Tobi, can you open a bug about this and add a spample of the issue? ch is
in the TLD list 20_aux_tlds.cf.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:56 AM Tobi
Those can be ignored. They are by design.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 9:26 AM Dean Carpenter <
deano-spamassas...@areyes.com> wrote:
> On 2020-11-18
TxRep could have some bugs but I've not found it to cause a FP in years
so it's generally safe for production use. Do you have an email that might
replicate the issue?
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
Hi Dan,
Milters are the glue that change the email. SpamAssassin is just giving
data back to the milter.
I believe you will find that X-Spam-Status header is being built by
spamass-milter not by spamassasin. You need to change the milter code to
keep track of the user and add it to the
On 2021-03-13 21:08, RW wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:22:53 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but
insufficiently trained...
It doesn't.
it could be added so when its not trained show its needs more data
meta BAYES_NOT_TRAINED
- Message from a...@onet.eu -
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:16:25 +0100
From: a...@onet.eu
Subject: sa-update error 3 no mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Hi,
I'm getting this from cron since two days:
channel: no 'mirrors.sought.rules.yerp.org'
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:22:53 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
> I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50 hits when bayes is enabled but
> insufficiently trained...
It doesn't.
Are there any BAYES hits on their messages, ham or spam? BAYES_{not
50} would be a positive confirmation. I'm not sure offhand if BAYES_50
hits when bayes is enabled but insufficiently trained...
In one email, I'm seeing this:
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
I *think* I now I have site-wide bayes filtering working now for all users on
a server. I've edited /etc/spamassassin/local.cf to include "bayes_path" and
"bayes_file_mode" and I don't see any errors about permissions being wrong
from debian-spamd in
I *think* I now I have site-wide bayes filtering working now for all
users on a server. I've edited /etc/spamassassin/local.cf to include
"bayes_path" and "bayes_file_mode" and I don't see any errors about
permissions being wrong from debian-spamd in mail.log.
But rather than guessing, I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo