Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread jdow
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Balzi Andrea wrote: > -Original Message- [...] > > every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. > > > > My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and > > Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? >

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Balzi Andrea wrote: > Thanks All! > > Now I've about 80MB for child > > Andrea > > You're distinctly NOT welcome. I don't help folks who outright blacklist whole ISP's with millions of legitimate users in order to prevent a portion of spam. Particularly when that ISP is one I'm using. Perhaps

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Balzi Andrea
Thanks All! Now I've about 80MB for child Andrea

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Matt Kettler
Balzi Andrea wrote: >> -Original Message- >> > [...] > >>> every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. >>> >>> My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and >>> Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? >>> >> That is a bit exc

Re: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Jeff Chan
On Friday, September 29, 2006, 12:32:08 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Balzi Andrea wrote: >> BLACKLIST_URI > You should use the ws.surbl.org version of this blacklist instead. > See here for more info: > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SURBL Though ws.surbl.org is the direct descendant of BLACK

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Bowie Bailey
Balzi Andrea wrote: > > -Original Message- > [...] > > > every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. > > > > > > My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and > > > Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? > > > > That is a bit excessive.

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Balzi Andrea
> -Original Message- [...] > > every child it occupies approximately 450MB of RAM. > > > > My server is a GNU/Linux Debian 3.1r2 with spamassassin v3.1.5 and > > Perl v5.8.4 Aren't it too many every 450MB for single child? > > That is a bit excessive. My first guess is that you have WAY

RE: Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Bowie Bailey
Balzi Andrea wrote: > Hi > > I've the problem with my spamassassin. > I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus). > My spamassassin start with the follow command line: > > /usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10 > --max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-

Ammount of the RAM used by spamd childs

2006-09-29 Thread Balzi Andrea
Hi I've the problem with my spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin with exim (MTA) and clamav (AntiVirus). My spamassassin start with the follow command line: /usr/sbin/spamd --syslog=local4 --create-prefs --max-children 10 --max-conn-per-child=100 --helper-home-dir -d --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid