RelayCountry plugin does the work for you. You configure it to score certain
relay countries (looked up by ip extracted from headers, not DNS domain of the
sender) and it just does so. I've used it for few years and it works very well.
(Since I don't expect any traffic at all from i.e.
On Wednesday 02 of March 2011, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
From a legal perspective I will point out that any e-mail you
receive is (at least in the US, but most other countries too)
considered copyrighted by the sender. Under copyright law the
sender has the right to control
On Wednesday 02 of March 2011, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Furthermore, many copyright laws have permitted use
(sorry, don't know the right english term for it) instead of fair use
which explicitly says what can be done with a work after its first
publishing. And this use cannot be limited by
On Wednesday 02 of March 2011, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Furthermore, many copyright laws have permitted use
(sorry, don't know the right english term for it) instead of fair use
which explicitly says what can be done with a work after its first
publishing. And this use cannot be limited by
On Thursday, 22 of April 2010, Jared Hall wrote:
It takes two to tango.
But takes just one to spoil the fun. Trust me, I do ballroom dancing :-)
1) If your recipient's Email server didn't use UCEPROTECT, you would not
In terms of extortion, I don't see any liability whatever.
Level 1
On Friday, 23 of April 2010, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This is now what ISPs should do - enforce no-spam policies, apparently
including blocking outgoing SMTP for non-MTAs. We (at my employer) are
doing this now, even because of UCEPROTECT but also because of different
reasons.
Of
On Friday, 23 of April 2010, n.frank...@gmail.com wrote:
But I wouldn't count on that, and I think that if you have spammed,
they'd have proof against you...
Well... There is no way to contact them if you're listed. Even if it's not
level1. Not to mention that they never provide any proof
On Friday, 23 of April 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Not to mention that they never provide any proof of any
abuse which is supposed to have caused the listing.
Surely that is not unusual - do any of the many list providers provide
such proof??
Honestly - I have no idea since I had not been
On Wednesday, 21 of April 2010, Osax wrote:
How to I disable spam checking for a domain.
Using spamassassin with mysql.
I have a server with multiple virtual domain,
I want to disable spam checking on some of them.
Is this possible?
I think you should filter domains at MTA level. That
On Wednesday, 7 of April 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
Here's another good list that rates quality.
http://www.intra2net.com/en/support/antispam/index.php
The methodology behind this rating is kinda peculiar.
What good is counting messages hit by lists? If I make a DNSBL which just
marks gmail as
On Friday, 2 of April 2010, Mathias Homann wrote:
how would i make a rule that scores for mails that contain an url
under the TLD .xx but haven't gone through at least one relay in the
same country?
how would I make a rule that scores for mails that contain an URL that
is _hosted_ in
On Wednesday, 31 of March 2010, David wrote:
I've just found that line on the spamc man page:
-K Perform a keep-alive check of spamd, instead of a full message check.
Someone knows what it means, and what it actually does?
It does what it says. Keep-alive means check means just connecting
On Wednesday, 24 of February 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Well, I guess it depends on your point of view - how difficult is it
to set up an MTA to reject mails pretending to be from yourdomain
that didn't originate on your MTA?
Good question - how would you do it?
Postfix: I would have two
On Wednesday, 24 of February 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
I guess you could start hashing things around
with IPTables to redirect certain requests, but once you've done all
of this, changed all the clients etc. etc, you are saying this would
be *easier* than SPF?
See Mariusz Kruks suggestion -
On Wednesday, 24 of February 2010, Christian Brel wrote:
IP yes. I assume your external and internal network are on different
IP-ranges.
What about my home workers? I don't have a VPN, they hook in by DSL
from any number of different providers from outside using SASL/TLS.
They should be
On Wednesday, 24 of February 2010, Christian Brel wrote:
No, they submit on 25 using TLS+SASL. Would making
the changes to Firewall, MTA, plus potentially thosands of clients be
easier than SPF? Would all those angry users screaming because they
can't send mail at all be a good thing? I don't
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 19:47 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
In a previous post, i have request a information, can i use one
central bayes database
for a lot of SpamAssassin Server.
