Turning pyzor off

I experimented with pyzor and set these in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, after installing pyzor use_pyzor 1 pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor pyzor_options --homedir /etc/spamassassin I've since commented them out and discontinued the experiment. I assumed that would be the end of pyzor

Re: How does sa know when pyzor sees a spam msg?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: [...] Harry wrote: >>How is it all found by procmail? Matus UHLAR responded: > exactly as you use above. It also does not matter if you use pyzor, all > checks SA uses are evaluated that way. > > Simply install pyzor (razor, dcc, ...), activate

How does sa know when pyzor sees a spam msg?

Having a heck of a time googling for this answer. I'm looking to understand the actual mechanism whereby pyzor tells sa it thinks a message is spam. What does sa look for. My sa setup allows sa to insert X-Spam headers and then procmail looks for certain of those :0fw | /usr/bin/spamc

Re: Really getting discouraged... when does the learning happen?

Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com writes: On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system. I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450 msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam

Re: How to keep SA from Attaching the spammy messages (version control)

Thomas Harold thomas-li...@nybeta.com writes: On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca writes: From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf: report_safe 0 Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment

How to make SA include Report for all msgs

How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for all messages rather than just the spam messages? I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the Report header for spam msgs.

Re: How to make SA include Report for all msgs

Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk writes: On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote: How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for all messages rather than just the spam messages? I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes SA to includes the Report header for spam

SA Scoring... mysterious point loss

SA is letting mail thru as ham that should be spam apparently based on what is too low a score (for my mail) for URIBL_JP_SURBL which was 1.9 by default. I pushed it up to 4. But then I see a report that shows a total score of 4.9 when 4.0 is shown for URIBL_JP_SURBL 1.0 is shown for

Re: How to make SA include Report for all msgs

Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk writes: On 15.09.13 08:58, Harry Putnam wrote: How can I make SA include the 'X-Spam-Report:' header and report for all messages rather than just the spam messages? I have `report_safe 0' set but that only causes

Re: procmail/spassassin training session

Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: 1) Does it matter that I have autolearn turned off in spamassassin conf filt 'local.cf' while doing my sandbox work No, it doesn't. In fact it's probably better that way

Re: SA Scoring... mysterious point loss

RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes: On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:19:12 -0400 Harry Putnam wrote: [...] I assumed it had something to do with rounding or something so I increased the score to 4.1 to get that message to break the spam level of 5. Now the same mail shows a total of 5.1 4.1

Really getting discouraged... when does the learning happen?

I've been trying to `teach' SA to spam from ham in my mail system. I've made it thru two main learning sessions where I ran around 450 msgs (each time) thru sa-learn spam/ham and yet SA is still incapable of getting it right more than about 40 % or maybe less. Not sure how to figure that out

after sa-learn on spam I get '0' messages read?

Using spamassassin 3.3.2 on debian linux (testing) I haven't tried teaching spamassasin spam from ham by hand before but looking thru the docs I guess something like: sa-learn --spam spammail (Where spammail is mbox style file) is supposed to be teaching Sa that those messages are spam. But,

Re: after sa-learn on spam I get '0' messages read?

snowybunting snowybunting2...@gmail.com writes: Harry wrote: sa-learn --spam spammail Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined) Is this normal output or does it mean just what it appears to, that nothing was done? The file is mbox format, at least 'mutt -f spam' reads

How to keep SA from Attaching the spammy messages

I vaguely remember being able to tell SA, maybe in the local.cf file or something, not to attach messages like this: , | [-- Attachment #1 --] | [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --] | | Spam detection software, running on the system reader.local.lan, has | identified this

Re: How to keep SA from Attaching the spammy messages

Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca writes: From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf: report_safe 0 Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment.

Re: check old config against current versions

, but On 10/15, Harry Putnam wrote: trusted_networks 192.168.0. I don't think that was ever necessary, I think 192.168.0.* is included in SA's default guesses if you don't specify a trusted_networks. But I guess that's not documented, and I don't feel like checking the code for it at the moment

check old config against current versions

I found a version of local.cf from a good while back. About a year and just wanted to see if anyone sees something in it that would be incompatible or just wrong for current versions of SA. Its a bit much to ask since its still 96 lines even with all comments and blank lines removed. But still

Can bayes learning be turned on and off in one procmailrc

I've been thinking about using bayes in learning mode, but I want to do it without disturbing my current mail setup. I thought I might (using procmail) channel a copy of all incoming mail through spamassassin with bayes learning turned on. I'd want bayes learning off in the main mail setup. So

How to get a fresh start in messy old setup

Setup: Single user Linux Desktop, and home Family lan Running: Gentoo Linux (kernel-2.6.33) sendmail-8.14 procmail-3.22 spamassassin-3.3.1 Mail and News reader: emacs/gnus (emacs is version 24) ---- ---=---

ok_locales en Unexpected behavior

Running spamassassin-3.1.0 I have `ok_locales en' set in local.cf. I had hoped that would cut down on the amount of processing SA has to do, but I see messages with a subject line like this: Subject: Replicas dos melhores relogios That still grind thru lots of processing and never did hit

Re: ok_locales en Unexpected behavior

jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nothing of note short circuits any of the SpamAssassin tests. They all have to be evaluated because a positive or negative score might get over- ridden by subsequent processing. Suppose you had a whitelist entry that forgot and sent you a message in Spanish? I

Re: non-english messages

Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Harry Putnam wrote: running spamassassin-3.1.0 I hoped to filter messages on the basis of non-english subject line so went looking in the files spama uses. I see something about FOREIGN language but then it dawned on me, being horribly colloquial

Keep spama from encapsulating

Where is the info about how to keep spama from encapsulating and just have it modify headers with its own insertions. I've scanned Mail::Spamassassin::Conf But did not see that sort of stuff coverd there

bayes howto documentation

Is there a piece of documentation devoted specifically to using bayes in SA? I'm a long time SA user but have always avoided the bayes angle because it always seems too complicated to learn to use.

Retain original headers

[Possible duplicate Alert... Posted on gmane a few days ago but did not appear on my server... now posted direct to list] Running SA 3.0.2 I may be just missunderstanding something here, if so I hope someone will help me straighten out my flawed view of how this works. I pull down mail from an