAGE_ID,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_S >

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: Any suggestions? does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ? Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too late for more coffee. spamd was stopped at the time.

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread RW
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:04:17 -0500 Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > Ran lint (spamassassin -D --lint) and noticed numerous (20-30 ?) > "__E_LIKE_LETTER," in sequence, followed by > "__GATED_THROUGH_RCVD_REMOVER,__HAS_FROM,__HAS_MESSAGE_ID,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_SUBJECT,__KHOP_NO_FULL_NAME,__LOWER_E," > with

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>> On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >> Any suggestions? >> >> does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ? > > Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too > late for more coffee. spamd was stopped at the time.

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > >> Any suggestions? > > does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ? Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too late for more coffee.

Re: results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: Any suggestions? does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?

results from lint

2021-01-26 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
running version 3.42. I added a rule in local.cf and restarted spamd. (systemctl restart spamd.service) It hit. Changed the score on it and an existing rule and did a restart and they it but neither score changed. Ran lint (spamassassin -D --lint) and noticed numerous (20-30 ?)

Re: Update for Composite Blocklist (CBL) Users

2021-01-26 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
On 1/25/21 9:16 AM, Axb wrote: Posting this to avoid surprises: As of the first week of 2021, the Composite Blocklist (CBL) is being retired. See: https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/803/ Hi, thanks Axb for pointing this out, but, just to be clear, the CBL itself is not being retired