Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 01/07/05 05:05 PM, Scott Wertz sat at the `puter and typed:
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:58, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Couldn't you just increase the scores to 100?
That would be tha answer. I believe how might also have been part of
that question.
I thought it was...sorry if I
jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
bypasses
SA on your system, if you can.
Loren
With procmail that's easy. With other tools I cannot say.
Exactly. I have been unable to find a way to do this on a system
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jdow wrote:
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are better off rearranging things so that this newsgroup simply
bypasses
SA on your system, if you can.
Loren
With procmail that's easy. With other tools I cannot say.
Exactly. I have been unable to find a way
Rakesh wrote:
Hii
Can any body tell me when does Bayes00 gives the score. Is it
1) If a mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has never seen before.
or
2) If the mail has a lot of tokens that Bayes has previously learnt has
spam.
The reason of my weird question is that recently I have suddenly
Matt Linzbach wrote:
Can someone point me to a thread that would discuss the scoring of the Bayesian
rules in 3.0. Specifically why BAYES_99 would score less than BAYES_95 for
bayes+net tests?
TIA
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/61212/match=
just for 1 :)
You
Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 15:34 +0100, Thomas Arend wrote:
score BAYES_99 0 0 4.070 4.070 # or as high as you suggest.
uh! What man page should I read to understand that syntax ?
What are the 4 numbers following BAYES_99 ?
I thought It would just be followed by
Andy Hester wrote:
Hello all,
Im setting up a new spam gateway with amvisd-new and
spamassassin. Where do I need to put custom rules/scoring in order to
be used correctly. I would like to use for example rules from sare and
weight it so that some things such as the adult rules
Gary W. Smith wrote:
The article mentions that they reached out to the SA community to
request submission. Which community did they read out to?
I would have been glad to throw an environment together just for their
testing purposes.
I also wonder how many vendors on that list use SA as a
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William Holman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:08 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Unsubscribe?
I've been over-ruled by those who pay the bills, so I can't use
SpamAssassin since it's open source
There was a discussion a little while back (couple weeks at most) where
a lot of people were having problems with SA not working properly and
the culprit was invalid options in local.cf. Particularly auto_learn
instead of bayes_auto_learn. I forget who, but someone asked if there
was a
Rich wrote:
I have recently upgrades from 2.x to 3.0.1 and have been watching the
scores for stuff that is real spam. I had a bunch of up-weighted scores in
2.x but I didn't move those over to the new version while I evaluated what
the new version was doing. What I don't understand are what seem
Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Barnes writes:
All,
Does anyone have an opinion of the mail below? To me it looks like
deceptive marketing practice where the people at equifaxmktg.com are
trying to validate emails or something. The scary thing is that
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William Stearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 3:53 PM
To: ML-spamassassin-talk; ml-surbl-discuss
Cc: William Stearns
Subject: MIT Spam conference
Good day, all,
I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year,
Stuart Johnston wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
auto_learn has NEVER been valid. It's bayes_auto_learn. It also should
only contain a 1 or a 0 after it. No $
I've seen a lot of people with auto_learn in their configs. Where'd
you get that? did you use some config auto generator?
Andrew Xiang wrote:
I want to run spamassassin on my existing /var/mail/mymailbox and only move
all the spam mail into /var/mail/spam .
Is there a way to do that?
thanks
Andrew
you could run spamassassin -e on the message and then make a quick
script to check the return status and move the
William Stearns wrote:
Good day, Andrew,
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Andrew Xiang wrote:
But I have a whole mbox with 10,000 messages. How can I pipe all the
messages and move them?
- Original Message -
From: Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Xiang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Xiang wrote:
I
Steve Bondy wrote:
I'm trying to build a new box with SA 3.0.1, but a perl missing perl
module won't install.
HTML::Parser keeps throwing:
undefined symbol: sv_catpvn_utf8_upgrade
So obviously, there's something about UTF-8 encoding/decoding I'm
missing, but Google searches, the SA Wiki, and other
Andy Firman wrote:
I just started using Spamassasin 3.0 and am very
impressed with it. Recently, on an old server that I
just started to manage, I just found a spam
infested mbox spool file with 15,000 spams in it. (52MB)
Nobody had checked the mailbox in about 10 months.
