On 20210317 22:55:26, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-03-18 04:47, Bill Cole wrote:
On 17 Mar 2021, at 23:39, jdow wrote:
2(oO0)7.net all are registered to the same people.
Note that this is just 2 domains registrations: 2o7.net and 2O7.net
are the same thing.
spamassassin see it as X
On 2021-03-18 04:47, Bill Cole wrote:
On 17 Mar 2021, at 23:39, jdow wrote:
2(oO0)7.net all are registered to the same people.
Note that this is just 2 domains registrations: 2o7.net and 2O7.net
are the same thing.
spamassassin see it as X-Spam-Uri-Domains-Ham: 7.net
hmm
On 17 Mar 2021, at 23:39, jdow wrote:
2(oO0)7.net all are registered to the same people.
Note that this is just 2 domains registrations: 2o7.net and 2O7.net are
the same thing.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresse
On 20210317 20:26:32, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-03-18 04:17, Bill Cole wrote:
On 17 Mar 2021, at 22:35, Loren Wilton wrote:
Has anyone come across 102.122.2O7.net before?
Ever heard of Adobe?
They do web-bugs in addition to graphics software.
+1
chrome://settings/content/siteDetails
On 2021-03-18 04:17, Bill Cole wrote:
On 17 Mar 2021, at 22:35, Loren Wilton wrote:
Has anyone come across 102.122.2O7.net before?
Ever heard of Adobe?
They do web-bugs in addition to graphics software.
+1
chrome://settings/content/siteDetails?site=http%3A%2F%2F102.122.2o7.net
On 17 Mar 2021, at 22:35, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Has anyone come across 102.122.2O7.net before?
Ever heard of Adobe?
They do web-bugs in addition to graphics software.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Curren
I just got what appears to be a legit email from my ISP.
It has a tracker tag pointing to 102.122.207.net.
Note that is a site name and not a dotquad.
Somehow this doesn't make me real comfortable with the possible veracity of
the email.
Has anyone come across 102.122.2O7.net before?
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400
Kris Deugau wrote:
> My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
> just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It also
> reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail
> automatically expiring out of Bayes, lead
Steve Dondley wrote:
I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw it
into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the whole
pile.
It dawned on me that this will get very slow as I ev
On 16.03.21 13:16, Steve Dondley wrote:
I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw
it into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the
whole pile.
It dawned on me that this will ge
10 matches
Mail list logo
