e all pending DNS queries were complete and before the fixed
timeout deadline was reached. The most common cause is a DNS-based rule
configured to shortcircuit while other queries are outstanding.
--
Bill Cole
se it in another. I don't have a working rule for you, but that's the
mechanism I would use.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
-characters escaped.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
expensive to execute perl and have it load the
many SpamAssassin modules needed to learn a message.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
('%',_DOMAIN_) ORDER BY username ASC
Is there a bug when parsing the preferences from sql?
It's not really a parsing error, it's a configuration error. You cannot
set "use_pyzor" or "use_razor" in user preferences, as they are both
restricted to system-wide config.
be assuming there's a TLD after it.
I agree. That's a step too far. The days when appending .com was a
reasonable tactic for qualifying hostnames are long gone.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses
system
administration, not bad code or distribution config.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
e active site-specific rule management (and FP avoidance) than most
systems ever receive.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
On 2024-05-10 at 14:15:56 UTC-0400 (Fri, 10 May 2024 14:15:56 -0400)
Bill Cole
is rumored to have said:
> On 2024-05-09 at 18:19:14 UTC-0400 (Thu, 9 May 2024 15:19:14 -0700)
> jdow
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> On 20240509 15:05:46, Thomas Barth wrote:
>>> Am 2024
enough performers to get included in
the daily active list will still be pulled into the active list with a trivial
score if derivative meta rules which are good enough for real scores depend on
them.
--
Bill Cole
a rules that have more significant scores, but are not significantly
spam or ham signs on their own.
--
Bill Cole
ell enough to in the active list.
If your system generated that hit, it is one of your own local rules. If it
came from elsewhere, ask them.
--
Bill Cole
ing to adopt SRS or any other mechanisms to avoid SPF
breakage to ever change. There is no ROI in trying to fix such cases
individually but users still want their college email addresses to work decades
after graduating and some colleges have pandered to them. So have some
professional orgs.
--
the pre-check prep. It may be
relevant what you have set report_type to in your local config.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
On 2024-05-09 at 08:37:06 UTC-0400 (Thu, 09 May 2024 14:37:06 +0200)
Benny Pedersen
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole skrev den 2024-05-09 14:22:
In fact, I can't think of any whitelist test that should pass if SPF
fails.
If you operate on the theory that a SPF failure is always a sign
ules if a specific rule hits. This will also skip any other
'late' checks, so you have to set priorities with care to avoid
shortcircuiting rules that you want checked. Consult the docs for
details.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billm
SSAGE (and hence also ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE) is
fairly unlikely to be spam, but we have pegged the scores for all the
*BOUNCE_MESSAGE rules at 0.1 just to make sure that they are always published
and visible as control points that can be used by sites that have a particular
need to accept (or shun) some or all bounces.
--
Bill Cole
I believe we are in solid agreement, a few notes below explaining how...
On 2024-04-14 at 08:00:19 UTC-0400 (Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:00:19 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> Bill Cole writes:
>
>> On 2024-04-12 at 18:56:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:56:15 -0400)
&g
t; trigger. YMMV and YAMV (Attitude).
FWIW, we can't maintain SA to accommodate the obstinacy of gated BITNET
LISTSERV nodes in '89. The only reasons for unsub difficulties in 2024 are
technical failures and spammer excuses. Modern SpamAssassin is only supposed to
deal with modern realities,
st has lost alignment with its
origins. The original was a tactical mitigation against heavy phishing in a
largely unauthenticated-sender world, deployed in part to forestall extreme
responses to the problem of everyone claiming to send Paypal notifications to
everyone.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com
On 2024-04-12 at 18:56:15 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:56:15 -0400)
Greg Troxel
is rumored to have said:
> I see it very slightly differently, but mostly agree
>
> Bill Cole writes:
>
>> 1. We serve our users: receivers, not senders. Senders claiming FPs
>> need the su
this if you have a directory full of fresh spam
whose senders you want to shun:
cd $spamdirectory
spamassassin --add-to-blocklist *
And if you have a bunch of mail you value in a directory, use "-W"
instead.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpyboz
being added to the default welcomelist.
