On Fri, June 15, 2007 08:20, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sa-update --nogpg
can't resolve localhost to address at
/usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm
line 751. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
A
On Fri, June 15, 2007 15:13, WLamotte wrote:
Sorry if this is an obvious question but why isn't there an option for
Spamassassin to bounce spam? Sure it does a good job at filtering spam but I
don't want it from my web(mail)server to my inbox. I want my web- or
mailserver to bounce
On Wed, June 13, 2007 10:08, Oenus Tech Services wrote:
I'm thinking of disabling fuzzyocr for the time being until the problem
is solved. However, fuzzyocr is still doing a good job on other files. Does
anybody have
a suggestion or clue on how to solve this? Is there a way for fuzzyocr to
On Tue, June 12, 2007 13:33, Justin Mason wrote:
Daniel J McDonald writes:
So, you can't build the RPM as root.
I just added all of the various groups to my user, set up a user build
directory tree, compiled it under my username and it tested fine, at least
to the point
that it normally
On Sun, May 27, 2007 13:34, David Baron wrote:
FuzzyOcr prep missing from its normal location and a few other errors as well.
What would cause this?
Had the patched and ready originals available to restore the FuzzyOcr stuff.
However, I am still getting this error:
SpamAssassin Mail
On Mon, May 21, 2007 11:03, Mark || Stream Service wrote:
Hello,
In relation to this:
- Is it possible to block all messages that contain an url or sites on
that url? For example to block all messages that have an url to
imageshack.us (and an image from there)?
I posted a suggestion of a
On Fri, May 18, 2007 22:01, Loren Wilton wrote:
Looks like FuzzyOCR should have a field day with that one. ImageInfo
would probably also help.
Unfortunately, it's a hyperlink, not a cid, so OCR wouldn't even see it.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 14:50, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
what's wrong with automatically SA-report messages scoring above a given
threshold (say, 10-12)?
Would it be regarded as *BAD* by DCC, Pyzor, Razor, and/or SC?
I often see that high-scoring messages are reported as spam by some of
the
On Fri, May 18, 2007 15:29, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
1) Your server can be used in a DoS against the distributed services
You mean, by sending valid content on high-scoring mails? Mmmh. Yes, this
may create trouble to DCC, Pyzor and Razor. Not to SC, since they are
mostly interested to
On Thu, May 17, 2007 08:21, fRANz wrote:
Hi.
Some mails are positive to this test.
In wiki section, I can't find any information about it.
Someone could explain me what does it means?!
Regards,
-f
Hint: grep is your friend when searching your rule files.
From the FVGT ruleset (Fred):
On Thu, May 17, 2007 09:00, fRANz wrote:
From the FVGT ruleset (Fred):
header FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+
rdns=[^ ]+\d{1,3}[^0-9]\d{1,3}[^0-9]\d{1,3}[^0-9]\d{1,3}[^ ]+ / describe
FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D Host starts with d-d-d-d
scoreFH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D
On Wed, May 16, 2007 11:02, Cedric BUSCHINI wrote:
Hello everyone,
I m running through a problem generating false negatives :
I m getting e-mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is in the whitelist using whitelist_from in
local.cf .
How can I fix that
On Mon, May 14, 2007 11:32, Matt Hampton wrote:
http://www.coders.co.uk/slipped.through.txt
It has sailed through both a SA3.1.8 and SA3.2.0 (3.2.0-pre2-r512851)
running on recent versions of MailScanner
The ClamAV engine tends to work well on a large number of that type of
phish. Local
On Sat, May 12, 2007 12:49, Alex Woick wrote:
Is it possible to display the version and/or publishing date of the
ruleset in the mail headers, for example in the X-Spam-Checker-Version:
header? So we can see if the ruleset has been kept up-to-date with
sa-update.
It could be done with a
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header and
passing the contents of $header to the code given above.
We have installed the script from rulesemporium to
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:57, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
Chris wrote:
Hi all,
Anyone know if you can get Spamassassin to block and/or
delete emails from certain countries if you are on shared hosting please
?
