On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/23/20 9:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Did you see my mention of this earlier?
Yes, I did see it.
That's a bit more invasive of a change than I was hoping to do for this task.
I had been waiting to reply to your earlier message to test some things
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/23/20 2:15 PM, John Hardin wrote:
spamass-milter has a -u flag for a username to pass to SA. If these are
single-recipient messages that may be enough to reliably tie into per-user
config to disable the RBL check.
It seems as if spamass-milter
On 12/22/20 4:56 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to bypass RBL checks for a specific address?
Thank you all.
I believe I have been able to get the result I desired and learn a few
things in the process.
TL;DR: Setting scores to 0 in the specific recipient's
~/.spamassassin
On 12/23/20 9:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Did you see my mention of this earlier?
Yes, I did see it.
That's a bit more invasive of a change than I was hoping to do for this
task.
I had been waiting to reply to your earlier message to test some things
that you recommended.
As you will see
On 12/23/20 2:15 PM, John Hardin wrote:
spamass-milter has a -u flag for a username to pass to SA. If these are
single-recipient messages that may be enough to reliably tie into
per-user config to disable the RBL check.
It seems as if spamass-milter is using the -u to specify a default user.
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
That's all considerably more complicated than I'm comfortable with at the
moment.
Did you see my mention of this earlier?
https://milter-manager.osdn.jp/reference/introduction.html
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On 12/23/20 2:21 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
You definitely would know if it were.
One would think.
My head is in a different project at the moment, and I can't tell you
exactly how things are configured without going back and looking.
/If/ things are configured to load per user settings from
On 12/23/20 3:32 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
- In my case I run every message through SA, diverting spam into a
quarantine directory and passing the rest to Postfix for delivery.
I don't quarantine anything on this system.
Spam is tagged if the score is between 5 and 15.
Spam is rejected
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:01:25 -0600 (CST)
Dave Funk wrote:
> Because it's assumed that DNS related stuff may take some time those
> rules (if configured to run) are launched early in the processing of
> a message.
A couple of years ago some changes were made to support RBLS being
short-circuited
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 20:44 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Fhis requirement is almost exactly rgew opposite of something I've been
running for years:
- In my case I run every message through SA, diverting spam into
a quarantine directory and passing the rest to Postfix for delivery.
- In your
Bill Cole wrote:
On 23 Dec 2020, at 13:57, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/22/20 11:03 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Do you have a setup that supports per-user preferences? e.g.: real
system accounts.
Sort of. The recipient is a real Unix account. However I don't think
my milter is configured to use
On 23 Dec 2020, at 13:57, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/22/20 11:03 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Do you have a setup that supports per-user preferences? e.g.: real
system accounts.
Sort of. The recipient is a real Unix account. However I don't think
my milter is configured to use per recipient
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
I have about 2,000 messages a day that come in to my mail server for all
recipients with the exception of one specific (set of) recipient(s). That
(set of) recipient(s) receive 20,000 - 30,000 messages a day. They are very
specific messages for an
On 12/23/20 1:37 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
If all you want is for a particular class of recipients (at the envelope
RCPT level) not be passed to spamass-milter inside sendmail that can be
done with a bit of hacking of your sendmail config and the milter.
Please elaborate.
I'm not opposed to
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
Context is Sendmail, spamass-milter, and SpamAssassin (spamd).
I didn't see any way to have spamass-milter bypass, much less conditionally
bypass. Nor did I see a way to have Sendmail conditionally bypass a milter.
If all you want is for a
@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bypass RBL checks for specific
address That may not work for what the OP wanted.Because it's assumed that DNS
related stuff may take some time those rules (if configured to run) are
launched early in the processing of a message.So if the OP wants to completely
avoid
On 12/23/20 12:40 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
if you want to disable RBL for one single ip, then add it to
trusted_networks in local.cf
As indicated in the message you replied to, "I'm wanting to disable
filtering for a recipient email address, which may receive messages from
IP addresses all
On 12/23/20 1:01 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
That may not work for what the OP wanted.
O.o?
Because it's assumed that DNS related stuff may take some time those
rules (if configured to run) are launched early in the processing of a
message.
So if the OP wants to completely avoid running RBL
+02:00)
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bypass RBL checks for specific address
On 12/22/20 11:56 PM, Axb wrote:
> whitelist_to ?
My understanding is that whitelist_to, more_spam_to, and all_spam_to
behave the same way and effectively just alter the scoring offset.
It se
On 2020-12-23 19:59, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/22/20 11:56 PM, Axb wrote:
I'm wanting to not run RBL tests for the specific recipient email
address.
you will for this specifik task need a custom plugin in spamassassin
if you just want to disable rbl test then add the ip to trusted_networks
: 12/23/20 20:59 (GMT+02:00) To:
users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bypass RBL checks for specific
address On 12/22/20 11:56 PM, Axb wrote:> whitelist_to ?My understanding is
that whitelist_to, more_spam_to, and all_spam_to behave the same way and
effectively just alter the scor
On 2020-12-23 19:56, Grant Taylor wrote:
Response Policy Zone(s) are neat and can do a LOT of things. But I
don't think it's proper for my task at hand.
if you want to disable RBL for one single ip, then add it to
trusted_networks in local.cf
if you want to disable one single recipient
On 12/22/20 11:56 PM, Axb wrote:
whitelist_to ?
My understanding is that whitelist_to, more_spam_to, and all_spam_to
behave the same way and effectively just alter the scoring offset.
It seems as if the tests are still run, and it's just the score is
artificially offset based on which
On 12/22/20 11:03 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
Do you have a setup that supports per-user preferences? e.g.: real
system accounts.
Sort of. The recipient is a real Unix account. However I don't think
my milter is configured to use per recipient filtering.
If so, you can disable off individual
Hi Rob,
On 12/22/20 6:40 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
First, I'm NOT an expert on all of this - so somebody might be able to
follow up with BETTER information, but this will hopefully point you in
the right direction.
Fair enough.
Really big snip.
First, I agree with and like your idea. For an
whitelist_to ?
On 12/23/20 12:56 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to bypass RBL checks for a specific address?
I've tried the all_spam_to option, but it looks like it artificially
lowers the score and still runs normal tests.
I'd like to disable RBL checks for one address.
On 22 Dec 2020, at 18:56, Grant Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to bypass RBL checks for a specific address?
I've tried the all_spam_to option, but it looks like it artificially
lowers the score and still runs normal tests.
I'd like to disable RBL checks for one address.
Do you have a setup
On 12/22/2020 6:56 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Is there a way to bypass RBL checks for a specific address? I've tried
the all_spam_to option, but it looks like it artificially lowers the
score and still runs normal tests. I'd like to disable RBL checks for
one address.
Grant,
First, I'm
Is there a way to bypass RBL checks for a specific address?
I've tried the all_spam_to option, but it looks like it artificially
lowers the score and still runs normal tests.
I'd like to disable RBL checks for one address.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
29 matches
Mail list logo