As with everything SpamAssassin: input from users and other contributors is
eagerly desired...,
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
een promulgated and
accepted by the PMC or the user community.
More to follow in a separate thread.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
p; sa1 run the same spamassassin/spamd configurations, neither of
> them add the X-Spam-ASN headers. All other add_header entries work fine.
Validate that configs on both machines match. In this sort of setup, only the
SA config on the spamd hosts of the user spamd is run as makes any difference.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
annel for config and etermine which config files are
actually being used by spamd and by spamassassin. (spamc knows nothing of SA
configs...)
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
f complex
multipart/alternative messages with HTML or (WORSE) pure HMTL. Modern
MUAs recognize URLs in plaintext and for basic confirmations like this,
you should keep the message as simple, clear, and unadorned as possible.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @gr
g the port spamd uses for testing. That is rare because it
selects an unused high port on the loopback interface for the test run,
but if you have a very tight network security policy in place, that can
fail. SELinux and AppArmor can also interfere.
Thanks Tuc
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 10:46 AM
is set with the "-s" option, as
documented in the man page.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
186.
# Failed test at t/SATest.pm line 926.
t/spamd_client.t .. 52/52 # Looks like you failed 14
tests
of 52.
t/spamd_client.t .. Dubious, test returned 14 (wstat
3584,
0xe00)
Failed 14/52 subtests
Any indications as to the issue?
Thanks, Tuc
--
Bill Cole
On 2024-03-21 at 13:21:54 UTC-0400 (Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:21:54 +0100)
is rumored to have said:
> On 3/20/24 21:58, Bill Cole wrote:
>> I'm not sure how I've not noticed before, but unless I'm missing something,
>> there is no way to replicate the [block,welcome]list
On 2024-03-21 at 12:08:48 UTC-0400 (Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:08:48 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
On 20.03.24 16:58, Bill Cole wrote:
I'm not sure how I've not noticed before, but unless I'm missing
something, there is no way to replicate the [block,welcome]list
On 2024-03-21 at 11:57:43 UTC-0400 (Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:57:43 -0400)
Kris Deugau
is rumored to have said:
Bill Cole wrote:
I'm not sure how I've not noticed before, but unless I'm missing
something, there is no way to replicate the [block,welcome]list
functionalities of the spamassassin
for this missing functionality?
I don't expect that it would be difficult to add. (Something I've
believed every time I've taken on a coding task...)
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available
gt;
>> Curiously, NOBODY has received any breach notifications from Microsoft,
>> despite personal information being compromised.
>>
>> What has anyone else experienced?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- Jared Hall
>>
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
real problem.
All set then. SA is not the right tool for you. Try something like Exim,
MailMunge, or MIMEDefang that let you write arbitrary code for the
mail-handling flow. I suppose you may be able do it in sendmail.cf too,
if you're into self-torture.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com
utter uselessness in the '90s.
Aside from the fact that this would do active damage to the
comprehensibility of some perfectly legitimate messages, it would
invalidate any sort of authenticating signature (DKIM, PGP, S/MIME,
whatever)
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
dns_available set to 'no'
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
, Bill Cole wrote:
If spammers can 'abuse' ALL_TRUSTED you have a major problem. Either
a serious misconfiguration or compromised machines in
trusted_networks.
Can't ALL_TRUSTED happen if spammer delivers mail directly to my
network,
or, if last mail server removes Received: headers?
I think
in trusted_networks.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
les. There are non-obvious
fingerprints in some spam that imply decades-long spamming operations.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
going to run cpan with force because that may hide *real*
errors.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
is not so big.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
m puzzled by this.
--
Written by Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel on his
21399th day.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
ming service because it is forwarding
spam. If users POP their mail instead of having it forwarded via SMTP,
that does not happen.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO6PR20MB3698
And there's that correlating nonce again...
I don't know if any of those thoughts will give ideas for good actual
rules for you (or anyone) but they are what comes to mi9nd when I look
at thos
-critical.
In my experience it has been workable to just reject mail with .xls and
.xlsx attachments by default at any Internet-facing MX. 20+ years of
warnings about how reckless it is to share MS documents ought to suffice
for anyone.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
with proper training.
