and if you want to become an hero patches to document those evals are
always
welcome ;-)
Well, if I use undocumented code I have to figure out, I always do my own
documentation, since my memory these days is about five minutes long. The
trick for me will be figuring out how I could submit
On 11 Feb 2021, at 10:36, Kris Deugau wrote:
After a close look again at Thunderbird I've apparently been
misreading one of the about:config flags (javascript.enabled),
although if it's not for email HTML rendering I'm not sure what it's
used for.
Thunderbird will open links in its own
On 2021-02-11 12:58 pm, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I've had good luck with using mariadb and galera to share the spamassassin
>> database across systems. I run a small 3-node setup for email, 2x servers
>> running dovecot replicating to each other, and a 3rd galera quorum server.
>> Mariadb
On Thursday 11 February 2021 at 17:21:41, deano-spamassas...@areyes.com wrote:
> Is there an easy/efficient way of converting an existing mariadb bayes
> database to redis?
>
> Perhaps "sa-learn --backup", set up redis, then restore?
On 2021-02-11 9:54 am, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> There is no real question, but what I would like to find out is (and to ask),
> does it scale and are any pitfalls? Naturally, we would look at doing HA, but
> am asking for that any comment, any tip, any opinion on using redis for
> bayes. Been
Kris Deugau wrote:
Thunderbird and Seamonkey both have it supported and enabled out of the
box. I would not be surprised if Outlook did, along with no way to
disable it. Mac Mail probably does, again likely with at best a tedious
hassle to disable it. Windows Mail (AKA "the descendant of
On 2021-02-11 14:56, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-11 12:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
With the updated Esp plugin[¹] just committed to trunk you could use
Sendgrid files downloaded from Invaluement as well as local generated
files.
this files do
Hi,
> > There is no real question, but what I would like to find out is (and to
> > ask), does it scale and are any pitfalls?
> > Naturally, we would look at doing HA, but am asking for that any
> > comment, any tip, any opinion on using redis for bayes.
>
> Been using it from day one (I'm party
On 11 Feb 2021, at 8:55, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:52:59AM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
>> There is a received_within_months() eval in the HeaderEval plugin which
>> someone wrote at some point but failed to suitably document or even use.
>> There are also private
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-11 12:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
With the updated Esp plugin[¹] just committed to trunk you could use
Sendgrid files downloaded from Invaluement as well as local generated
files.
this files do work if sendgrid did not allow non
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:52:59AM -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2021, at 7:00, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a lot of spams that all have a series of completely bogus
> > Received headers in them. A characteristic of these headers is a
> > rather improbable datestamp, considering
On 11 Feb 2021, at 7:00, Loren Wilton wrote:
I'm getting a lot of spams that all have a series of completely bogus
Received headers in them. A characteristic of these headers is a
rather improbable datestamp, considering today's date:
Received: from 69-171-232-143.mail-mail.facebook.com
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 2/9/21 10:03 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
got one more today
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/167.89.112.86.html
envelope sender is not sendgrid.net
On 2021-02-11 12:46, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
With the updated Esp plugin[¹] just committed to trunk you could use
Sendgrid files downloaded from Invaluement as well as local generated
files.
this files do work if sendgrid did not allow non sendgrid.net envelope
senders :(
KAM_SENDGRID_REDIR
On 2021-02-11 13:00, Loren Wilton wrote:
Anyone know an easy way to check for a Received header date more than
say a week old and add some points?
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/69.171.232.143.html
why is date important ?, spamassassin do test it already
DATE_IN_PAST *
I'm getting a lot of spams that all have a series of completely bogus
Received headers in them. A characteristic of these headers is a rather
improbable datestamp, considering today's date:
Received: from 69-171-232-143.mail-mail.facebook.com ([69.171.232.143])
by
On 2/9/21 10:03 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-02-02 03:25, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Since it's already hitting 8.9, why do more?
>
> got one more today
>
> http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/167.89.112.86.html
>
> envelope sender is not sendgrid.net
>
> spamurls to the phishing is
On 2/10/2021 11:30 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
CONFIRMED: SeaMonkey v2.53.6 (latest version) DOES NOT execute
JavaScript in email.
I don't think the intent is to run it in the MUA. It's probably
distributed as an attachment (ie. inline) to save to disk and be viewed
outside the MUA in a normal
18 matches
Mail list logo