Is it a good idea to
Lisa Casey wrote:
Hi All,
I'm still fairly new to Spamassassin. I have a question regarding Bayes
learning in Spamassassin. I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.1 on Redhat Linux. I
have one mailbox on this server that receives nothing but spam and quite a
lot of it. I decided that would be a good
Lisa Casey wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lisa Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Bayes learning
Make sure the user you are running the script as is the same user that
spamassassin runs
Jerry Bell wrote:
This spam went through with a score of 0. I'm using 3.01 with most of the
sare rulesets. Any ideas on how to catch these?
Thanks,
Jerry
http://www.syslog.org
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004
Jerry Bell wrote:
I'm using SA through exim/exiscan, and I've got it set up to only report
if it is spam. Guess I should change that.
The SA logs showing it getting a score of 0. SA is working really well
for me the other 99% of the time.
Jerry
Jerry Bell wrote:
This spam went through with a
Chris wrote:
I was messing around with fetchmail yesterday seeing if I could get it to
work for the first time. After playing with it for a few hours and seeing
that it was working I happened to notice one of my crontab messages was in
the right folder, but marked as spam. Looking at the
Jerry Bell wrote:
I wonder if my bayes db has been poisoned to the point of thinking this is
ham? In the logs, it autolearned this one as ham, so I suspect that may
be the case.
You say it scored 0 points..does this mean it triggered no rules or the
+ - rules totaled up to 0? Regardless of
Jerry Bell wrote:
When I run it manually, this is what I get:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on db.stelesys.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.1
X-Spam-Level:
What's this best way to get it out of the AWL and
Ronan wrote:
hi all.
for those of you running large volume servers you no doubt have an
abundance of spam to feed into sa-learn, and i suppose that goes for all
sizes of volumes.
but one question. how do you manage to match the same number with hams /
real messages. how do you go about bumping
Ronan wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Ronan wrote:
hi all.
for those of you running large volume servers you no doubt have an
abundance of spam to feed into sa-learn, and i suppose that goes for
all sizes of volumes.
but one question. how do you manage to match the same number with
hams / real messages
Ronan wrote:
so it doesnt make a difference if you have inordinately larger amounts
of one than the other?? I would have thought it would've worked better
with more ham...
i read somewhere on the list thats its best to balance.
you'll get conflicting answers to this question. The only real
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:02 PM
To: SpamAssassin Users
Subject: Re: SURBL and DNS wildcards
On Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 11:32:41 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
That is correct, only the reg
brian wrote:
After upgrading to 3.0.1 I've been having problems with bayes. This may
be a question for the mimedefang guys, but I'll start here.
I have upgraded the databases, and its now reading correctly, as I get
bayes scoring now. However autoupdates are failing because of lock
files...
Ronan wrote:
what format does sa-learn expect mail to be in.
I tried to feed it a 2meg standard unix email file of my spam folder and
it only registered it as one email but with 4000 tokens...
Anyone... there is nothing in hte man [page about it
ronan
You probably want:
--mbox
SNIP The on topic stuff
OT text continues..
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Confidentiality Notice
Damn spammers. (Those who dictate the insertion of these things are no
better than spammers IMO. Not that this is your fault, but most likely
some
political dimwit on the board of ed in MN.)
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:17 AM 11/4/2004, Sean Doherty wrote:
JMHO, but shouldn't all networks be considered untrusted unless a user
specifies otherwise?
I got to agree with you there - especially given that the inference
algorithm doesn't work in every environment.
Unfortunately this only
Sean Doherty wrote:
Justin,
- if any addresses of the 'by' host is in a reserved network range,
then it's trusted
However, I would have thought that this would imply that the 10.0.0.53
host is trusted and not any servers connecting to it.
The problem is that 10.x is a private net, therefore
marti wrote:
I'm running SA 3.0.0 and have put the following in user_prefs
local.cf(restarted spamd):-
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag **SPAM**
But still not getting the subject tagged, what am I missing? All was fine
with the previous version.
Your missing the part where you read the CHANGES file
From: Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.00
in your local.cf file
Thanks - exactly what I needed :)
/me kicks himself
I really *should* have seen that
Note that you'll want
Chris Santerre wrote:
SNIP On Topic text
Is this not at the mercy of how users put your email into their address
book? What if my wife adds me to her address book under Sexy stud muffin?