*IN THEORY* one could fix a corrupted DB by 'unlearning' messages which
learned incorrectly, but as a practical matter that's usually a fantasy.
Most of the scanning and DB details that you included are not useful.
You cannot fix the bad DB, you need to rebuild it.
--
Bill
to 5/12 and it's back to 200 ~ 5000 ms.
Note: I also have some personal rules.
Am I the only one seeing this?
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
to" and "all_spam_to". Users in the first level may
still
get some spammish mails blocked, but users in "all_spam_to"
should
never get mail blocked.
Those are all implemented through rules which you can adjust scores for
and/or shortcircuit
, while it uses its own proprietary formats internally.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
cousin MailMunge both use a unique
working directory for each message, and it is trivial to just replicate
that whole structure elsewhere for safekeeping.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available
l with this bullocks and gotten it resolved?
Yes. Twice.
Time is your friend. AT still operates like it's 1970...
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
it should be doing,
>> except that it gives back 0 instead of 5 or 6.
>>
> It seems to be a documentation bug, see
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6069 and
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=1201#c47
>
Documentation fixed
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
for asking
this is the log entry, just forget about it.
'man spamd' provides more info.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
it, you'd need to create it yourself.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
n. Consult
the author of 'w7_whitelist.cf' for support of whatever configuration it
includes.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
th.cf
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1912923.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
def_whitelist_auth *@*.subaru.com
def_whitelist_auth *@*.aexp.com
-def_whitelist_auth *@*.usssa.com
def_whitelist_auth *@*.bestwesternrewards.com
def_whitelist_auth *@*.email-weightwatchers.com
def_whitelist_auth *@*.email-allstate.com
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 8:48 AM Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2023
aren't open to being used for mischief and can justify the removal later
if asked to. The bar for removal is very low (being listed is a
privilege, not a right) but it can't be simply 'someone said...'
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:25 PM Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2023-10-11 at 16:45:15 UTC-0400
in
60_welcomelist_auth.cf with def_welcomelist_auth/def_whitelist_auth
entries with *@*.usssa.com.
If anyone has a shareable sample spam to substantiate this, that would
be helpful.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses
ues of how to integrate a 'preprocessor' with your
existing MTA and whatever yopu're using as 'glue' for SA.
(content_filter script, spamass-milter, MIMEDefang, etc.)
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently
autolearn it as spam, and (hopefully) recognize its sibling
messages as such.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
f such
violence if you compel it.)
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
ault scores don't make
sense
to me.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
ATTR publish
On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 04:37:15 PM GMT+2,
wrote:
On 9/14/23 16:24, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2023-09-14 at 04:37:03 UTC-0400 (Thu, 14 Sep 2023 17:37:03 +0900)
Joe Wein via users
is rumored to have said:
I filed a bug for this issue on Bugzilla (#8186) but so far no
r
best approach may not be in trying to parse the
bogus tag to glean a domain that may or may not be known to be bad, but
rather to detect the general pattern, which is itself a direct indicator
of bad intent.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.sccon
9.23 09:07, Bill Cole wrote:
I believe that anyone with committer status in the SA repo can fix
it.
At first I was mystified by your problem description, but I believe I
have fixed the issue (corrected the anchor in the referring link to
"DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block")
I meant that the ht
locklists-dnsbl-block")
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
. Essentially a very 'small'
rule is duplicative of the detection being effectively done by a network
source.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
despise...)
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
nk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AuthRes.pm?r1=1907938=1907937=1907938
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
Sleeping 5 -
Retry # 19
You cannot expect the build-time tests to succeed if you run them as
root OR on a machine already running spamd. If this is not clear from
reading the test documentation in the source distribution, please think
about how we can make it clearer and make a sugges
is
available for everyone.
Some inactivity timeout should lock the url again.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
files on their website do not work.
Their main website no longer makes any mention of the UBL.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
in Unicode
handling was made between 3.4.x and 4.x and some distros that
cherry-pick improvements may have backported fixes into what they call
'3.4.6'.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
; marks and the like)
that break the pattern and for lookalike non-ASCII characters (often
Cyrillic or Greek) in the target string.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
or so.
