Hallo!
Just curious if anyone has ever found a 'clean' way to handle the 'damage'
done to the AWL when someone's mail is blocked by a false positive, and
the sender is stupid enough to keep retrying the offending mail?
I would rather not turn off AWL. I like the way it gives a negative score
From: Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:56:53 -0400 (EDT)
Just curious if anyone has ever found a 'clean' way to handle the 'damage'
done to the AWL when someone's mail is blocked by a false positive, and
the sender is stupid enough to keep retrying
Charles Gregory wrote:
Hallo!
Just curious if anyone has ever found a 'clean' way to handle the
'damage' done to the AWL when someone's mail is blocked by a false
positive, and the sender is stupid enough to keep retrying the
offending mail?
any manual learning (sa-learn?) should delete
