yes_seen as well.
Also, when in doubt, run w/ -D to see what's going on.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Russell Jones wrote:
I am running a global bayes database. The file permissions for the database
is 0666. For some reason I just realized that sa-learn is not remembering
the me
I am running a global bayes database. The file permissions for the
database is 0666. For some reason I just realized that sa-learn is not
remembering the messages it's already learned from. I've checked the
bayes file permissions and everything else I could think of, but if you
run sa-learn, wa
It is completely accurate and copied and pasted from the message file
itself.
I am running Exim. What configuration should I be looking at on how to
block messages with return paths like that?
Dave Funk wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Matt wrote:
The MTA never really sees whats in the headers.
I ran a spamassassin -D on the message and the biggest thing that made
it take a hit was the almost 3 points it took off of the score because
of the bayes db being only a 1% probability. Supposedly it says its
learned spam from about 500 messages, and ham from about 5000. Maybe I
should put aut
Forgot to put this address in CC. In case anyone is interested in
following the convo:
Original Message
Subject:
Re: No SPF_FAIL flag, why?
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:27:52 -0600
From:
Russell Jones <[EM
This email was received and is very much spam, (February 77% off, Viagra
HTML spam), and was sent to this user FROM this user (which they
obviously did not spam themselves). What can I do to make the score
higher than what it was scored, as well as why didn't the SPF fail? The
record for pitter
For some reason spamd is not scoring email nearly as high as
spamassassin scores if you run the message through manually. I do not
understand this, and it is causing spam to get through that should have
been blocked. As you can see when running spamassassin manually it
scored it a 7.5, but spam
If I have multiple sa-learn processes
going at the same time, can that corrupt the database and/or cause some other
problem that I don't want to happen? Or is it safe to have the following in
crontab for example:
@daily sa-learn --spam
/home/eggycrew/imap/eggycrew.com/rjones/Maildir/.INBOX
Okay, but other than that it'll begin using a global database for every
email account it is protecting, correct?
- Original Message -
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: Global configuration ques
is a production box,
so I want to make sure I do it correctly before doing it! =)
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russell Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Global configur
I asked this on the mailing list a
while ago, however still can't seem to figure it out. What I want to accomplish
is to set spamassassin to use the spam database it creates globally. So that if
it learns emails as spam in one user's email address, it will apply what it has
learned to every
Sorry if this is covered somewhere in the
documentation, and if so can someone be nice enough to point it to me :) I can't
seem to locate it.
I would like to set spamassassin to use a site-wide
configuration, so that when I tell it to sa-learn, it will apply what it learns
to every single
12 matches
Mail list logo
