Out of memory during ridiculously large request at

--force-expire /dev/null 21 and the bayes database looks not to big for me any idea what can cause this Error ? Matthias -- IT Service Häker Matthias Häker Hein Hoyer Straße 64 20359 Hamburg Tel: +49 (0)40 98238807 Tel: +49 (0)40 35077502 Fax: +49 (0)40 52596583 Mob: +49 (0)176 65571482

Re: Out of memory during ridiculously large request at

Luis Hernán Otegui schrieb: Matthias: 2008/8/22 Matthias Häker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi i found Wed Aug 20 19:10:54 2008 [81756] warn: rules: failed to run BAYES_99 test, skipping: Wed Aug 20 19:10:54 2008 [81756] warn: (Out of memory during ridiculously large request at /usr/local/lib

Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo

John D. Hardin schrieb: On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Obantec Support wrote: DROPPRIVS=yes :0fw * 512000 | /usr/bin/spamc :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes $HOME/mail/spam SPAM='spam' :0fw: $SPAM$LOGNAME.lock this will scan only one message for one user at a time. Matthias

Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers

Duane Hill schrieb: On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 at 08:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Jason Bertoch wrote: On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:07 PM Marc Perkel wrote: The details are a little to complex for this forum ... OK - had quite a few trolls here who seem to be hostile to my

Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers

Per Jessen schrieb: Marc Perkel wrote: I've developed an extremely accurate of detecting virus infected spam zombies. I think it's 100% accurate can catches them on the first try. Here is 600,000 IP addresses I've detected in the last 3 days. If you're keen to share your

Re: How to defeat the spam bot armies

Marc Perkel schrieb: I've written a best practices guide and suggestions on how to defeat the spam bot armies. If anyone wants to comment I'm looking for feedback and new ideas. http://wiki.junkemailfilter.com/index.php/How_to_put_an_end_to_Virus_Infected_Spam_Bots do you have a own

Re: Spam PDF

Robert Schetterer schrieb: Perhaps it would be easier to use clamav to filter such mails out, i think i will asked there - -- Sanesecurity has a CLAMAV signature Email.Stk.Gen522.Sanesecurity.07062102.pdf MH

Re: SaneSecurity

Craig Carriere schrieb: Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful in the Spam Wars? Thanks very effective M. Häker

Re: Solution to Bayes poisoning, high load levels, image spam, and botnet spam

Marc Perkel schrieb: I'm seeing a lot of people saying that bayes isn't working like it used to, that load levels are high, and that they are getting a lot of image and botnet spam. There are a few simple tricks you can do to get rid of 90% of it. ah nice can you tell me how to implant

Re: How To Kill Spam Dead?

Dennis Kavadas schrieb: if i had never meet you before and if i asked you to knock on my door before barging in, would you believe that was to much to ask of you ? think about it if 1.000.000 People claim to be me , and you ask always me if i was it how do you think i react Matthias

Re: Catching and stopping 419 spam

scoreFREEMAIL_REPLYTO 2 Matthias Häker

Re: Catching and stopping 419 spam

Matthias Häker schrieb: Hi i would like to give the Plugin a try but i have folowing error in spamd.log rules: failed to run FREEMAIL_REPLYTO test, skipping: Tue May 22 10:05:39 2007 [18602] warn: (Can't locate object method check_freemail_replyto via package Mail::SpamAssassin

Re: Marking HAM as good mail

Mário Gamito schrieb: Hi, My boss is getting HAM mails from two addresses which are always marked as SPAM. I've seen that lowering the sa-learn threshold is not an option. Is there a way to configure SA to stop marking those two specific addresses as SPAM ? Any help would be appreciated.

Re: spamhaus / whitelist

Hi if you use sendmail you can add From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]OK to your access file in /etc/mail dont forget to /usr/sbin/makemap hash /etc/mail/access /etc/mail/access Matthias Bill Landry schrieb: Jean-Paul Natola wrote the following on 3/27/2007 7:36 AM -0800: Hi everyone, I

Re: SpamAssassin dns timeouts... why?!

Richard D Alloway schrieb: Hi! I have been having loads of problems with spamassassin timing out during DNS lookups... If I use /usr/bin/spamassassin -D /tmp/spamemail.txt I see the correct IP used for the nameserver: [16018] dbg: dns: name server: 192.168.1.1, family: 2, ipv6: 0

Re: Moving to folder based upon spamassassin score

John W Mickevich schrieb: Hi all, I have what is probably a simple question. I know I have seen instructions on this before, but cannot locate them and was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. I am using spamassassin with sendmail and am using .procmailrc to direct my

Re: Moving to folder based upon spamassassin score

for the record now tested !! i kicked out te and the coouting is working sorry to have you spamed :) VERBOSE=ON # setting the level #trash TLVL=-20 #quarantine QLVL=-4 #maybe spam MLVL=-2 SL=0 # counting stars :0 * H ?? ()^X-Spam-Level: \/[*]+ { SPAMLEVEL=$MATCH } :0 * 1^1