Fair enough. :-) I mean when it gives it negative scoring though.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 11:35 AM RW wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:11:03
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:11:03 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Would be worth looking at how it got through. Perhaps badly trained
> Bayesian learning, for example?
If it's done well it can look like a hybrid of a real paypal email and
a routine gmail email and Bayes isn't capable of spotting
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 00:36:05 +1000
Simon Wilson wrote:
> I've just migrated and updated to SA 3.4, and have moved the Bayes db
> to Redis. I used to use AWL but don't think the module is loaded in
> 3.4, am I correct?
It's just a matter of uncommenting the line in v310.pre
I don't think it
Loren, are you using the KAM ruleset? See mcgrail.com under projects and
you can add the channel. Happy to look at spamples too for something like
that but I haven't seen a fake paypal in a while likely because of the
rules.
Would be worth looking at how it got through. Perhaps badly trained
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Simon Wilson wrote:
I've just migrated and updated to SA 3.4, and have moved the Bayes db to
Redis. I used to use AWL but don't think the module is loaded in 3.4, am I
correct?
There seems to be mixed commentary online about whether to enable it - I'll
leave it off for
I've just migrated and updated to SA 3.4, and have moved the Bayes db
to Redis. I used to use AWL but don't think the module is loaded in
3.4, am I correct?
There seems to be mixed commentary online about whether to enable it -
I'll leave it off for a few weeks and see how it goes, but am
On 2021-03-20 11:19, @lbutlr wrote:
On 19 Mar 2021, at 17:11, Loren Wilton wrote:
I just got this little wonder, and was surprised that it got thru as
ham.
From: "PayPal Billing"
I've fixed that locally, but I'd think SA ought to have a rule for
"PayPal" that doesn't come from paypal.
On 19 Mar 2021, at 17:11, Loren Wilton wrote:
> I just got this little wonder, and was surprised that it got thru as ham.
>
> From: "PayPal Billing"
>
> I've fixed that locally, but I'd think SA ought to have a rule for "PayPal"
> that doesn't come from paypal.
It does, but it looks at the