Any help very much appreciated.
Chris.
Just add a custom rule for matching the
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:37, Chris wrote:
One thing, my hosts say that I'm not able to do this if
I'm on shared hosting - are you saying that there's a
way to do this on shared hosting please ?
Out of the ways that have been kindly recommended here,
which one would be the easiest for a
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:10, BG Mahesh wrote:
On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header
and passing
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:13, Chris wrote:
I will look into that - I would prefer the emails from
some countries to not even reach my pc in the first place - so bearing that
in mind, is procmail still recommended in this instance please ?
If your hosting provider offers procmail, yes. The may
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:29, Chris wrote:
But what happens to the email that fails the threshold
of spam filtering ?
If it's below the threshold, it may get a subject modification, it
probably gets a new header or two. If it's above the threshold, it
probably gets a new header or two, and then
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:13, Chris wrote:
I will look into that - I would prefer the emails from
some countries to not even reach my pc in the first place - so bearing that
in mind, is procmail still recommended in this instance please ?
If your hosting provider offers procmail, yes. The may
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:10, BG Mahesh wrote:
On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2007 09:36, BG Mahesh wrote:
We have tested this on http://cause.greynium.com/spamtest.php
We have constructed a Mail header, concatenating $message to $header
and passing
On Wed, May 9, 2007 10:37, Chris wrote:
One thing, my hosts say that I'm not able to do this if
I'm on shared hosting - are you saying that there's a
way to do this on shared hosting please ?
Out of the ways that have been kindly recommended here,
which one would be the easiest for a
On Tue, April 17, 2007 12:22, BG Mahesh wrote:
hi
I want to pass the comments/text entered by users on a form to
SpamAssassin
for approval. If it approves it only then I want to accept the text, else
I
want to inform the user that the text is Spam and reject the user's
comments.
We use
Yay, spammy has morphed, and the pattern that was working doesn't work
(the morph appears to be making the filenames truly random now):
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6834/mchd6.jpg
http://img444.imageshack.us/my.php?image=5bsoda1.jpg
http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/3335/68jo5.jpg
the
On Mon, April 2, 2007 16:34, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
What I can't figure out is if this is a new kind of spam or if I can
update it using the available rulesets (with sa-update or RDJ).
Search engine, fax scanting software?
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/5553/webvq2.gif
Custom ruleset
On Mon, April 2, 2007 19:14, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Randal, Phil wrote:
A large score for ImageShack uris, not a small one, would seem to
be in order, otherwise a good proportion end up in people's mailboxes.
I'm not familiar with ImageShack - is it public hosting of
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:50, John Rudd wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/stupid_spammer_tricks_01.txt
I'm seeing a few of these today too. In fact, at home, I've had maybe 5
spam messages slip through my defenses today. That's a HUGE increase
for me ... I
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:11, Kosmaj wrote:
Forgive me for spamming the list, but I just realized
that if I just score -10 to long messages, SP will keep on
applying other rules, and it will take long time again.
Therefore, what I need is a rule which will score -10 points
and tell SP
On Monday 11 December 2006 15:57, Duncan, Brian M. wrote:
ISP's client address). The places I've been using it, and the people I
hear about who are using it, have seen a high degree of success.
It can be downloaded from:
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/Botnet.tar
I just
On Monday 11 December 2006 16:16, John Rudd wrote:
Duncan Hill wrote:
I just finished a very quick test of the Botnet tool, and the sheer
number of FPs against eBy mail coming from eBay's servers was staggering
- literally every single mail from eBay. It also, for my testing, hit
On Thursday 07 December 2006 15:11, Justin Mason wrote:
yeah -- there are any number of ways to do this, if requiring admin
configuration is OK -- I'm asking for ways we can automatically
figure it out from SpamAssassin code, without help. ;)
Really and truly, it belongs at the MTA level, not
On Mon, November 20, 2006 15:00, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I am getting pounded by these types of emails. Does anyone else get
these? What rule can I apply to have them killed. It's driving me nuts.
