Re: 70_sare_spoof.cf False Pos - Bank of America

2006-09-22 Thread Loren Wilton
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kelson Vibber [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SpamAssassin Users users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 7:40 PM Subject: Re: 70_sare_spoof.cf False Pos - Bank of America *sigh* Assuming this really is legit... I hate it when prime phishing targets decide

70_sare_spoof.cf False Pos - Bank of America

2006-09-21 Thread qqqq
Looks like they are no longer using: Received =~ /\.bankofamerica\.com/i Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on san.MUNGED.com X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.3 required=5.2 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=0.879,

Re: 70_sare_spoof.cf False Pos - Bank of America

2006-09-21 Thread Kelson Vibber
wrote: Looks like they are no longer using: Received =~ /\.bankofamerica\.com/i snip Received: from outbd-pstfx.customercenter.net (outbd-pstfx.customercenter.net [208.235.248.20]) *sigh* Assuming this really is legit... I hate it when prime phishing targets decide to make things

Re: 70_sare_spoof.cf False Pos - Bank of America

2006-09-21 Thread qqqq
*sigh* Assuming this really is legit... I hate it when prime phishing targets decide to make things easier for the phishers by making their own mail look suspicious, thereby training users to ignore warning signs. My favorite (and I use that term loosely) is Symantec -- a computer security