system and are automatically creating gmail accounts
with a success rate of 1 in 5.
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2008/02_26.xml
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/information-technology/blog
to
do it.
I'll try it this way. I'd like to be able to log the connection
attempts to see what's going on. It sounds like you run a number of
servers. What are you doing to combine your logging information?
Thanks for the advice!
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/information
the
easiest way to give out a 421 on a bogus MX and log the attempt?
Build a separate server? Use an existing server and run a service on
another port? I've got extra IP's but don't want to over complicate the
process.
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/information-technology/blog/
BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/information-technology/blog/
John Thompson wrote:
No. I use Thunderbird and just set the Junk filter controls to expire
junk messages after a couple weeks.
Interesting idea! Thanks for the tips! You have no idea how much time
and how many steps this is going to save me.
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com
.
Because the emails are kept on the IMAP server and are not local, I had
to enable the Select this folder for offline use on the Offline tab
of the folder properties. I then had the mbox file that I could copy off.
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/information-technology/blog/
from the command line, I have to run a reconstruct on the mailbox
or the folder throws errors on the client. This is on a Cyrus IMAP server.
Thanks!
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/information-technology/blog/
Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem whereby spamassassin isn't always processing
messages. It is being called by SimScan.
I can see from the headers that SimScan IS being called but it doesn't
ALWAYS seem to be able to process the messages with SpamAssassin -
resulting in 300+ SPAM
Chris Santerre wrote:
Just curious, but how many people see spam being sent to usersnames
with the fisrt letter dropped? I see a ton in my logs. I believe
spammers figure [EMAIL PROTECTED] will also have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too bad
for them...they do not. :)
I am noticing alot of this.