I have received a answer: Yes
But what is the process ?
I use a common bayes database for all users
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 21:55 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
How can I write a rule on the primary server that will automatically
consider the message as spam is the other server detected it as spam.
I tried:
header PREVIOUS_SPAM X-Spam-Flag =~ /YES/,
header PREVIOUS_SPAM X-Spam-Status ~=
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 23:58 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
2010/1/14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
well, you either trust SA on secondary MX - then don't run the mail through
SA again.
But not all mails go through the 2nd MX ; so this is exactly what I
want to do: don't run
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:24 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
that's just what I said - don't run mail through SA _again_.
Uh Duh!
Do you think I'll be asking here if I knew how to do it?
Your initial question was not how to not run articular messages thru
SA, but How to score on existing
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:41 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Your initial question was not how to not run articular messages thru
SA, but How to score on existing spam headers. That's a different
issue.
I wanted to mark as spam, mais already tagged spam . At the end of the
day, I achieve
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:06 -0300, Walter Breno wrote:
I'm using postfix with mailscanner to integrate spamassassin and
clamav, but when spamassassin score a message as spam the subject of
the message is chagnged to {Spam?} subject and i want to send every
message that spamassasin mark
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 09:12 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how
it works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham,
and I wondered if I was doing something wrong.
Yes, UCEPROTECT seems to be just a big scam.
A
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:31 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Every respectable RBL has _clear_ rules of
1. Listing
Hmm, I'm not so sure - how about spamcop, surbl, uribl, spamhaus? Their
rules are exactly as clear or unclear as those of uceprotect.
First of all, you have (for example on spamcop):
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 23:20 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm interested in people's opinion of UCEPROTECT. I'm aware of how it
works, but even UCEPROTECT1 seems to catch an awful lot of ham, and I
wondered if I was doing something wrong.
Yes, UCEPROTECT seems to be just a big scam.
A
. Otherwise noone in their sane minds would use this (at least
not any levels higher than 1).
--
Mariusz Kruk
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work :) I
have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it never appears to
hit :(
The plugin itself only adds metadata to the message. You need to
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:29 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
- Mariusz Kruk k...@epsilon.eu.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work
:) I have installed the Perl module and enabled
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:49 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
You say that you installed the Perl module - you mean the
RelayCountry
plugin or the IP::Country::Fast module? (needed by the RC module)
IP::Country::Fast as defined in the requirements.
Does `spamassassin --lint --debug' say
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:54 +0100, RW wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA
issue and this list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than
SA!
[...]
And if you think email is
On czw, 2008-09-11 at 07:53 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Folks, I'm trying to capture/grep specific given info from the subject
output, like this:
#spamassassin -D --lint | grep database
I KNOW that doesn't work, but describes my issue at hand. I've spent an
hour+ searching for others with
On czw, 2008-09-11 at 15:06 +0200, John Wilcock wrote:
No need for that attitude, we were all newbies once...
Sorry, wasn't meant as an insult or anything like that. Was more like
surprised because I really didn't understand the problem.
It wouldn't have taken any longer to give the actual
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:53:13PM -, Marcin Praczko wrote:
It is possible add some text to Subject: For example [SPLIST] - to make
easier set up filter for emails?
What for? This list already gives quite a few headers that should be
enough for filtering.
--
d'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'Yb
Daniel Aquino napisał(a):
Does anyone know actually know where the:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
module is actually ran ?
I dont see anything in /usr/share/spamassassin/* that is doing it...
I don't know about you, but I have:
epsilon:/etc/spamassassin grep RelayCountry *
I'm having problems with SA provided by debian, version 3.1.7-1.
I run spamc from /etc/procmail. spamd is run with `-x --max-children 5'.
Anyway, the problem is, messages are classified as EMPTY_MESSAGE, which
has description of `Message appears to have no textual parts and no
Subject: text',
35 matches
Mail list logo
