bayes-db lives, nothing else
No worries, you've been a big help! ... You and Jared Hall!
Richard
rite
into? ... Again, pointers would be nice - it's not like I was planning to
spend my day doing this; I have a customer visit planned that's coming up
soon! I just don't have much time!
Richard
ook shows there are three for Spam Assassin on my system:
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
/etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter
/etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter-postfix
Before I make changes and possibly screw things up; any advice?
Thanks!
Richard
would need to
be changed, one would think, and somewhere the code told to run as
sa-milt, which I presume isn't THAT hard to find, though I've never dealt
with it before.
THANKS for pointing this out!
Richard
amass-milter:/sbin/nologin
So... run it as sa-milt (my guess), or as root?
Note that this is on a Fedora Server v 38 - the OS is a couple of months
old.
Thanks again,
Richard
format, I think -
somehow I guess I overlooked the -mbox switch!
Thanks,
Richard
Am 07.07.23 um 17:04 schrieb Richard:
I've FINALLY built up a "corpus" of ham vs spam and also FINALLY had some
time to spend on this and just ran sa-learn on, oh, IDK, some 10k email
messages or so, I'd guess. And along the way, I NEVER ONCE got the kind of
output r
at I expected.
For example, here I run it against a file containing just over 2100 spam:
$ sa-learn -u richard --spam spam
Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
(I was running it as root - which the docs don't mention but I figure is
what I'm supposed to do!)
In t
ass-mail is legit and a lot of false-positives is caused by
> morons marking mails they subscribed for as junk because they are to
> dumb to unsubscribe
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, but I’m not
sure about the universe.
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
l_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#SCORING-OPTIONS
Thnx Tom, I'll have a look at it :-)
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:17:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.06.23 um 10:46 schrieb Richard Lucassen:
> > Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
>
> what makes you think that PYZOR_CHECK is more special than any other
> rule?
>
> score PYZOR_CH
Hello list,
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
R.
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
g again because it'll
be automagically moved for folks! Win!
Thanks much,
Richard
nnecessary materials," but I'll make an exception this time!
On 2023-02-28 at 22:46:54 UTC-0500 (Tue, 28 Feb 2023 19:46:54 -0800
(PST))
Richard Troy
is rumored to have said:
Hi All,
I've been subscribed for ... close to 15 years, I think? Heck, 20 is
maybe possible! ... Just
chanism if necessary), but I just don't have the time! Private replies
welcome!
Regards ... and thanks to the list for all the great and useful materials
- just wish I could absorb it all! (I'm now trying to relearn years worth
of stuff I've forgotten because I don't use it often enough! I only run
this one site's systems as an SA!)
Richard
--
Richard Troy
es his lack of experience but also because I
really have other things to do and don't really want to be writing to this
list. ... This might be my last post here, IDK - it's certainly been
painful of the time I have available.
IF this project goes forward without said perpetual backwards
compatibility option, I will dump this project ASAP. And now, not later.
Regards,
Richard
--
Chief Scientist somewhere or other you can easily discover.
First result on Google:
http://cweiske.de/tagebuch/uribl_blocked.htm
Short version: URIBL will block you if you use any of the big DNS
providers, such as 8.8.8.8.
On 4/30/20 11:59 AM, Tom Williams wrote:
> Hi! I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've
> used it on and off
I am using a rule to detect email with very long links included as I
have seen that those are mostly spam. Some of the messages will include
many copies of the link.
Is there a way to write a meta rule that detects multiple instances of
the same rule?
Hi everyone,
I want to try and detect malicious uri in the body of emails better and thought
there might be something I could use, since I imagine google have a good list
of them. I found this link, but it fails to install.
http://search.cpan.org/~danborn/Bundle-SafeBrowsing/lib/Bundle/SafeBrow
>-Original Message-
>From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
>Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 14:30
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Image spam - FuzzyOCR?
>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 + Richard Mealing wrote:
>>>
Hi everyone,
I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple of
questions;
1) Is this being used? Does it detect image spam, or should I be looking
at something else?
2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just images and
text inside an image
-Original Message-
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 25 April 2016 13:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: KAM error?
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:43:07 +
Richard Mealing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm seeing this a bit on google, but I'
Hi everyone,
I'm seeing this a bit on google, but I'm not quite sure of the fix.
Apr 25 12:41:21.264 [49367] warn: rules: failed to run __KAM_SPF_NONE test,
skipping:
Apr 25 12:41:21.264 [49367] warn: (Can't locate object method
"check_for_spf_none" via package "Mail: [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMs
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: 12 April 2016 16:15
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?
Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote:
>
>> I have c
Hi everyone,
I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug.
I have 2 servers and when an email filters through 1 of them, I get this back -
(not cached, score=5.403,required 4,
BAYES_50 0.80,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 1.40,
HTML_MESSAGE 0.30,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 0.38,
LOCAL_M
On 01/04/2016 05:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.01.2016 um 13:53 schrieb a.sm...@ldexgroup.co.uk:
>> On Jan 4, 2016, 3:42 AM, rwmaillists at googlemail wrote:
>>>
>>> No look-up is done. RDNS_NONE tests whether rdns is recorded in the
>>> received header. You need either to turn it on or t
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: 03 November 2015 17:18
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: New rules..
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Richard Mealing wrote:
> So I'm looking for something that would block this -
>
> fastnet.
From: Joe Quinn [mailto:jqu...@pccc.com]
Sent: 02 November 2015 17:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: New rules..
On 11/2/2015 12:00 PM, Richard Mealing wrote:
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I'm new here..
Thanks,
Rich
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I'm new here..
Thanks,
Rich
On 10/29/2015 01:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 11:09, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been receiving tons of messages not being tagged by spamassassin
>> on one host, despite it hitting bayes999, and wanted to see if there
>> was something that could be done.
>>
>> http://pastebin.co
cuda to not block my mail?
>
> Thanks,
> --Jered
>
The BRBL may have listed the entire /24 that includes your sending IPs.
Painful experience has shown that Barracuda won't hear your requests for
delisting, and the listing may never go away.
Barracuda have run their emailreg.org scam for many years.
-Richard
problem:
1st time: 6 years ago (1 From: address)
2nd time: 2 months ago (1 From: address)
3rd time: last week (1 From: address)
:-)
R.
--
___
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.
+--+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht|
+--+
emove all doubt.
+------+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht|
+--+
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Marieke Janssen wrote:
On 2015-04-16 19:08, Richard Troy wrote:
postfix/smtpd[18151]: warning: connect to Milter service
unix:/run/spamass-milter/postfix/sock: No such file or directory
Postfix probably tries to read
/var/spool/postfix/run/spamass-milter/postfix
cket::IP [::1]:783 (running version 3.4.0)
...This gives the STRONG suggestion I should be putting that socket number
into postfix's smtpd_milters parameter...
OK, that's where I'm at; help humbly requested.
Regards,
Richard
On 03/27/2015 03:44 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Richard Doyle
> wrote:
>
>> All of these were "From:" domains created today.
> Shouldn't they have been picked up by DOB? Or do I need to manually enable
> some DOB plugin in SA? (If so
On 03/27/2015 11:51 AM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Axb wrote:
>
>> - Please post missed spam samples in pastebin.com - do not post samples to
>> mailing lists
> Of course, I would never post it to the list. I will put up a few in
> pastebin but there are so many of them,
It is a new domain, created September 30 with namecheap. An effective
"new domain" system would catch lots of similar spam.
Oh, and I'm another satisfied invaluement customer.
On 09/30/2014 10:41 AM, David Jones wrote:
>>
>> From: Philip Prindeville
>> S
On 06/25/2014 02:12 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axb wrote:
>
>> On 06/25/2014 10:21 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/qLyKx40b
>> "This paste has been removed!" :(
> I’ve temporarily posted it on ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/harp.eml
I
On 06/09/2014 02:42 PM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Richard Doyle
> mailto:lists...@islandnetworks.com>> wrote:
>
>
> A caching whois client (jwhois, for example) can significantly reduce
> the volume of queries.
>
>
>
On 06/09/2014 12:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/9/2014 3:24 PM, Patrick Domack wrote:
>> The point was, I have already done this, and have it in production. I
>> did this cause this subject keeps coming up from time to time, and I
>> was personally interested to see the results of it.
>>
>>
xactly the same output. Is this correct? I have repeated this
several times with different messages. The sa-learn execution displays a
message like
Learned tokens from 2 message(s) (2 message(s) examined)
Richard Crane
---
Haskins Laboratories / (203) 865-6163 X 275 / FAX (203) 865-
Hypotheticians might want to look at jwhois, which is a caching whois
client. Cache expiration time is configurable ...
On 05/08/2013 06:45 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> RE: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam
>
> Hypothetically if one were running a reputation system and didn't want
> to block all of
SURBL has reorganized its lists and provided a new spamassassin
configuration to support those changes:
http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2013-May/000209.html
I'm using sa-update (version 3.003001) and noticed that 25_uribl.cf
already contains the new configuration, but with all lines comm
On 10/01/2012 09:53 AM, JP Kelly wrote:
> I am getting a bunch of particularly annoying spam which always has a short
> html body message similar to:
>
> HELLO dude
>
> Any ideas how to combat this spam?
Lower your threshold to 5.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssass
On 6/28/2012 8:43 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 6/28/12 9:08 PM, Richard B. Pyne wrote:
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 running as spamd called from maiad called
>> form postfix on CentOS 6.2 64bit linux.
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get a new installation of SpamAs
t;Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 69) line 366.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
--Richard
On 03/29/2012 05:10 PM, Frank Chan wrote:
On 02-03-2012 15:49, Frank Chan wrote:
Here are some samples of this spam in pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/djidF7dg
http://pastebin.com/DQan00ve
http://pastebin.com/1PizAzMv
http://pastebin.com/Hd6vVpYi
Thank you,
Frank
On 02-03-2012 14:31, Jeremy McS
On 03/23/2012 11:23 AM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it manually via sa-learn
it yell a lot more rules being detected.
could it be that there
e url_2 10
score url_3 10
score url_4 10
But I want just one line to define the score. Are there more ways to do
this ?
Greetings .. Richard
imilarly, uribl-black objects to backup.sh
I'm not surprised that a message like this hits a number of rules.
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Richard Doyle
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:46 -0400, Glendon Solsberry wrote:
> >> I have messages that are being flagg
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:46 -0400, Glendon Solsberry wrote:
> I have messages that are being flagged via URI_HEX, without having
> *any* 'http' in them. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Snippage contains http://141641
, but
are there some secret tricks i should know about ?
Greetings, Richard ...
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 22:52 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the preferred list of URL block lists that everyone uses? I'm
> currently using SURBL and a few others, often times there are URLs
> like 'learningbetter.net' that isn't tagged.
http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ivmuri/
Very ta
t; once an
> hour like that.
Noted. I just needed a quick fix to get rid of them and the manual
rules worked like a charm.
Richard
ved to be futile :(
Richard
2008/12/2 Yet Another Ninja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> these should be caught by your AV - submit samples to your vendor if its
> still not being detected.
While I agree in general, the text is very static and antivirus eats CPU,
SA does not (so much).
Richard
ate my own?
Thanks,
Richard
ly, certainly there was a spike on 14/11/2008
(Friday). I wonder what caused that?
I'd certainly be interested if other people saw something similar. On a
similar note, does anybody remember what happened on 16/02/2008? The
amount of spam coming through our systems seemed to have jumped by 530%!
Regards
Richard
Claudia Burman wrote:
...if the URI is not listed in www.uribl.com ?
Another message from the same domain doesn't hit the rule
uribl.com checks embedded URIs in the message, not the from domain. The
content of the two messages was obviously different. One contained a
listed URI, the other
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:43 -0400, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> I used to get about 19-15 spam messages in my box per week, now , eve today I
> got 11-
>
> and they are hardly hitting any rules, anything new (rbl's etc..) I should
> look into?
jm_sought rules are useful
http://wiki.apache.org/spam
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:20 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with this particular
> whitelist:
>
> http://www.emailreg.org/
Their confirmation message scored on DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS, WHOIS_PRIVPROT
and MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY, adding 6.9 points to the score!
Greetings,
We've been getting quite a bit of spam with the following header:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: David Samuels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New Job! -2UigK
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:16:03 +
I've been trying to write a rule that looks at the From: li
Justin Mason wrote:
have you seen this?
http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/
That bug in Red Hat perl will almost definitely slow down SpamAssassin,
too, I would say. Can anyone verify?
