Re: Really hard-to-filter spam

2023-08-02 Thread Thomas Cameron via users
On 8/2/23 15:52, David B Funk wrote: Regardless, if a message has never been seen before and has little correlation to earlier messages its Bayes should hit someplace in the 40% to 60% range. The fact that it hit 00% indicates a strong correlation to lots of ham (or something is screwy

Re: My apologies

2023-08-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
Marc skrev den 2023-08-02 22:23: I like Reindl! Is anyone training spamassassin on his emails??? ;P why ?, if its good for bayes, why should it be bad at all for humans then ?

Re: My apologies

2023-08-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
Thomas Cameron via users skrev den 2023-08-02 21:39: I'm sorry for posting that. i just maked a sieve autoreader, so i don't need to read it self, good or bad, i don't know :) no need to sorry loosing mail imho

Re: Really hard-to-filter spam

2023-08-02 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Thomas Cameron via users wrote: Thank you very much. The message that slipped through today was NOT one of the ones being discussed in this thread, it was a different format and totally different message. I only included it to demonstrate that my server was not being

RE: My apologies

2023-08-02 Thread Marc
> > > I've blocked him on my mail server, as well. > > Reindl now and then says something useful, but as you have noticed his > people skills are somewhere in the negative 200 score level. I don't > know > that I'd block him, but you do need to take anything he says witha few > horselicks of

Re: My apologies

2023-08-02 Thread Loren Wilton
I've blocked him on my mail server, as well. Reindl now and then says something useful, but as you have noticed his people skills are somewhere in the negative 200 score level. I don't know that I'd block him, but you do need to take anything he says witha few horselicks of salt.

Re: My apologies

2023-08-02 Thread Antony Stone
On Wednesday 02 August 2023 at 21:39:31, Thomas Cameron via users wrote: > I was notified privately that Reindl Harald is blocked on this list. I > replied to him and accidentally polluted the list with more of his > toxicity. I apologize, and I've blocked him on my mail server, as well. We've

Re: Really hard-to-filter spam

2023-08-02 Thread Thomas Cameron via users
On 8/2/23 14:32, Dave Funk wrote: On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Thomas Cameron via users wrote: Wow! What a charming response! You must be a LOT of fun at parties, and have lots of friends! Please don't feed the troll. There's a reason that Reindl is blocked from this list. I was not aware, and

My apologies

2023-08-02 Thread Thomas Cameron via users
I was notified privately that Reindl Harald is blocked on this list. I replied to him and accidentally polluted the list with more of his toxicity. I apologize, and I've blocked him on my mail server, as well. I'm sorry for posting that. -- Thomas

Re: Really hard-to-filter spam

2023-08-02 Thread Dave Funk
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Thomas Cameron via users wrote: Wow! What a charming response! You must be a LOT of fun at parties, and have lots of friends! Please don't feed the troll. There's a reason that Reindl is blocked from this list. No, I did not get that response. I don't have any of

Re: Really hard-to-filter spam

2023-08-02 Thread Thomas Cameron via users
On 8/2/23 13:28, Reindl Harald wrote: then i bet you have the same "RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS" as the OP which means you are not capable to operate a mailserver https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/ throwen against our spamfilter it would be blocked without any question - above 8.0 points

Re: Really hard-to-filter spam

2023-08-02 Thread Thomas Cameron via users
On 7/28/23 00:23, Bill Cole wrote: 1. There are milters/content-filters that decode Base64 message parts (amavisd-new, mimedefang, etc) for processing by SA. 2.  There are still sufficiently unique items: First-Name-Only, Mixed-Case word in the Subject (NLP modeling), and a Base-64 encoded