Please convert all source code to ASCII. If it fails to compile, then it may
have a trojan hiding in Unicode clothing.
Instructions unclear.
Please convert all source code to ASCII. If it fails to compile, then it may
have a trojan hiding in Unicode clothing.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021, Bill Cole wrote:
The most common reason for SA to hit its internal timeout is the combination
of a rule with a pattern that can generate a large number of backtracks while
scanning (exponential or factorial order) and a message which causes such
backtracking. Typically that
On 2021-11-02 at 19:15:33 UTC-0400 (Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:15:33 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
I have a systeem with postfix and spamassassin 3.4.6 via spamd. It's
been generally running well. I noticed mail from one of my other
systems timing out and 471, and that caused me to loo
Bill Cole writes:
> It would generally be a bad idea to increase the Postfix timeout, as
> that passes the problem back upstream as senders will generally time
> out at 300s as well.
>
> So, add '--timeout-child=295' to your spamd arguments if you want to
> make spamd timeout faster than Postfix
On 2021-11-02 at 19:15:33 UTC-0400 (Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:15:33 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
I have a systeem with postfix and spamassassin 3.4.6 via spamd. It's
been generally running well. I noticed mail from one of my other
systems timing out and 471, and that caused me to loo
