SM wrote:
At 14:25 31-07-2007, mouss wrote:
If they faked the From header, then they are seriously broken.
They are not faking the From header.
what is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In an NDR from a remote site?
Subject: NDN: (Suspected Spam:) soggy mirror
X-Mailer: FirstClass 8.2 (build
At 13:43 01-08-2007, mouss wrote:
SM wrote:
At 14:25 31-07-2007, mouss wrote:
If they faked the From header, then they are seriously broken.
They are not faking the From header.
what is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In an NDR from a remote site?
I doubt that the header was written as such by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this in my inboy -is someone trying a new look of bounces?
I have replaced actual recipient with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If they faked the From header, then they are seriously broken.
Wolfang Hamann
Received: from fc.williston.com (HELO williston.com)
At 14:25 31-07-2007, mouss wrote:
If they faked the From header, then they are seriously broken.
They are not faking the From header.
Subject: NDN: (Suspected Spam:) soggy mirror
X-Mailer: FirstClass 8.2 (build 8.094)
The non-delivery notification from that mailer is broken.
Regards,
-sm
I just found this in my inboy -is someone trying a new look of bounces?
I have replaced actual recipient with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wolfang Hamann
Received: from fc.williston.com (HELO williston.com) (68.112.246.229)
by mydomain.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2007 04:53:13 -
Message-id: [EMAIL
On Tue, 2 May 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary W. Smith wrote:
How does ClamAV catch them if they cannot unzip them?
...
That's when you start getting viruses in emails that say The
password is Mickey Mouse's girlfriend's name.
What a lot of effort. Why not just enforce a policy that
their software on
my clients though (one of the best AV packages I've ever
used).
Jason
-Original Message-From: Tracey Gates
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 4:37
PMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Way OT:
What do you use for anti-virus (Linux
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:48 PM
To:
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Way OT: What do you
use for anti-virus (Linux)
Check out these guys
http://www.centralcommand.com/
their product, Vexira antivirus, has a similar price scheme to the extint
:51 PM
To: Alejandro Lengua
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Way OT: What do you
use for anti-virus (Linux)
I used to use them. However, you know the password protected zip
file viruses? My customers were up in arms as these flowed right
through. However, ClamAV caught them
From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you know the password protected zip
file viruses? My customers were up in arms as these flowed right
through. However, ClamAV caught them with ease.
Gary W. Smith wrote:
How does ClamAV catch them if they cannot unzip them?
A couple of ways. One
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I have ever
used was RAV. Until is
was bought out by Microsoft. I have since been using ClamAV but it sure uses
allot of RAM.
What do you use?
Am Montag, 1. Mai 2006 21:18 schrieb :
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I
have ever used was RAV. Until is was bought out by Microsoft. I
have since been using ClamAV but it sure uses allot of RAM.
What do you use?
clamav.
clamd uses some 2.8% of my ram
having a test server
to see the effects in case it screws something up.
Tracey GatesLead Developer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From:
Ricardo Oliveira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,
May 01, 2006 3:30 PMTo:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re: Way OT: What do you use
wrote:
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I
have ever used was RAV. Until is was bought out by Microsoft. I
have since been using ClamAV but it sure uses allot of RAM.
I use both ClamAV and BitDefender's free Linux product
On May 1, 2006, at 13:21, wrote:
| At work:
|
| mailscanner calls both sophos av (via sweep) and spamassassin
|
|
| At home:
|
| mimedefang calls both clamav (via clamd) and spamassassin
|
|
| I have less RAM on the home machine than the work machines, and
ClamAV
| seems to do just
On May 1, 2006, at 13:30, Ricardo Oliveira wrote:
John,
I use sophos too, but I though I'd drop the note on a
memory-and-performance-saver: Sophie is a deamon which received the
messages, processos them and returns the result infected or not
infected instead of forking a new sweep process
Is BitDefender stable?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: Way OT: What do you use for anti-virus (Linux)
| wrote:
| I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I
I use MailScanner and Qmail-Scanner depending on the server.
- Original Message -
From: John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ricardo Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Way OT: What do you use for anti-virus (Linux
wrote:
Is BitDefender stable?
I haven't had any troubles with it. It's free, but not open source... and most
importantly the virus definitions are updated regularly.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
wrote:
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I
have ever used was RAV. Until is was bought out by Microsoft. I
have since been using ClamAV but it sure uses allot of RAM.
I use both ClamAV and BitDefender's free Linux
server to see the effects in case
it screws something up.
Tracey Gates
Lead Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo Oliveira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:30 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Way OT: What do you use for anti
schreef:
Is BitDefender stable?
I have been using ClamAV and BitDefender together for over a year in
several mail servers, invoked by Amavisd-new. The products are very stable.
Jo
Check out these guyshttp://www.centralcommand.com/their product, Vexira antivirus, has a similar price scheme to the extint RAV
On 5/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I have ever used was RAV.Until iswas bought out by Microsoft.I
.
- Original Message -
From:
Alejandro Lengua
To:
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: Way OT: What do you use for
anti-virus (Linux)
Check out these guyshttp://www.centralcommand.com/their
product, Vexira
- Original Message -
From: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I have
ever used was RAV. Until is
was bought out by Microsoft. I have since been using ClamAV but it sure
uses allot of RAM.
What do
Ladies and gents, I'm about to start some gentle investigations into
greylisting, but I need some advice on which policy server to use.
It's off topic, so if you choose to reply privately I'll summarise.
I'm asking here because I think you're closer to the leading edge of
spam control than the
On Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 22:02 Andrew Donkin wrote:
Policy daemon, http://policyd.sourceforge.net/download.html
SQLgrey, http://sqlgrey.sourceforge.net/
Maybe nothing for you, but I'd like to mention it for others who want to
use greylisting in postfix without needing a database (i.e.
I'd suggest postgrey, here the latest announcement:
http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/postgrey/msg00960.html
It's running stable since years for me, and there's very good support onthe (low volume) mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have had very good luck with Postfix
GLD(http://www.gasmi.net/gld.html). It
Andrew Donkin a écrit :
Ladies and gents, I'm about to start some gentle investigations into
greylisting, but I need some advice on which policy server to use.
It's off topic, so if you choose to reply privately I'll summarise.
I'm asking here because I think you're closer to the leading
29 matches
Mail list logo
