comparity wrote:
spamis wrote:
Hi comparity,
has you could fix the problem updating SA?
No, not as far as I can tell. I still get the same spam, and no
indication that bayes has been applied.
--
I'm using an older version of qmail-scanner-st. I have saw in the
comparity wrote:
Do you use sa-update?
No I don't. However, I have just run it. restarted spamassassin
(service spamassassin restart), and I'll see what happens.
Hi comparity,
has you could fix the problem updating SA?
--
View this message in context:
spamis wrote:
comparity wrote:
Do you use sa-update?
No I don't. However, I have just run it. restarted spamassassin
(service spamassassin restart), and I'll see what happens.
Hi comparity,
has you could fix the problem updating SA?
No, not as far as I can
Luis Hernn Otegui wrote:
2008/2/17, comparity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the caught
messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the
caught messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my uncaught spam into a folder for the
purposes of learning, and run sa-learn from time
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the
caught messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my uncaught spam into a folder for the
purposes of learning, and run sa-learn from time
2008/2/17, comparity [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have found that in the last few months a lot of mail has been coming
through. I believe that the bayes filter isn't working. None of the caught
messages include a bayes score.
I have dutifully put all of my uncaught spam into a folder for the