Paul Vixie and I had both posted about how a 'reverse MX' or 'Mail
Sender' record in DNS might work prior to that (and Paul credited
someone else with the original idea) but those were not fully-developed
mechanisms that anyone could actually deploy.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com
ctives reverse the actions of
welcomelist and blocklist directives.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
sound reasons and they have not
had security problems with it, in many years of operations. What you
choose to do should be based on what YOU want.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available
ternally. See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DebugChannels
for details.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
,
PYZOR_CHECK=1.392, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01]
--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 121 116
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many
On 2023-06-20 at 12:33:05 UTC-0400 (Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:33:05 +0200)
Patrick Proniewski
is rumored to have said:
On 20 Jun 2023, at 17:49, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2023-06-20 at 09:39:04 UTC-0400 (Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:39:04 +0200)
Patrick Proniewski
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
I'm running
amavis/tmp/.spamassassin271224psFL1itmp
132K/var/lib/amavis/tmp/.spamassassin27122814VcUntmp
228K/var/lib/amavis/tmp/.spamassassin271228ITPqiKtmp
8,0K/var/lib/amavis/tmp/.spamassassin271228MHHOoPtmp
For test I downgrade one spamassassin from 4.x to 3.4.6 and problem
not exists
any idea ?
--
--
B
On 2023-06-06 at 01:32:14 UTC-0400 (Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:32:14 +0300)
Henrik K via users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:12:10AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
Escape the @ with a \
SA uses Perl, so you need to escape %, @, and $ in regular
expressions.
Perl regular expressions
FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL From =~ /client@client\.com/i
Escape the @ with a \
SA uses Perl, so you need to escape %, @, and $ in regular expressions.
I think "spamassassin --lint" will catch unescaped special characters in
rules, and it is always a good idea to run that when you add or change
rules.
--
B
support but no later activity.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
gt; X-Mailer: Zendesk Mailer
> X-Zendesk-From-Account-Id: 83f40dd
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zendesk.com;
> q=dns/txt; s=zendesk2; t=168488;
> bh=hZXuEvY/OemVRfx2BSZkm7AF9OUMlXdBZZugXDZhHF0=;
>
> ...
>
>
> Thierry
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
On 2023-05-12 at 15:16:59 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 May 2023 21:16:59 +0200)
Matija Nalis
is rumored to have said:
> But I was more interested if SA already has something like that?
It does not.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.
with names containing
TO_EQ_FROM in the default rule channel. Consult the rules files for
implementation details.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
on something which is only
wrong *IN YOUR HEAD* is hard.
ADSP and DMARC both exist apart from DKIM. It is an entirely valid
choice to NOT use them.
(surely this is doable in a plugin; it's not conceptually hard)
Feel free to implement it on your own and report back the results.
--
Bill Cole
b
:17 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
On Apr 28, 2023, at 10:24 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 28.04.23 um 18:11 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55
-0600)
Philip Prindeville
is rumored
On 2023-04-28 at 12:11:02 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:11:02 -0600)
Philip Prindeville
is rumored to have said:
On Apr 25, 2023, at 6:28 AM, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55 -0600)
Philip Prindeville
is rumored to have said:
I thought
) and the message header From address
(RFC5322.From) which are not intrinsically identical but usually are in
person-to-person email.
The *actual* definition of that rule will be somewhere in your SA
config, most likely in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc
that your analysis of what
is happening is not entirely wrong.
You may be able to nail down what is actually happening by scanning a
problematic message with "-D all" and determining *exactly* what SA is
parsing as a URI that it should not.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@
On 2023-04-24 at 16:32:55 UTC-0400 (Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:32:55 -0600)
Philip Prindeville
is rumored to have said:
I thought the matching included subdomains, and seem to remember that
working.
It never has. At least not in the past 17 years.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc
n antispam SDK to be
combined with spamassassin?
What gap in SA are you trying to fill?
I'm reading "SDK" as "Software Development Kit" and your query is just
not making sense to me in connection to SA.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache
there...
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
1 - 100 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
