On 2015-12-16 14:21 -0800, jdow wrote:
> One thing worth pointing out is if this CAN be done refusing to do it
> yourself is a shallow gesture.
No, it is not. Refusing to take part in what you believe is wrong, even
if you know the wrong will be done eventually because the Zeitgeist
favors it, i
On 2015-12-16 14:15, Wrolf wrote:
Video/audio/stills are a problem.
How about crowd sourcing ISIS identification, with sufficient votes (of
sufficient reputation) leading to RBL style blocking by IP address, and
retroactive elimination of posts spread across all media?
BTW, I am aware that Face
Video/audio/stills are a problem.
How about crowd sourcing ISIS identification, with sufficient votes (of
sufficient reputation) leading to RBL style blocking by IP address, and
retroactive elimination of posts spread across all media?
BTW, I am aware that Facebook has programmers. They seem not
On 16 Dec 2015, at 13:39, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Bill Cole wrote:
ISIS uses any "social media" where the proprietors welcome them. That
is a business decision of for-profit private enterprises based in
lightly-regulated jurisdictions (mostly the US and EU) who mostly
have no
Wrolf,
Facebook (et al.) already have extremely powerful engines and many engineers
working on anti-spam/anti-fraud technologies. They're quite good at keeping
most of the spam out of your Timeline. They don't need "our" help.
The same techniques could plausibly be used to block ISIS propagan
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Bill Cole wrote:
ISIS uses any "social media" where the proprietors welcome them. That is a
business decision of for-profit private enterprises based in
lightly-regulated jurisdictions (mostly the US and EU) who mostly have not
thought about that choice in those terms.
T
Thanks Bill. I guess I should restate my question.
Would it be practical for
Twitter/Facebook/SnapChat/WhatsApp/Microsoft/Telegraph to use SpamAssassin
like techniques of Bayesian filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social
media?
This is an invitation for discussion, not a rhetorical questio
On 15 Dec 2015, at 23:19, Wrolf wrote:
Stop me if you've heard this one.
Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian
filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media?
I've definitely heard similarly unfunny and poorly thought-out jokes
before. Bill Gates had one
On 12/15/2015 11:19 PM, Wrolf wrote:
Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian
filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media?
Bayes would have a high potential for false positives... such as
blocking a news story about ISIS, or blocking a discussion about how
Probably yes. But talk about opening a can of worms. If you can detect
ISIS you can detect anything.
On 12/15/15 20:19, Wrolf wrote:
Stop me if you've heard this one.
Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian
filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media?
Stop me if you've heard this one.
Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian
filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media?
Wrolf
wr...@wrolf.net
11 matches
Mail list logo