SARE Stock ruleset. Available from fine ninjas everywhere. Well trained
Bayes would probably
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 20 November 2006 15:08, Rick Macdougall wrote:
It's possible that they could send it all twice but I've never seen it.
Remember that some unbelievable number of infected Windows clients are
the main source of spam and it would just be too much trouble for the
On Wed, November 1, 2006 09:27, Suhas \(QualiSpace\) wrote:
How do I catch these types of mails?
Received: from wk-2022 [125.92.211.28] by ourdomain.com
Don't accept mail from non-fully-qualified HELOs ?
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 12:10, Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:
Hi at all, I want to deliver mail marked from spamassassin with SPAM to
admin address and not deliver to the user.
Is possible?
After I want to set this setup to specific email address not all user.
I find in the docs and FAQ but I
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 22:23, Alan Munday wrote:
I've been following your developments and looking at how to integrate with
my (few) systems. But as I don't have a test environment (until I have
built a VMWare one) I was cautious at trying this with one of the live
box's. Zero scoring
On Thursday 07 September 2006 01:58, Chris wrote:
See the headers below, it 'appears' to me that this message went through
the spammers isp before being sent to me or is this just another spammers
'game'?
More inclined to think it's a botnet, and that the bot was either forced to
use the
On Thursday 31 August 2006 08:49, Xueron Nee wrote:
I don't know why njabl.org alse use these data.
http://njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup.cgi?query=220.181.13.1
220.181.13.1 is listed in blackholes.njabl.org: China blocked by
china.blackholes.us
Don't have an IP address in Chinese netspace.
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:19, aurora wrote:
Basically, we now get alot of customers calling us saying that they have
not received our email and it's because it has been held on their spam
server with a score of 6, even though its a plain text email! We have only
been getting these issues
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 10:37, aurora wrote:
ISP's SMTP server which then hits the customers SMTP/POP server. In most
cases, your SMTP server will just find a direct route to the destination
server and only the sending server and receiving server will be involved
without a server being in
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 10:46, Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
I run a qmail frontend for a FirstClass system. The qmail accepts mail for
about 500 domains, hosted on the FirstClass system, and scans them with SA.
In then injects them into FirstClass. If the domain is known, but the user
is
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 11:28, Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote:
Yeah, that is pretty neat. But the Firstclass system is running at 99%
capacity on the E-mail injection too. I mean, we are really pumping it in,
trying to level the peak-priod and everything.
Performing callouts will probably cause
On Monday 07 August 2006 00:02, wrote:
| 2250 0733.com
Here are my numbers from last week:
5006 0451.com
3845 53.com
Not seeing anywhere near as high, but this is only on my personal server:
440733.com
340451.com
110668.com
4 023.com
2 08.com
2 020.com
1
On Monday 07 August 2006 15:20, Obantec Support wrote:
What would 192.com or 118118.com do without these names?
Deal with the fact that the RFCs don't support such names, and petition for a
new RFC that accomodates their names?
Other businesses have had no issues adapting to the requirements
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 08:21, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, August 2, 2006 05:10, John Rudd wrote:
Having also said the same thing ... Doesn't part of Microsoft's
extension to IMAP (called MAPI, oh so original) also support sending
via IMAP?
courier-mta does it and friends
how it
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 13:53, Marc Perkel wrote:
I think what you are doing is a step in the right direction. But imagine
if the users IMAP connection could be used to send mail back up the link
then you wouldn't need to do SMTP to the users at all. All you would
have to do is configure a
On Saturday 29 July 2006 00:33, jdow wrote:
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoth Theo:
Why? us.tt acts as a registrar (www.us.tt - joynic.com), dolling out
anything.us.tt to others, so we want to be able to deal with that.
Same as other country code.tt 2TLDs.
Somebody got VERY
On Friday 21 July 2006 16:07, Golden, James wrote:
Hi all,
I just took over the administration of spamassassin, since my coworker
moved on. I'm not really familiar with a lot of this. The problem I am
having is this:
A user has a legitimatly high AWL score (because of rules determined by
On Saturday 11 March 2006 04:25, NW7US, Tomas wrote:
My scripts are really buttoned down, those that I have written myself.
