On 12/02/16 20:49, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 2/12/2016 3:45 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes
databases on
several different servers running
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one of the servers though, the
database is not accepted.
Are the servers all
On 12/02/16 21:40, Kris Deugau wrote:
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one
On 12/02/16 21:40, Kris Deugau wrote:
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/02/16 20:31, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 12 February 2016 at 17:29:23, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
As per advice from this list, I have been re-using my bayes databases on
several different servers running SA. On one
On 22/12/15 10:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.12.2015 um 10:26 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
In terms of ClamAV, I've had next to zero hit rates for new viruses
arriving over email in the last few months (although it is being updated
regularly) - so I'm starting to wonder if there is any point
On 22/12/15 08:04, Axb wrote:
On 12/21/2015 11:46 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
For the past few days we've been hit with Word macro viruses/spam that
isn't being tagged by clamav or spamassassin, and I thought someone
might be able to take a look:
http://pastebin.com/cAWcAbm2
This one still isn't
On 12/12/15 23:43, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On December 12, 2015 8:33:28 PM Sebastian Arcus <s.ar...@open-t.co.uk>
wrote:
I guess I must be using the default settings - as I don't think I've
configured anything in particular for AWL
change default /16 cidr to new default /24 for ipv4, fo
On 12/12/15 19:57, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with
the > following report:
> &g
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
following report:
Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM
On 12/12/15 13:06, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Sebastian Arcus skrev den 2015-12-12 12:51:
Why
would AWL now tilt things heavily towards ham, after the message has
just been learned as spam?
its how AWL works
It seems to be making things worse instead
of better. Unless I am misunderstanding
On 12/12/15 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
One of my servers received a spam message which SA missed, with the
following report:
-0.4 AWLAWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation
of From: address
After learning the messages as spam
On 03/12/15 01:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Alex:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote:
On 2015-12-02 09:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Perfect - that's exactly the sort of real-life based advice I was
looking
for. Many thank
On 03/12/15 00:29, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience
On 02/12/15 12:56, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 02/12/15 09:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
After properly configuring a bayes database and training it following
the great advice from this list, I am now
On 02/12/15 12:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
definite "yes"
On 01/12/15 18:59, RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:45:25 +
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
After
setting up a site-wide bayes database as per the wiki instructions
and fixing file permissions etc., and feeding it about 300 spam
messages (I don't get a lot of spam in general) and 12,000 ham
After properly configuring a bayes database and training it following
the great advice from this list, I am now having this problem where some
spam is not detected properly due to a shortcircuit rule. However, I'm
having some difficulty figuring out which one of them is causing the
problem.
On 02/12/15 09:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
After properly configuring a bayes database and training it following
the great advice from this list, I am now having this problem where some
spam is not detected properly due to a shortcircuit rule
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
definite "yes" or "no" answer. I am hoping that people with experience
of using SA in various environments might be able to throw
OK - this might be a basic question, but recently the detection rate on
my SA install has been really unreliable, so I decided that the first
step is to be sure it is using the public dns blocklists and razor. My
setup:
1. Spamassassin 3.4.1
2. I have Bind configured as recursive,
On 30/11/15 16:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.11.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
OK - this might be a basic question, but recently the detection rate on
my SA install has been really unreliable, so I decided that the first
step is to be sure it is using the public dns blocklists
On 30/11/15 18:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.11.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
spamassassin -D < /path/to/spam-example.eml
Thank you Harald. I did - and it looks like SA does contact lots of
DNSBL's and it receives various messages in reply. Nothing that looks
like failu
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
