RE: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

2017-08-10 Thread techlist06
>surely, it makes no sense blow up the database with already 100% >classified samples - you even don't do that uncnditional with a >hand-trained database (at least not forever, at the begin it makes sense >to get additional tokens) I think you misunderstood my question. I meant that as I look at

RE: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

2017-08-10 Thread techlist06
Update: Still NOT working, but I'm giving it hell trying to figure out why :) First a couple of answers to other's questions: - John, others, not an ISP, high is relative I'm sure but the volume is much higher than I can duplicate and review every flagged message. Right now running at about 10