The perl scripts do use the CGI code, latest. And I do my own regex
stuff. I'll double-check my tests. I just don't yet see how the messages
are getting through. If
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 21:58, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
just a question about the purpose of Long.pm. Am I right asuming, it
just tries to get local machines hostname and domainname. nothing else
additionaly. Correct? Just to ensure, i dont blow anything :)
well, asuming this, a friend
On Sunday 29 January 2006 21:19, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
Hello,
recently i see many of those lines in our syslog:
Jan 29 21:56:06 machine spamd[1951]: Insecure dependency in `` while
running with -T switch at
On Thursday 15 December 2005 15:03, Jon Kvebaek wrote:
Hi,
we get quite a few messages that have no Received: headers. These seem
to cause ALL_TRUSTED to fire (with a negative score of course), which
isn't exactly what I want. Any idea on how I should deal with this
correctly?
How on earth
On Wednesday 23 Nov 2005 15:07, Bowie Bailey wrote:
It's always good to have multiple layers. We have ClamAV on the mail
server and Symantec Corporate Edition on the desktops. I haven't had
any problems with Clam. We had a few Sober.U get through before the
definitions updated, but that's
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 16:38, shenanigans wrote:
I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users.
We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more
aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband.
Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web
On Sunday 16 October 2005 11:27, Bill Maidment wrote:
jdow wrote:
NOW I have to clean the tea off my monitor.
Anyway, what *REAL* programmer drinks tea
Those of us who don't like coffee : Can't stand the smell or taste myself.
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 14:10, Jeffrey N. Miller typed:
Go a lot of spam last night with subject lines Re[2] or [4] or [5]
Most are Cialis or sperm pill spam. Also I received one of these emails
that was addressed to another user???
The To: you see displayed in your mail client is not
On Thursday 25 August 2005 12:31, Chris typed:
Noted this in my syslog this morning, is this another harmless error, or is
something borked somewhere?
Aug 24 21:30:09 cpollock spamd[7745]: bad protocol: header error:
\200__( '$Î__\206 __\2377\200__( '$Ï__
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 20:07, Greg Allen wrote:
Do you have any links to a how-to for the Spamass-Milter? Or does it have
good install info in the docs? If it does a good job and is relatively
easy and light-weight, I would like to try it. I have spent days looking
for something more
On Monday 15 August 2005 14:44, Fettke, Dirk typed:
Sorry, I forgot.
I'm using postfix, amavisd, spamassassin
In my local.cf I have insert these lines like Matt Kettler told me.
header BANNED_SUB1 Subject =~ /viagra/i
score BANNED_SUB1 100
Unfortunately it doesn't work. When i
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 18:13, David B Funk wrote:
Got a spam that contains what appears to be an open http
redirector that is new to me:
http://adserver.adtech.de/?adlink|2.0|340|436977|1|16|AdId=323398;BnId=1;li
nk=target.com (where 'target.com' is the spammer site).
Anybody know anything
On Thursday 14 July 2005 16:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Jul 14, 2005, at 4:14 AM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Received: (qmail 31028 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2005 21:00:29
-
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jul
2005 21:00:29 -
Are you really
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 15:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Received: from 204-161-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.161.204])
by xxx.atco.ca with smtp (Exim )
id 1Dpnum-0001Yc-RY; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 07:56:46 -0600
Deny traffic from \d{1,3}-\d{1,3}-\d{1,3}-\d{1,3}\.fibertel\.com\.ar perhaps.
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:38, liyas_m m typed:
Hi,
I have installed the lastest version of SpamAssassin.
But it doest seem to stop the spam email that coming in to my
server..please help
How do i check whether my configuration is correct.
You may have misconceptions about how SpamAssassin
On Monday 27 June 2005 15:41, Jeff typed:
I have setup spamassassin to delete messages if they are spam and it seems
to work. However, I am still getting some that are being marked. How do I
get them all to be deleted?
