On 7/17/23 6:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
because we have 2023 and in the last decade everybod with a brain was
using spf and sender-spoofing-rejection fro envelopes
I wish that was the case.
There was a recommendation on mailop less than a week ago that people
only set up SPF records to appea
On 17/07/2023 20:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Noel Butler skrev den 2023-07-16 02:05:
it's why anyone who whitelists gmail is a fool (much like those who
use gmail in the first place), we in fact add a positive score for all
google/gmail connections
you still have bigger signature then google/g
Grant Taylor via users skrev den 2023-07-17 23:25:
On 7/16/23 5:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why accept local envelope SENDER domains on port 25 ?
Do you subscribe to any mailing lists that don't rewrite the sender?
what ?
Return-Path:
i recieve verp return path with i don't unverp here,
On 7/17/23 4:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Alias expansion does this
is not a mailing list
What definition are you using for a mailing list?
Do you consider Majordomo to be a mailing list?
Because as far as I'm concerned, alias expansion in the MTA is where
mailing lists originated.
in the
On 7/17/23 4:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
no single mailing-list on this planet does this - period
Can we agree to disagree?
Maybe no /contemporary/ mailing list. But there have been -- and I
contend still are -- LOTS of mailing lists that did / do this very thing.
.forward does this.
Alias
On 7/16/23 5:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why accept local envelope SENDER domains on port 25 ?
Do you subscribe to any mailing lists that don't rewrite the sender?
Thus your mail server would receive messages that you sent to the
mailing list as your SENDING domain on port 25 inbound from th
Thomas Cameron skrev den 2023-07-17 17:54:
On 7/16/23 17:57, Benny Pedersen wrote:
back to basic:
why accept local envelope SENDER domains on port 25 ?
its safe to reject them
its not a question on spf or stupid srs rewrites
That's actually a great point. So you're saying to tell sendmail t
On 7/17/23 11:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
-
for rejecting spoofed envelopes nothing easier than that
you need to have a full list of addresses you receive mail anyways, so
any message with one of those addresses without authentication can be
safely rejected
main.cf smtpd_recip
On 7/16/23 17:57, Benny Pedersen wrote:
back to basic:
why accept local envelope SENDER domains on port 25 ?
its safe to reject them
its not a question on spf or stupid srs rewrites
On 17.07.23 10:54, Thomas Cameron wrote:
That's actually a great point. So you're saying to tell sendmail to
On 7/16/23 17:57, Benny Pedersen wrote:
back to basic:
why accept local envelope SENDER domains on port 25 ?
its safe to reject them
its not a question on spf or stupid srs rewrites
That's actually a great point. So you're saying to tell sendmail to
reject emails purporting to come from me
Noel Butler skrev den 2023-07-16 02:05:
it's why anyone who whitelists gmail is a fool (much like those who
use gmail in the first place), we in fact add a positive score for all
google/gmail connections
you still have bigger signature then google/gmail on public maillists
Matija Nalis skrev den 2023-07-17 06:13:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Another way to do this is to build either a mail archive or a database
of addresses you've sent mail to and simply add a positive score to
mail
from anybody who you've sent mail to: this n
12 matches
Mail list logo
