For this particular case it would be better to write a DNS plugin that
would do a DNS lookup for the domain nameservers and return that in a
matchable form. Going via the registrar to get the nameservers incurs
far too much overhead.
Two examples with postfwd:
# hard version
Am 25.8.2010 22:47, schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
Jan, any chance you could provide the paragraphs or text parts
corresponding to the seeks?
Just to clarify: We do *not* require the full message, even though it
makes things simpler. In fact, no headers (other than Subject) are ever
used in
Hi,
we use spamassassin with the sought ruleset since several years at our
company. After the upgrade to from 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 we notice tons of
false-positives hitting on the rules JM_SOUGHT_1 and JM_SOUGHT_2.
Unfortunaley I can not give examples as these messages contain
confidental customer
Jason Haar schrieb:
All this talk about trying to catch urls that contain spaces/etc got me
thinking: why isn't this a standard SA feature? i.e if SA sees
www(whitespace|comma|period)-combo(therest), then rewrite it as the
url and process.
How would you distinguish between
... go to WWW
Martin Gregorie schrieb:
... go to WWW EVIL ORG for new meds ...
and
... digging through the WWW HE SAW this link ...
Both IMO should be caught and given a positive score. I've never seen
legitimate mail containing URLs written this way.
Maybe I was not clear: The last one is NOT an url.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Is SAW a valid TOPLEVEL domain?
SA could use a list of valid TLD's.
Ok, let's change that (do not forget that there's more than .com)
the www seems to become the primary source of information these days
(-www.seems.to?)
And I think we agree, that it would
Martin Gregorie schrieb:
What makes you think I'm using URI tests or that any of these would be
recognised as a URI? My tests are simple body tests with {1,n} limits on
repetitions to keep things under control.
So you want obfuscated urls to be recognised as urls but not treated as
urls?
Justin Mason schrieb:
For the upcoming release, we're considering dropping support for that
interpreter version. If you're still using 5.6.x, or know of a
(relatively recent) distro that does, please reply to highlight
this
--j.
Don't know if it's still relevant: Solaris 8
# uname
Jan P. Kessler schrieb:
Justin Mason schrieb:
For the upcoming release, we're considering dropping support for that
interpreter version. If you're still using 5.6.x, or know of a
(relatively recent) distro that does, please reply to highlight
this
--j.
Don't know
Henrik K schrieb:
sorry, just missed the relatively recent statement ;-)
When the system gets old enough that it's not supported officially and you
are forced to manually CPAN fresh modules (and possibly wreak havoc on the
OS), there is no reason not to compile your own perl (or upgrade
Elsa Andrés schrieb:
OTOH, that server cannot be dead as I can perform any host or dig
queries with it:
Just a guess: Is /etc/resolv.conf readable by the uid you run sa/amavis?
dave_c00 schrieb:
I have run the 'perl Makefile.PL' in the correct directory but the 'make
install' isn't working.
Something is going wrong!
So, you think my comment is not very helpful? Maybe your desciption of
the problem is not that helpful, too. If you don't provide more
information
Hi,
sa-update currently fails with:
http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD
HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead title403 Forbidden/title /headbody
h1Forbidden/h1 pYou don't have permission to access
/rules/stage/320725913.tar.gz on this server./p hr
addressApache/2.2.8
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
sa-update currently fails with:
http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: [...]
Any permission issues on yerp.org?
Just tested, works for me. Did you try again?
Jep, it's working now
mouss schrieb:
Micah Anderson a écrit :
Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote:
postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal
dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be
Mofo_Jones schrieb:
Just Postfix. In postfix and I believe Sendmail.
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Mofo_Jones wrote:
One more question. This site has multiple domains that it does a
MX backup for and there are a few domains that I do not want SA to
scan and add any
16 matches
Mail list logo