SA doesn't delete mails, so you'd have to check the application that does
On Friday 17 June 2005 12:33, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I've been getting multiples of messages from this list recently as if the
list software is sending out a spool again and again. Is the list admin
aware of the problem?
Check the headers and see if there's anything about SMTPSVC and pickup. If
On Friday 03 June 2005 08:10, Loren Wilton typed:
It was basically the spammer makes a zillion new domains, and they all
take time to get into SURBL, so some spam gets through. But they all point
to the same dotted quad, and I can match on that lookup.
If that statement is true, perhaps the
On Thursday 02 June 2005 14:33, Gene Heskett typed:
Greetings;
I rx'd several copies of what I think was a viri yesterday,
purportedly coming from verizon.net, my isp.
A very short text message mentioning my account, with a 60
kilobyte .zip file attached. The thing that bothers me is that
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 15:12, Tim Macrina typed:
I wish to move all spam scored 15 or more to one specific mail
account. I want to do this no matter what account the message was sent
to.
This is not the purpose of SpamAssassin. It merely tags the mail. You will
need to implement this
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 15:21, Tim Macrina typed:
On 6/1/05, Duncan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not the purpose of SpamAssassin. It merely tags the mail. You
will need to implement this quarantine after your mail system calls SA.
On a *nix box this would either be in amavisd
On Monday 23 May 2005 16:02, Joe Borg typed:
incorrectly trained it. Is it possible to upgrade but force spamassassin to
install a new/fresh bayes db?
Remove the bayes files and SA will re-create them.
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 15:05, Thomas Deaton typed:
another newbie here... how do I block a URL with SpamAssassin?
The most SA will ever do is tag your mail for you saying a URL was present.
uri rules do this. You can then filter based on the headers added by SA.
If you never want to ever
On Monday 16 May 2005 12:15, Ronan McGlue typed:
I too have all net tests enabled and have started from a fresh clean new
database friday, and already Im seeing the german spams hit bayes_00...
I dont want to switch autolearning off becuase well i find it incredibly
usefull. i have spam/ham
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 14:12, Ronald I. Nutter typed:
We are getting flooded this morning with email that contains the
following item(s) in the body of the message -
*** Server-AntiVirus: No Virus (Clean)
*** GEORGETOWNCOLLEGE Anti-Virus
*** http://www.georgetowncollege.edu
OR
***
On Thursday 07 April 2005 14:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hello All
Does someone know a linux command to create a mailbox (mbox) without X11 or
KDE.
A mbox mailbox is merely a named file in a location. mkdir, touch. So long as
the directory is there, most MTAs and MDAs can deal with the
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 16:33, Jeff Chan typed:
I'm not getting any of those, but I am seeing a lot of stock
spams.
Ditto, but pretty much all of them are hitting high bayes + other local rules
aimed at stock stuff. The stox guy morphed, but the morph was so trivial it
was funny.
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 03:47, List Mail User typed:
Several people have suggested it. Clearly it is just my latent
paranoia that make me think this way. (Notice, everybody adds yet;
Though it would take a stupid spammer to purposely target this list, such
creatures do exist. Also, I
On Monday 21 March 2005 11:05, Menno van Bennekom typed:
Clever trick. Do legitimate MTAs try to send to the second
highest MXer if the primary is down? If so a fake third MX
(even to a completely unused IP?) may have little downside.
I.e.
@ IN MX 5 realprimary.domain.com
@
On Monday 21 March 2005 15:34, Rosenbaum, Larry M. typed:
We received a drug spam containing the following URL:
http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/supposedtoallow/fdl%2ev%69%61%67%73.co%6d/p/b/
kmioa
This URL will actually take you to fdl.viags.com (which then goes to
www.simply-rx.net). As far
On Friday 11 March 2005 14:17, DNI Support Department typed:
Greetings Jeff:
These are live examples; but it appears the porn spam all follow the same
hex (?) directory structure after the domain name.
