Philip Prindeville wrote:
I'd rather suffer a few broken applications, or in this case, a user
having to cut a domain name out of an email and paste it into a web
browser and not be able to simply click through the message body, if
it helps maintain the clear distinction between well-formed
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Depends on whether you equate bare domains with URL's, I suppose.
If MUA's equate them with URLs, spammers will use this, and
SpamAssassin will use
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:51 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Yeah, I'll talk to the Outlook folks, and file a bug against
Thunderbird... (I think the latter only does it to be compatible with
the former...)
Yeah, good luck with
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
There is an RFC that defines what a URL looks like. A bare domain
doesn't cut it.
You want to forbid bare domains in email? Go ahead. You can forbid
anything you like.
I don't, and I doubt Matt wants to either.
But don't
Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes:
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:51 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Yeah, I'll talk to the Outlook folks, and file a bug against
Thunderbird... (I think the latter only does it to be
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:44:55 -0800
To: Spamassassin Mailing List users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Clearly bogus false positives -- on abuse contact point, no less
Hmmm. I think we need a BL for reporting ISP's that are clueless
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please, do not paste a gigantic blob of multipart MIME messages. Put it
up somewhere, raw, and simply provide a link.
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing some of these scores.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:44:55 -0800
To: Spamassassin Mailing List users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Clearly bogus false positives -- on abuse contact point, no less
Hmmm. I think we need a BL for reporting ISP's
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please, do not paste a gigantic blob of multipart MIME messages. Put it
up somewhere, raw, and simply provide a link.
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Depends on whether you equate bare domains with URL's, I suppose.
If MUA's equate them with URLs, spammers will use this, and
SpamAssassin will use it.
There is only so much braindeath in UA's that you can bend the
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Depends on whether you equate bare domains with URL's, I suppose.
If MUA's equate them with URLs, spammers will use this, and
SpamAssassin will use it.
There is only so much braindeath in UA's
Philip Prindeville wrote:
There is an RFC that defines what a URL looks like. A bare domain
doesn't cut it.
You want to forbid bare domains in email? Go ahead. You can forbid
anything you like.
I don't, and I doubt Matt wants to either.
But don't call it a test for URL's, since it's
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Depends on whether you equate bare domains with URL's, I suppose.
If MUA's equate them with URLs, spammers will use this, and
SpamAssassin will use it.
There is only so
Hmmm. I think we need a BL for reporting ISP's that are clueless as to
run filtering on their abuse mailbox (or the mailbox that's listed for
their ARIN/RIPE AbuseEmail attributes).
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing some of these scores. URL matches
when there aren't even URL's in my
Please, do not paste a gigantic blob of multipart MIME messages. Put it
up somewhere, raw, and simply provide a link.
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing some of these scores. URL matches
when there aren't even URL's in my
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please, do not paste a gigantic blob of multipart MIME messages. Put it
up somewhere, raw, and simply provide a link.
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing some of these scores. URL matches
when there
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing some of these scores. URL matches
when there aren't even URL's in my message?
..
What should I do? Just block their domain? I don't want to deal
17 matches
Mail list logo
