Re: I am NOT a spammer

Inline. . . List Mail User wrote: ... jdow wrote: From: "Aecio F. Neto" [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been trying to post to this list using my original subscriber email address. Unfortunately, It has been not possible up to now. I am using a

Re: Block messages with null sender

Yeah, the reason not to block such is that DSN (Delivery Status Notifications) are supposed to come in this way. If you block such, your users will not be happy ... . jay Craig Jackson wrote: Joao Gazzoni wrote: Hello, Does anyone know how to block messages that come with a blank sender

Re: Spamd going nuts - spawning heaps of children

Yeah, I see this, too, 3.0.1. Solaris. iPlanet Messaging Server, using spamd. I don't process a lot of mail, as I only have 5 users that accept mail from the internet, and it's a small machine. I use the startup line for spamd like this: spamd -d --max-children=2 --max-conn-per-child=3

Re: Spamd going nuts - spawning heaps of children

is useless :) It does appear to be stable though with a script in cron killing off the spamd processes and then restarting them. Not ideal though :) Gav On 12/11/04 3:18 AM, "jplesset" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I see this, too, 3.0.1. Solaris. iPlanet

Re: spam mails with missing from

I would advise against marking mails without from as spam. Internet RFC requires that DSN (Delivery Status Notice) not have a from. So, if you eliminate such, you are dropping valid/useful mails. jay Matt Kettler wrote: At 11:03 AM 11/8/2004 -0300, Leandro wrote: How can I mark as spam mails

Re: spam mails with missing from

You are correct. I apologize. jay Matt Kettler wrote: At 10:57 AM 11/8/2004, jplesset wrote: I would advise against marking mails without from as spam. Internet RFC requires that DSN (Delivery Status Notice) not have a from. So, if you eliminate such, you are dropping valid/useful mails. AFAIK

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Oban, the log entry you see does not appear to be an error, but confirmation of what you set. Child processes are killed off after processing 3 messages. Then a new one is started. That's what you're seeing. jay Oban Lambie wrote: Ok, this seems to be a *lot* more stable from a memory

Increasing numbers of spamd processes? 3.0.1

Hello, all: I have just upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1. Solaris 9, iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2p2. Everything appears to be working ok, except .. . On startup, I get 4 spamd processes. This number increases with each message I receive. I have set the max children to 2, and the

Re: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

You might be able to extract an original message from your mail server, depending on what that is. One of the reasons I installed iPlanet Messaging Server is so I can do exactly that. jay Craig W. Shaver wrote: You can import a .pst to outlook express and then export it to netscape. Then

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Oban, I'm having a somewhat similar issue, though a different environment. SpamAssassin 3.0.1, Solaris 9, and iPlanet Messaigng 5.2p2. I find that when I started spamd,with no special flags, other than -d, I got a large number of spamd processes running. This number increased over about 20

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Hopefully . . . I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so. My server is much smaller than yours, and has only 256 megs of ram, so it's kind of important to keep these things in line. . . Sparc RAM is so expensive... jay Oban

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

SA 3.0.1, yes. So, because I see 11-12 processes, even with -m 3, what should I do about it? jay Rick Macdougall wrote: jplesset wrote: Hopefully . . . I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so. My server is much smaller