--j.
I don't notice any difference between my RHEL 4 (not affected) and my
R
Greg Troxel wrote:
Sort of related, occasionally some messages on the list get so many
points that my MTA rejects them (score > 10). I'd like to not do that,
since it seems rude to the list (although ezmlm seems to not really
care). I'm guessing that I need a custom rule to assign negative poin
my organization tries to make sure everything we send
out to our users is well edited. These messages are all horrible when it
comes to the content and grammar. You would think they should be able to
tell the difference.
Richard
Jake Maul wrote:
Greetings,
I've recently been getting more simple drug-related spam that has no
real obfuscation and often doesn't get flagged with anything other
than HTML_MESSAGE (0.0) and BAYES_XX (generally 50-99).
A few sample Subject lines:
Subject: Use Generik Viagra and forget about y
ave ???
No, spamcop is for spam sources, not sources based on the type of their
connection. If one of the hosts in the list is a spam originator,
chances are that piece of mail is probably spam as well. Spam sources do
send through relays, so this information is quite valuable.
Richard
ts, you'll see some
with lastexternal or something similar. That's how you tell SA to check
the one that contacted your system.
Richard
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Eduardo Júnior wrote on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:58:25 -0300:
Peguei of the includes updates_spamassassin_org.cf and put in
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf and I made a copy of my *. cf / etc /
spamassassin to maintain consistently referenced in the path includes.
Not sure w
Many do. That is why 587 is becoming popular for authenticated mail.
Without it, many users would notice, as they would no longer be able to
use their work's SMTP for those email addresses.
Richard
Per Jessen wrote:
body PND_STOCK_PAYI /[^a-z](P[^a-z]{0,4}A[^a-z]{0,4}Y[^a-z]{0,4}I[^a-z]
Pay88)/i
(all on one line of course).
In SA3.2.5, I get the following message:
[5183] info: config: invalid regexp for rule PND_STOCK_PAYI: /[^a-z
(P[^a-z]{0,2}A[^a-z]{0,2}Y[^a-z]{0: missing or invalid de
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing
the headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL
checks. So I left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some
strange entries (sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these
do
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 7/2/2008 6:05 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there an easy way to detect the registrar of a domain through DNS?
For example - can I easilly figure out if an email I'm processing is
hosted by GoDaddy or Tucows?
Here's what I'm thinking. I think there's some expensive and
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 16:47 +0200, Alex Woick wrote:
> Richard Johnson schrieb am 04.07.2008 06:35:
> > I then reinstall:
> > apt-get install spamassassin
> [...]
> > Suggested packages:
> > razor libnet-ident-perl libio-socket-ssl-perl pyzor libmail-dkim
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 16:47 +0200, Alex Woick wrote:
> Richard Johnson schrieb am 04.07.2008 06:35:
> > I then reinstall:
> > apt-get install spamassassin
> [...]
> > Suggested packages:
> > razor libnet-ident-perl libio-socket-ssl-perl pyzor libmail-dkim
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 12:39 +0200, Alex Woick wrote:
> Richard Johnson schrieb am 03.07.2008 10:58:
>
> > check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! at
> > /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 164.
>
> > [9086] dbg:
With this in mind it started to look like a perl issue:
> I have just spotted the line: "No /usr/bin/perl found"
So I checked:
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1.1M 2007-12-04 09:18 perl
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1.1M 2007-12-04 09:18 perl5.8.8
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37K 2007-12-04 09:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:53 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:38 +0100, Richard Johnson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:34 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> > > If you're missing pre files, I would suggest reinstalling SA. A normal
>
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:34 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 06:01:21PM +0100, Richard Johnson wrote:
> > As the .pre files are missing, what would I do to rectify it? What
> > should they contain?
>
> If you're missing pre files, I would suggest
Marc Perkel wrote:
Michele Neylon wrote:
On 2 Jul 2008, at 19:56, Marc Perkel wrote:
Again - it's not to figure out where spam comes from. It's figuring
out where non-spam comes from. I think there are registrars out
there that don't have any spam domains registered.
What are you t
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 16:34 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Leaving the evolution plugin thing to one side for now.
> >
> > I don't have any .pre files. /etc/spamassassin is empty.