Hence, wanting a pattern for that purpose.
IMG
On Sunday 06 March 2005 19:14, Rob Fantini wrote:
Hellom
We use postfix , procmail and spamassassin.
Generally which is the better place to do RBL checks, postfix or
spamassassin?
Do you want to score on RBLs, or reject on RBLs? If you want to score, SA.
If you want to reject outright,
On Saturday 05 March 2005 14:49, martin smith wrote:
|uri SpoofPort_URL /.*\:.*|.*\...:.*/ score SpoofPort_URL 1
Ok MK2 that one could FP on genuine URLs with a port specified
uri SpoofPort_URL /.*\:.*|.*\...:.*/
score SpoofPort_URL 1
uri OkPort_URL
On Thursday 24 February 2005 21:54, Stuart Johnston wrote:
I've been seeing a ton of stock spam this week, no URLs - no SURBL :(
Bayes and Razor, etc pick up on it eventually but to speed things up, I
wrote a rule. One thing that is unique about these messages is that
they replace l's with
On Monday 31 January 2005 15:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] might have typed:
Hello,
I use postfix+spamassassin+maildrop and for now I delivery all the email
tagged as spam to junk folder, this is very nice except most of the mail is
actually spam, so far only one false positive, anyway I would like
On Monday 20 December 2004 20:49, ChupaCabra wrote:
I can see where he gets the idea in that I still see people on the
internets saying bouncing it is good but in all my readings I have
learned better. Or does anyone think bouncing all spam is a good idea.
Backscatter will get you blacklisted
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 15:46, Andy Norris might have typed:
As the subject implies... what would be a good rule to use to make sure all
this talk about spam doesn't end up in my spam trap?
Don't pass list mail through your scanning engine. Best whitelist there is,
and it won't poison
On Monday 13 December 2004 16:58, Kenneth Porter might have typed:
--On Monday, December 13, 2004 5:08 AM -0800 Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flurry of which? No attachment, at least here.
Sorry, I see so many of these (5 a day or more) that I assume everyone's
been flooded by
On Friday 03 December 2004 06:39, Rob Blomquist might have typed:
I have been working on getting Fetchmail, Spamassassin, and maildrop to
work together to allow me to download my mail by fetchmail, pass it through
spamassassin, and then let maildrop drop it in a place where I can let
Kmail
On Thursday 02 December 2004 13:12, Ronald I. Nutter might have typed:
I have been getting bombarded by spam trying to sell me Rolex watches of
one variety or another. I have had experience writing rules as yet but
may need to start. The following is the smtp header from one of the
messages.
On Saturday 20 November 2004 04:27, Rob Blomquist wrote:
I gotta love it. And I see that you guys are the pros at this. But with
network testing, I find that it really slows down Kmail, as the filtering
is done by it, piping the messages through spamc.
Fetchmail - [spamc] - local
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 08:55, Martin might have typed:
Hi,
I'm using SA 2.6x with SURBL and alot of SARE rules. Recently alot of
stock spams are getting through.
Content analysis details: (9.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
On Friday 12 November 2004 10:11, Alan Munday might have typed:
Just saw this posted this morning:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4004125.stm
I'm suspecting the link points to the infected machine that is
distributing the malmail. Clearly to avoid SURBL catching it.
The distribution
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 13:20, Gary Manigault might have typed:
I am new and working on setting up Spamassasin 2.64 with Postfix. I
would like to know if you can point me to the right site and directions
to setup spamassassin to work with postfix. I would like to configure it
the most
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 12:33, Moussa Fall might have typed:
Question from a newbie: can anyone point me to a location where I can find
out to make spamassassin automatically reject spam? I noticed that all
tagged spam are really spams and I do not want users to receive mail with
scores,
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 13:24, Moussa Fall might have typed:
Thank you, Martin and Duncan!
Sorry I did not mention this information. I am using RH9 with Postfix.
Maybe I can use Mailscanner.
The folks on the postfix list will thwack you if you use mailscanner, as it
apparently uses
95 matches
Mail list logo