Well then she'd probably be lying ;)
-Jim
Jeremy wrote:
I was checking the logs on our qmail (4.9) box running SA (2.60) and
in the logs I am getting a large number of messages with score (?/?)
Oct 14 10:47:56smtpgate1 qmail-scanner[83917]:
Clear:RC:0(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx):SA:0(?/?):
Oct 14 10:50:03
J Thomas Hancock wrote:
I apologize for the questions, but this is how my Boss wants things done
and who am I to argue with him. I figure he will listen to me better if
I have a creditable source, the SpamAssassin mailing list, backing me up
versus me by myself.
Part 1:
My boss is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, appeared to work great, logging to maillog and all, the problem
now becomes where it's putting spam.
previously my procmailrc looked like this:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$HOME/spam
which routed spam to the users spam folder
when i
Carnegie, Martin wrote:
Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick
:-)
--Chris
So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must
be missing something.
Martin Carnegie
The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature,
not a
Bob Branch wrote:
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 10:06, Maurice Lucas wrote:
A second SA instance with a score of 0.1 and a subject line of
***non-spam***
is there no other way? no way to specify a condition and assign the
appropriate subject_tag? (not that I've seen much in the docs I've been
reading
Eduardo Bejar wrote:
Hi,
What does this message means? On maillog:
Oct 1 10:13:24 mail mailscanner[22924]: Either you've found a bug in
MailScanner's F-Prot output parser, or F-Prot's output format has changed!
F-Prot said this /var/spool/MailScanner/incoming/i91FD3623161/Joke.cpl
W32/[EMAIL
Scott Johnson wrote:
After upgrading to SA 3.0, I noticed a lot of spam with subject lines
including SEXUALLY- EXPLICIT started to get through, even though there
were existing rules that were meant specifically to catch them. I first
boosted the score of the rules that catch these messages from
Chris Santerre wrote:
LOL, nah. I feel bad for people who don't like hockey. They have never
played. Never felt the pure unbridled aggression and fury of the game. Never
had a person pull back to take a slapshot right in front of then and had to
decide in a split second if you are man enough to
Quoting scohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I run spamassassin -D --lint I am noticing this message:
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 0
Argument isn't numeric in addition (+) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 572.
Spamassasin
Quoting Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just updated Bigevil, which now is 1.25 megs in size. It will consume the
souls of your server, your family, and that cute girl/guy at your local
coffee shop!
With the release of SA 3.0, for the love of all that is digital, use SURBL!!
Tell your ISP's to
Quoting James [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I checked the doc's archive however, I can not find a solution to my
problem. What I am trying to do is have different users in Mysql bayes
db. I am using Spamd with the following start options:
-d -c -m6 -H -i0.0.0.0 -A192.168.0 -D -x -s /var/log/spamd.log
When I
Quoting Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Greetings Spamfighters.
This is the only time I'll mention this. I , yes I, requested a paypal
donate button for SARE. I put it up on the homepage of SARE. I wanted this
just because our host has been very good to us, and put up with quite a lot
of traffic
Quoting Raquel Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:15:21 -0400
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can choose to implement it in
procmail locally, it's quite easy.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/40735/match=subject+prefix+new+list
The fundamental
Quoting Satya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IDSPISPOPD (that's no clipping in Doom)
oh the good ole days...
(and remember, there's a side-post down there)
On Sep 14, 2004 at 16:16, Chris Santerre wrote:
I figured is you were gonna start another group flame war, we should do it
correctly.
You forgot 1) SA
Quoting Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I lost my freakin mind last night. I was about to drive to someone's house
and stick the phone someplace they didn't want it ;) Rather then just rant
about it, I figured I would take my anger and put it towards something
constructive.
So for anyone who
Quoting Michael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see! said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw...
I forgot the word Subject in that line.
Not only that, but the line above it
rewrite_subject 1
should be removed as it does nothing anymore.
-Jim
Quoting Jeff Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I certainly agree with a simple [SA} prefix so that the SA emails don't get
lost and deleted with all the other stuff I get. However, this came up a
few months ago and the SA list nazis decided that we must be too stupid not
to have programmed our email clients
Quoting Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Michele Neylon::Blacknight Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why is List-Id not sufficient?
It's only visible if you examine the header. Something in the subject
line is a lot more visual
Pssst: Subject: is also a header.
Yes, but its one that every mailer
201 - 255 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