>
> See, there's your problem.
>
Thank you, Karsten. I've learned the [ctrl] + [l] now. My apologies, I
di
Marc Perkel wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.07.08 13:22, Henrik K wrote:
If lesser registrar means that it's probably ham, why couldn't someone use
that to add some negative scores or use it as a part of whitelist
trustworthiness? Even if it's handful of domains, it's useful. If
Hello, this is the first time I've used a 'list' so if I have posted in
the wrong context or using the wrong protocol please forgive my blunder.
Let me try again as clearly I did something wrong and 'hijacked' a
thread accidentally.
Can someone help me with Spamassassin?
Here is an overview of wh
Hello, this is the first time I've used a 'list' so if I have posted in
the wrong context or using the wrong protocol please forgive my blunder.
Can someone help me with Spamassassin?
Here is an overview of where I am at:
I'm running Ubuntu gutsy and have spamassassin installed. The original
plan
taken?
use sa-update, RDJ is afaik obsolete.
OK.
BTW, with RDJ I could choose which rulest update automatically and which
not.
How could I setup sa-learn so that it updates ruleset different the
standard one's, such as 'sought ruleset'.
Thanks,
rocsca
sa-upda
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, June 27, 2008 03:09, Jo Rhett wrote:
Personal attacks are not relevant to the topic.
hmm
AppleMail is the only mua i have seen that cant make a reply to maillist
without sending cc
you talk like its my problem right ?
is AppleMail the only option you h
so-on, but for some reason it does not
appear that Bayes is being used. It doesn't show up in the tests list on any
emails, at any rate. I checked permissions and configuration and all looks OK.
Can anyone suggest
what I might be missing? TIA.
Richard
NGSS wrote:
Hi,
I am losing confident in SA, the training process is pretty slow or it
doesn’t seem to be learning.
I am training SA with around 30-50 manually identified spam (moving
spam mails to and spam folder created in squirrelmail and crond the
sa-train command on that folder every
Marcin Praczko wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure that I am writing to correct list, but maybe you will
help me.
On one of my server qmail has been installed, SpamAssassin and
qmail-scanner.
There is a several virtual domains, and Spam filter is working quite OK.
But I have some message
Has anyone tested SpamAssassin with FreeBSD 7? Are there any known problems? I
use SA with MIMEDefang/Sendmail. TIA.
Richard
Hos safe is it to pump up the score for the ANY_BOUNCE_MESSAGE ?
Is it bug free, so I can give it 5 or 10 points ?
Is anyone doing this ? (Maybe a step to far)
Greetings Richard
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Graham Murray wrote:
>>> If you publish a suitable SPF record th
Andrew Hearn wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/961075
I've only seen one so far but apart from the 0.0 BAYES_50 (I will
learn this message), does anyone have rules that pushes this kind of
message over 5.0?
thanks!
Andrew
pts rule name description
--
--
ou know the contacts of any service providers
associations that I could share this with?
You can email me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your help will be appreciated,
Regards Richard.
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Seriously...
How hard is it to setup the MX boxen to only allow 4 email addresses to pass
for that particular domain, rejecting all others in the SMTP conversation?
Unless the customer is dropping BIG DADDY $$$ with you, tell him policy
change and that he isn't losing
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
--- original message ---
From: Tony Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 26 February 2008 5:54 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Yahoo Deferred
Sorry for the Off Topic thread but I'm at a loss.
I
Marc Perkel wrote:
Mark Johnson wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Because there is occasionally some server doing something very weird
you might have to open up port 25 one some specific IP who is
running something really dumb. I think I've had to do this only once
or twice. But once you open up
Marc Perkel wrote:
Richard Frovarp wrote:
We issue tcp-reset via iptables and have never heard of any problems.
Doing this also makes connecting servers fail out quickest, instead
of waiting to timeout.
Interesting. How do you do that?
-A ports_deny -d de.st.i.p -p tcp -m tcp --dport 25
Marc Perkel wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Didn't qmail have a problem if it hit a 'dead' primary mx server first?
Qmail has a problem if it gets a 421 on the lowest MX. But if the
lowest MX is totally dead Qmail is fine with it.
We issue tcp-reset via iptables and have never heard
1 - 100 of 373 matches
Mail list logo
