--
Re: Joseph Brennan:
Why doesn't sendmail reject it like it does here? (..) .. Domain name
required for sender address
I cannot afford rejecting all null senders as those could be
legitimate Delivery Status Notification messages.
What I am looking is a pattern for line:
MAIL FROM: <"do not
On 08/09/10 16:10, Mike Bro wrote:
Thanks for your interest in this topic. The part of mail.log and the
qf file is at:
http://pastebin.com/0QzqLxs1
This particular example has been marked as spam, but the sender's
information didn't play a role in this classification.
Re: Joseph Brennan:
Why d
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Mike Bro wrote:
I cannot afford rejecting all null senders as those could be
legitimate Delivery Status Notification messages.
What I am looking is a pattern for line:
MAIL FROM: <"do not mock at your poetenncy - bujyj vjaqrra ppislls" <>>
while I want to allow:
MAIL FROM: <
Hi!
On Mit, 2010-09-08 at 16:45 +0100, Mike Bro wrote:
[...]
> You wrote:
> > The .qf file is not visible to SpamAssassin. SA only looks at the email
> > and headers. If you want to reject/score based on the envelope sender,
> > you will need to either do it at the MTA level or find out if sendm
On 9/8/2010 11:45 AM, Mike Bro wrote:
> Hi Bowie,
>
> You wrote:
>> The .qf file is not visible to SpamAssassin. SA only looks at the email
>> and headers. If you want to reject/score based on the envelope sender,
>> you will need to either do it at the MTA level or find out if sendmail
>> puts
Hi Bowie,
You wrote:
> The .qf file is not visible to SpamAssassin. SA only looks at the email
> and headers. If you want to reject/score based on the envelope sender,
> you will need to either do it at the MTA level or find out if sendmail
> puts the information into a header that SA can see.
On 9/8/2010 11:10 AM, Mike Bro wrote:
> Thanks for your interest in this topic. The part of mail.log and the
> qf file is at:
> http://pastebin.com/0QzqLxs1
>
> This particular example has been marked as spam, but the sender's
> information didn't play a role in this classification.
>
> Re: Joseph
Thanks for your interest in this topic. The part of mail.log and the
qf file is at:
http://pastebin.com/0QzqLxs1
This particular example has been marked as spam, but the sender's
information didn't play a role in this classification.
Re: Joseph Brennan:
> Why doesn't sendmail reject it like it do
MAIL FROM: <"some rubbish words" <>>
Why doesn't sendmail reject it like it does here?
Sep 6 04:57:26 calabash sm-mta[22772]: [ID 801593 mail.notice]
o868vKo9022772: ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<"vjaqrra scuper acntive make your
sskexxual" <>>, relay=adsl-pool-124.157.160-227.dynamic.tttmax
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, Mike Bro wrote:
Hello,
Enviroment:
latest sendmail and latest spamassassin
I am just trying to fight with spammer that used to send too many
emails. The pattern I discovered is that during smtp communication with
my incoming mail server in from field he puts something lik
On 9/7/2010 12:50 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:46 +0100, Mike Bro wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Enviroment:
>> latest sendmail and latest spamassassin
>>
>> I am just trying to fight with spammer that used to send too many emails.
>> The pattern I discovered is that during smtp c
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 16:46 +0100, Mike Bro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Enviroment:
> latest sendmail and latest spamassassin
>
> I am just trying to fight with spammer that used to send too many emails.
> The pattern I discovered is that during smtp communication with my
> incoming mail server in from f
Hello,
Enviroment:
latest sendmail and latest spamassassin
I am just trying to fight with spammer that used to send too many emails.
The pattern I discovered is that during smtp communication with my
incoming mail server in from field he puts something like:
MAIL FROM: <"some rubbish words" <>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
