On 1/26/2021 5:04 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
running version 3.42.
I added a rule in local.cf and restarted spamd. (systemctl restart
spamd.service) It hit. Changed the score on it and an existing rule and did a
restart and they it but neither score changed.
Ran lint (spamassassin -D
On 26 Jan 2021, at 20:57, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-01-27 02:43, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html
i dont know how to handle this :=)
Only one lists it:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Have you opened an infra ticket?
no, can i do this ?
You need an Apache account. I have one ready to go, I was just waiting for
your answer. ...created.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21351
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On 2021-01-27 02:43, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html
i dont know how to handle this :=)
Only one lists it:
https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/3.227.148.255
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html
i dont know how to handle this :=)
Only one lists it:
https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/3.227.148.255
https://matrix.spfbl.net/en/2a01:4f9:c010:567c:0:0:0:1
SPFBL?
but
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/2a01%3A4f9%3Ac010%3A567c%3A%3A1.html
i dont know how to handle this :=)
but forward to infra so its solved
On 2021-01-27 01:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
No. I am a bit puzzled by what Benny Pedersen suggested, running lint
without local.cf. Never tried it, or read anything,
but presume the inference is it should have failed?
it was unclear to me if you added rules to local.cf that did not lint or
> On 26 Jan 2021, at 17:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
>> running version 3.42.
>
> Presumably you meant 3.4.2...
>
> Unless that's a distro-patched variant, such as the ones RH and Debian
> produce, you should update to 3.4.4. There are significant security,
> performance, bugfix, and
>> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
>>> Any suggestions?
>
> does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?
Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused.
Too
late for more
On 26 Jan 2021, at 17:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
running version 3.42.
Presumably you meant 3.4.2...
Unless that's a distro-patched variant, such as the ones RH and Debian
produce, you should update to 3.4.4. There are significant security,
performance, bugfix, and functionality
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> Any suggestions?
does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?
>>>
>>> Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too
>>> late for more coffee.
>On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:04:17 -0500
> Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
>
>> Ran lint (spamassassin -D --lint) and noticed numerous (20-30 ?)
>> "__E_LIKE_LETTER," in sequence, followed by
>>
> "__GATED_THROUGH_RCVD_REMOVER,__HAS_FROM,__HAS_MESSAGE_ID,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_S
>
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Any suggestions?
does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?
Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too
late for more coffee.
spamd was stopped at the time.
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:04:17 -0500
Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> Ran lint (spamassassin -D --lint) and noticed numerous (20-30 ?)
> "__E_LIKE_LETTER," in sequence, followed by
> "__GATED_THROUGH_RCVD_REMOVER,__HAS_FROM,__HAS_MESSAGE_ID,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_SUBJECT,__KHOP_NO_FULL_NAME,__LOWER_E,"
> with
>> On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>>
Any suggestions?
>>
>> does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?
>
> Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too
> late for more coffee.
spamd was stopped at the time.
> On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>
>> Any suggestions?
>
> does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?
Just renamed local.cf and get the same results. Now I am more confused. Too
late for more coffee.
On 2021-01-26 23:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Any suggestions?
does it lint if local.cf is empty or non exists ?
running version 3.42.
I added a rule in local.cf and restarted spamd. (systemctl restart
spamd.service) It hit. Changed the score on it and an existing rule and did a
restart and they it but neither score changed.
Ran lint (spamassassin -D --lint) and noticed numerous (20-30 ?)
On 1/25/21 9:16 AM, Axb wrote:
Posting this to avoid surprises:
As of the first week of 2021, the Composite Blocklist (CBL) is being
retired.
See:
https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/803/
Hi,
thanks Axb for pointing this out, but, just to be clear, the CBL itself
is not being retired
19 matches
Mail list logo