Re: BLACKLISTED mails

2010-07-16 Thread Angel L. Mateo
El 13/07/10 17:22, Giampaolo Tomassoni escribió: I don't think that's going to help - it's not going to tell us why it's blacklisted. Also I suspect those headers aren't added by SA alone. AFAIK BLACKLISTED isn't added by SA like that - blacklist rule should show up in tests=[], which is

BLACKLISTED mails

2010-07-13 Thread Angel L. Mateo
Hello, I have a mail that always is marked as spam. The only information I get is: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 64 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=-5 tagged_above=-4 required=5 BLACKLISTED tests=[]

Re: BLACKLISTED mails

2010-07-13 Thread Daniel Lemke
Tfo: 868887590 Fax: 86337 Please post the raw mail on pastebin (http://pastebin.com/). Without having a closer look on the headers we'll not be able to give you any advice. Daniel -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/BLACKLISTED-mails-tp29148762p29148883.html Sent

Re: BLACKLISTED mails

2010-07-13 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:14 +0200, Angel L. Mateo wrote: I have a mail that always is marked as spam. The only information I get is: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 64 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=-5 tagged_above=-4

Re: BLACKLISTED mails

2010-07-13 Thread RW
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Daniel Lemke le...@jam-software.com wrote: Angel Mateo wrote: Hello, I have a mail that always is marked as spam. The only information I get is: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 64 X-Spam-Level:

RE: BLACKLISTED mails

2010-07-13 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
I don't think that's going to help - it's not going to tell us why it's blacklisted. Also I suspect those headers aren't added by SA alone. AFAIK BLACKLISTED isn't added by SA like that - blacklist rule should show up in tests=[], which is empty. And the score isn't consistent 64 and -5.